This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.RaveWikipedia:WikiProject RaveTemplate:WikiProject RaveRave
"Cristian Hriscu, Mihaela Deac and Eduard Cîrcotă, who also produced the song" -> It is unclear who produced it.
Done Wrote it better now
"and reached the top 10 in Finland and Greece, and"
Done
The lead seems short
Done I tried to expand a bit, but this is all I can do
Background
"strophes" -> verses
Done
" later included on his eighth studio album of the same name" -> It works on the lead as the title is there, but here is not.
Done
Critical reception
"Tornerò" received generally positive reviews from music critics upon its release." -> This kind of sentences work on the lead because you are summarizing the article for the readers. On the article itself, instead, they are not required as readers can assess the sources provided.
Done Removed the sentence
favorites -> Any reason to use American English?
Done No, I've changed it to BE
"while Libertatea wrote" -> Libertatea didn't "write" it, a writer did
Done
"[in the Eurovision Song Contest 2006]" -> this can be simplified
Done
criticized -> Same as above
Done
"critici[s]ed Trăistariu's accent in the song" -> It says diction. Diction can be affected by multiple things
Done I changed it to "diction" then
"Nick Francis of The Sun" -> is the Sun a reliable source?
It's listed as a potentially unreliable sources if it presents controversial information. As it's not the case here, I guess we can leave it in place since it's only a review of a song.
"San Francisco, United States" -> San Francisco, California, there are dozens of SF in that country
Done
Suomen virallinen lista chart -> Suomen virallinen lista chart, as foreign text
Done
"the song sold over one million units worldwide according to Trăistariu" -> Trăistariu is not a reliable source for this
Done Removed
"Greek singer Anna Vissi (pictured in 2007) recorded a cover version of "Tornerò", among other artists." -> If you put "Among other artists" first, you can read why the wording is incorrect
Done I just removed "among other artists" completely.
National selection
"On 26 February 2006, the Selecția Națională was held in order to select the Romanian entrant for the Eurovision Song Contest 2006"
Done
"which remains their highest score until"
Done I guess(?)
Track listing
"Scandinavian/Romanian CD single[36][6]"
Done
Release history
Scandinavia - 30 August 2006 -> The CD single includes the release date?
Done No, and it's probably unreliable. Changed to "N/A 2006".
Category
Disco songs appears but not the other 3 genres
Done Rave doesn't have a category, but others I've added
2006 singles missing
Done
References
Some links, like BBC or ProQuest, are overlinked
I tend to think that we should link every published individually per reference, even if mentioned beforehand in another reference. If a user is to access ref #5, and publisher X isn't linked because it was in ref #3, well, then it's not the best option I guess. But you decide.
Source 24, Fricker: You should use {{cite book}} and its parameters instead
Done
Source 35: CD 5051011654350 does not indicate an inclusion of a music video in the tracks. According to this article 0094637051726 is. However "0094637051726" does not offer results on the net.
[1] Here you can see pictures of the CD tha was issued, with the artwork showing the inclusion of the music video.
"number 38 on the native Romanian Top 100, and at number four" -> MOS:NUMNOTES
I'm confused here. I always thought that you are supposed to write out numbers from one to ten, and then write numbers from 11 to ... as numbers. Should I change everything to numbers or should I write EVERYTHING out?
"were done by artists including Greek recording artist Anna Vissi" -> WP:SONGCOVER
I read the article, but I tend to think that those singers are really notable, especially Lora, and I think removing the facts that they've covered it it somehow wrong. But you decide.
I have answered to all of your comments. Greetings; Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2019 (UTC)