Talk:Webby Awards
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Webby Awards article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
5 days left— is Wikipedia in?
editWe didn't win Best Practices, and it would be nice to win the People's Voice in Best Community. Waste of money, or worth our while? -- user:zanimum
Are web awards just click-through scams?
editI was always under the impression that website awards were mainly just ways of getting people to put a link to the award site on their pages, driving traffic to the award site. "Your website won an award! Put this image (and link to our site) on your site!" was all it took. Then the award site would make money from ads or partnerships with sites they linked to. Maybe the Webbys are above that, but I'm skeptical. A lot of awards sites are/were scams. — mjb 11:05, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Colloquially
editIf people, such as myself, have to look up the word, "colloquially" (4th word in the article), in the dictionary... should it be on Wikipedia? Food for thought.