Talk:Waukesha Christmas parade attack
Latest comment: 2 months ago by ScottishFinnishRadish in topic As of ...
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Waukesha Christmas parade attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Waukesha Christmas parade attack. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Waukesha Christmas parade attack at the Reference desk. |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
 | This article and talk page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Can i add in parentheses that the crime being racially motivated is debatable and disputed?
editthat wouldn't mean he did it with the intention of racism, just that it's possible/some people think it was racially motivated and it's also a possibility. 2804:6A00:F014:8700:E9CD:1795:346B:1EC3 (talk) 13:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- NO, we that is what we already say, that the claim has been made but it is disputed. I am unsure what your idiot would change. Slatersteven (talk) 13:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Lmao, what a terrible writting, also "idiot"? Lmao, nice ad hominem, wikipedia editors are really proto-redditors 2804:6A00:F014:8700:E9CD:1795:346B:1EC3 (talk) 16:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Typo I meant to write edit. However the point stands, what will this suggested edit say we do not already say? Slatersteven (talk) 16:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Typo I meant to write edit." Yeah, you sure do buddy, you sure do, lol.
- "what will this suggested edit say we do not already say?"
- and why would that be a bad thing exactly? what's so bad about putting that the motivation bahind it being racism is disputed be such a bad thing? 2804:6A00:F014:8700:E9CD:1795:346B:1EC3 (talk) 16:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- We do not need to add words just for the sake of adding them. Slatersteven (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- "what will this suggested edit say we do not already say?"
- why not? isn't the point of the article to have as many info as possible as long as it is good and reliable? how does putting that the attack is disputed as being racially motivated be against Wikipedia's policy? at this point you are just grasping at straws, honestly i would not be suprised since the old version of this article called this tragey a "car crash" instead of an "attack", yeah totally not ideologically biased. 2804:6A00:F014:8700:E9CD:1795:346B:1EC3 (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- We do not need to add words just for the sake of adding them. Slatersteven (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Typo I meant to write edit. However the point stands, what will this suggested edit say we do not already say? Slatersteven (talk) 16:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Lmao, what a terrible writting, also "idiot"? Lmao, nice ad hominem, wikipedia editors are really proto-redditors 2804:6A00:F014:8700:E9CD:1795:346B:1EC3 (talk) 16:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Time for others to chip in, I have no wish to badger the process. Slatersteven (talk) 16:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- The current text makes clear that a racial motive is uncertain. WWGB (talk) 02:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
As of ...
editI think the correct wording is probably he currently remains at that facility as of March 2024
. If the incarceration at the location began in March, then he is currently as, as of the date that incarceration began. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)