Talk:World Chess Championship 2024
A news item involving World Chess Championship 2024 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 12 December 2024. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:53, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
First match without a European player
editDoesn't this depend on how you count Anand-Gelfand 2012? Gelfand was born in Europe (in Minsk to be precise), but at the time of that match, he was playing for Israel. Double sharp (talk) 04:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Removed the statement. Double sharp (talk) 04:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Match regulations announced
editHere. Double sharp (talk) 05:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've updated the article. Double sharp (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
FIDE has announced that Google will be the title sponsor of the World Chess Championship 2024.[1][2] 9ninety (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Teoh, Melvyn (2024-09-12). "Tech giant Google to sponsor Fide World Chess Championship in Singapore". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 2024-09-13.
- ^ "Google announced as Title Sponsor of World Chess Championship Singapore 2024". www.fide.com. Retrieved 2024-09-13.
French Defense described as “combative”
editThe French Defense is described as “combative” in the recap of Game 1. Though the game ended up being combative, I don’t think many chess players would generally describe the French Defense as combative. 2603:8080:13F0:A790:A5A3:9E3C:1B7:D2E (talk) 14:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- The word "combative" was precisely used to describe the French by ChessBase. It is very sharp in modern praxis. Double sharp (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I would not say it was used “precisely” to refer to the French Defense, but rather the McCutcheon Variation therein. If we wanted to be precise we could include a reference to the McCutcheon when we say combative, but in the mean time I’m glad to see my edit was not reverted as I still think it looks weird to describe the French as combative. At least on first read it stuck out to me as odd. 184.187.142.151 (talk) 03:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The same word is used in the chess.com article to describe the French defense. [1] Banedon (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I would not say it was used “precisely” to refer to the French Defense, but rather the McCutcheon Variation therein. If we wanted to be precise we could include a reference to the McCutcheon when we say combative, but in the mean time I’m glad to see my edit was not reverted as I still think it looks weird to describe the French as combative. At least on first read it stuck out to me as odd. 184.187.142.151 (talk) 03:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Gukesh's name
editWhy are we referring to him by his given name rather than his surname? Dommaraju is not difficult to pronounce or spell at all. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Because Gukesh's name is a Telugu name, and in this kind of name, the surname is not commonly given. Banedon (talk) 08:13, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Notation: No spaces in running text?
editWhy wouldn't we use spaces between the dot of the move's number and the field annotation in the running text ("10.g4!?")? --KnightMove (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- No space after the dot is a WP:CHESS convention for non-bolded moves. (The only consistent exception is in the ledes of openings articles, for moves that define the opening.) The convention seems to be undocumented (it probably s/b, at WP:CHESSNOTATION). As far as why, I dunno, I think it was a space-saving technique. The consensus on it predates my time on WP. Cheers, --IHTS (talk) 02:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC) p.s. I hear ya tho. (Was confused when first on WP, seeing e.g. "5.0-0", which seemed like "5.0" followed by misc characters. ) --IHTS (talk) 04:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Game 12 diagrams
editGive that Ding finished the game in style, I think it would be appropriate to use one of the diagrams to illustrate the final move 39.Rxg7+! MaxBrowne2 (talk) 07:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer the current two diagrams because by the time Ding played Rxg7, the game was over, and almost anything wins. The more interesting positions are earlier. Banedon (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
No pgn playback . Is there an explanation?
editI wonder why there is none. 2001:569:BF10:2A00:9192:4902:D942:933E (talk) 15:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)