This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the subdivision of the history section called Boxer Rebellion, I request for where it says "The forces of the Eight-Nation Alliance, upon their capture of Peking, went on violent rampages against Manchu civilians, looting, raping, and murdering numerous civilians they came across" to "The forces of the Eight-Nation Alliance, upon their capture of Beijing, went on violent rampages against Manchu civilians, looting, raping, and murdering numerous civilians they came across" because most people know the city by the name of Beijing and Peking is just a Western word. 95.147.145.134 (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change:
"As Tamil women got raped by Japanese, the Japanese soldiers contracted venereal disease like soft sore, syphilis and gonorrhoea and Thai women also spread those diseases to coolies on the railroad."
To:
"As Japanese soldiers raped Tamil women, they spread sexually transmittal diseases (STDs) such as chancroid, syphilis, and gonorrhea. These epidemics in turn spread among Thai women and male railroad laborers."
Justification:
Reworded to assign the actions of rape and of spreading disease to the men actually perpetrating mass rape, rather than using passive language or assigning the actions to the unwilling victims. Changed disease terminology to consistently reflect the medical names rather than common names. Changed the outdated and offensive term "coolies" to more descriptive language. Yimmeny (talk) 23:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
That whole section needs work: poor grammar and sourcing of non-academic works written more than half a century ago.
Some of your changes such as saying there is a link between the outbreak between Japanese soldiers and coolies isn't supported by the source. Gonorrhoea is just the British spelling of the term and isn't anymore of a 'medical name' than gonorrhea. Coolie is the proper term to describe the labourers and isn't going to be removed due to it being potentially offensive per WP:NOTCENSORED.
"This lead to Japanese soldiers contracting venereal disease such as chancroid, syphilis and gonorrhoea. These diseases were also spread to coolies through Thai women living in near the railroad."
To:
"This lead to Japanese soldiers contracting and spreading venereal disease such as chancroid, syphilis and gonorrhoea. These diseases were also spread among coolies and Thai women living near the railroad."
Agreed, the original needs more work than this.
Again, there is a subtle tendency here to assign the action of spreading disease to the women and the suffered outcome of contracting the disease to the men. At best the spread of STDs is equally shared among all in the chain of exposure. In an article about sexual violence, especially, it's important to be careful about this language. Arguably, those who are raping multiple people in groups are doing the action of spreading disease, not the unwilling victims.
In my opinion, I don't think coolie is a well known term any longer, and it seems to me to be more useful and formal to use the clarity of "low-wage rail workers" than pejorative slang.
Change in spelling of gonorrhea was unintentional. Thank you. I only intended to change "soft sore".
It was not my goal to create a link between the first and second parts of the paragraph. I assumed the intent of the original author and sought to preserve it, perhaps poorly.
Coolie is a historical term and is appropriate in this usage, calling them rail workers ignores important context.
The source doesn't seem to explicitly state the spread between coolies and Thai women so I've removed it, it doesn't state that the Thai women were raped, they may have had consensual relations, may have been prostitutes, or maybe they were raped: but the source doesn't specify. Traumnovelle (talk) 05:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done Tollens (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done for now: Seems that the discussion was cut off. If either party wants to reactivate this request they're welcome to do so. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)