Section 28(2A)

edit

I noticed that edits were made to Winnie Ewing's article to add her to the 'LGBT rights opposition' category and added text stating "joined her son Fergus Ewing in opposing repeal [of section 2A]". I was suprised to hear this and I checked the details of the vote [1] and found that both Ewings (not including Margaret) abstained rather than opposed. I see that the wording simply means "did not vote for repeal" but I this gives the notion that the Ewings voted against as opposed to not voting at all. I have changed the article to note this and have removed the 'LGBT rights opposition' category as many MSPs effectively abstained by not being present for the vote (such as Donald Dewar) and it is unfair to lump them in with the Tories or Souter.


Points taken. I udnertand that nthey delibertaley choose not to support repeal - a message in itself at a time when Parliament was polarised on the issue. Thanks.--Sjharte 17:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Winneewing.jpg

edit
 

Image:Winneewing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:WinnieEwing.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:WinnieEwing.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Winnie Ewing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


new source and edit errors

edit

In editing in references from a new source article https://www.thenational.scot/news/18422743.winnie-ewing-woman-helped-put-snp-scotland-map/ I have made some adjustments and then made the fatal mistake of leaving the page without saving. Attempted to retrieve the position, and apologise for any editorial errors remaining. Tried to fix a deadlink to BBC re-broadcast of BBC Alba 'Madame Ecosse' film but could not find original for that. Please be kind if you are hacing to update the page as a result of my interventions, apologies for any issues. Kaybeesquared (talk) 21:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
COMMUNITY 2
INTERN 2
Note 3
Project 25