This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tree article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-3 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Tree has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tree Cookies
editI added a sentence about tree cookies to the trunk section of the parts section of the article and it was removed due to allegedly "off topic". In the context of forestry, foresters, logging, nature centers, and forest education I have heard the term tree cookie be used to refer to a slice of a tree. Especially when used to teach people about how to age a tree by "reading" the annual growth rings. I think it is extremely relevant and should be included. But I don't want to start an edit war so I would love to get the perspective of other editors. Middle Mac CJM (talk) 06:05, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- The fact is, however, that a "cookie" is just a piece of timber, an accidental by-product; the cited statement was just a definition (WP:NOTDICT), and it was followed by a brief uncited claim, not good. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- That makes sense. Thank you! Middle Mac CJM (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)