Talk:San people
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Greenman in topic Should the name be changed to "Bushmen"?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the San people article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Africa may be able to help! |
San people was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Africa may be able to help! |
Should the name be changed to "Bushmen"?
editIn the first chapter of Small Places, Large Issues, Eriksen notes, albeit parenthetically:
(By the way, the Bushmen are sometimes spoken of as the San, since the term Bushmen is by some considered vaguely racist. However, since ‘San’ is a pejorative term used by the neighbouring Khoikhoi, the term Bushmen is again in common use; see Barnard 2007.)
What is the current rationale for keeping the article's current name? Regards, Lunaroxas (talk) 23:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Take a look at the archives. This has been discussed numerous times in the past. Greenman (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)