I figured since I've been here for years now I should update my user page. The userboxes describe about 55 percent of who I am, but it is a good starting point.
My most inspiring, and tiring, work at Wikipedia continues to be in the JFK assassination articles. I'd still like to thank Oliver Stone for getting me interested in the subject. His movie JFK, is one of my all time favorites. It presents a compelling narrative of what he deems his 'counter-fiction'. However, I wish that there wasn't so much fiction in his counter-fiction and that he was more respectful to the evidence. Unfortunately, most of what I found to be his most damning evidence, is easily dismissed as false or misleading. It is not just a case of taking poetic license either. Once one takes a very cursory review of the actual evidence, the inaccuracies are made very apparent. That being said, I still thank him for sparking my interest in this exciting and always developing topic.
Here at Wiki, trying to follow the guidelines, as well as fend off vandals always keep me busy. I also enjoy working on the professional wrestling, hip hop, and political articles (been accused of being both a supporter and hater of the American right- which means I must be doing something right) here at Wiki.
Please direct comments or questions to me here. Unless I'm asked to do otherwise, I'll respond on my talk page.
I award Ramsquire a barnstar for adhering to a NPOV policy, for staying on topic and being civil in discussion, and for being a kind, valuable contributor to wikipedia. --Ubiq 08:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The Barnstar of High Culture
For your tireless efforts navigating through explosive religious, cultural and historical subjects, making sensible compromises and staying cool while doing that. ←Humus sapiensну? 04:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Looking over your "contributions" and your discussions not only on this article but on several others, I can see that you're a committed conservative idealogue, doing whatever you can to protect and enhance the reputations of famous conservative idealogues, while trying to make it look like you're "only following wiki policy" ("...only following orders" can't be far off for folks like you). I personally find that reprehensible, and won't spend any more energy fighting you over the trivialities of your hero Bill.--Info999 02:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
OTOH- There's this edit summary by Arzel. -- Ramsquire, don't POV push.
This web site isn't for the thin-skinned types and "editors" must learn that it is improper to delete properly cited information because of personal beliefs...In answer to the person above (Ramsquire), there is no "personal attack" on you or anyone else, only a critical review of the editing skills being exhibited. Remember the story of "the princess and the pea?" That princess should not try to be an editor. Her feelings might get "hurt." RPJ 23:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
