Talk:Skin Diamond

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

African diaspora Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Untitled

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Apparently she didn't pose for Louis Vuitton nor did she pose for American Apparel. For example, in the case of the Louis Vuitton rumor, she actually posed for i-D Magazine and was holding a $30,000 Louis Vuitton handbag. Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCm6Z7FfS2k&t=130 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.37.83.12 (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Old complaint

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I wonder why my most recent expansion of this article was suddenly removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.133.234 (talk) 23:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Apparently the self nominated Wiki police has been at it again, More concerned with removing info and frustrating people that volunteer info, that is sufficiently sourced than with making an effort to add info to Wiki.

It has been said that Wikipedia gets less and less people willing to contribute articles and I can see why. For the live of me I do not understand why sourced indo has to be removed, but frankly, I dont care anymore. This was my last contribution to Wikipedia!!!

Here let me add a source:

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2009-01-03/tech/29988468_1_jimmy-wales-wikipedia-insiders — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.133.234 (talk) 23:12, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

ROFL: Lexi Belle Loves Girls is a reliable source

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What part of WP:IRS does it satisfy? Please read WP:BURDEN while you're at it. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

How is the interview not a reliable source? You have yet to actually explain that. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 03:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Full name

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Raylin Christensen [1].[2]Clip and text version

Is Scottish Daily Record considered unreliable for this? We are talking about for a persons name, nothing contentious about them. WikiVirusC^(talk) 17:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Both the Daily Record and the Sunday Mail are considered tabloid journalism and not reliable sources. Also see WP:BLPNAME. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic