Talk:The Zoological Record

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Coverage

edit

On 3 December 2009 Clifflandis replaced the history of the coverage of phyla in The Zoological Record with the 2007 phyla listing, which is quite different. The historical listing gave a sense of the growth of science, while the 2007 listing is merely a snapshot, and is replicative of the material in the article Phylum. Between the two, I would favor putting Coverage as a subset of the History section. --Bejnar (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Bejnar. The Bridson article lists some of the development dates of the ZR's sections, but they are presented in a rather confusing format (and only up to 1968). I can go back and put in the historical phyla titles, but I'll need to brainstorm a better way of presenting the information so that it is easily understood and so that it doesn't take up too much space. I just got some more articles on the history of the ZR through interlibrary loan, so I should be able to update the content in the next few days. -- Clifflandis (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Zoological Record. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
INTERN 3
Note 1
Project 22