Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Economy, trade, and companies
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
How should Wikipedia's voice describe the current for-profit/non-profit status of Grand Canyon University?
|
Should the Squad be described in the article as "far left?" TFD (talk) 22:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in the Birmingham Metropolitan Area, West Midlands
Which, if any, subsections of List of tallest buildings and structures in the Birmingham Metropolitan Area, West Midlands#Approved, proposed and emergent should be deleted? Should buildings in these sections with and without Wikipedia articles be treated differently? In favor of deletion is an interpretation of WP:CRYSTAL which says uncertain future events like building construction are out of scope for Wikipedia, especially for emergent proposals, which have not yet sought planning approval and it's unclear have a 50% probability of actually happening due to government rejection or financial difficulties. Against deletion is the argument that it's useful for research purposes to document the proposals and even though the proposals might not get built, they are referenced to reliable sources; approved designs are specific and more likely to get built. After this RFC is complete, the article may be split due to size, depending on what is kept. -- Beland (talk) 01:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |