User:Zmbro/sandbox

Cod1

In the decades following its release, retrospective assessments of Call of Duty acknowledge the game's legacy of creating one of the biggest and iconic gaming franchises ever and laying the groundwork for every subsequent game in the series, as well as its impact on the first-person shooter (FPS) genre as a whole. Keith Arem, the game's performance director, said of its legacy: "It has really changed the industry from the inside. It pays off in what you're seeing in the production ways that we do things in the video game industry, the way that our scripts are defined, the way that our pipelines are defined, the way actors work. ... Call of Duty was one of the most important titles to showcase why we do what we do." Nevertheless, reception to the game itself has been less favorable over time, with many critics agreeing that the game aged poorly; it has generally placed low in lists ranking the series' games. More positively, the staff of IGN ranked the game number six in their 2024 list of the ten best Call of Duty games, writing: "While it's obviously a little out of date 20 years on, the campaign is still fun to play and it's impossible to understate the foundation it built for the future of not just the Call of Duty series but first-person shooters as a whole."

Cod2

Retrospective assessments of Call of Duty 2 have been mostly positive. Critics have praised the game for its campaign, impressive set pieces, gameplay, multiplayer, and innovations over its predecessor that would be mainstays in subsequent games in the series, including health regeneration, smoke grenades, and a grenade damage indicator. It has been called one of the Xbox 360's best games, one that showcased the console's technical achievements. Sam Loveridge of GamesRadar+ argued that Call of Duty 2 was "the foundation for the series' rapid rise to dominance". Others have criticized the game as dated and the limitations of the multiplayer on the Xbox 360, allowing only eight players in matches. In lists ranking the series' games, Call of Duty 2 has placed in the top five, with the staff of NME ranking it number two behind Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (2007), while others have placed it between ten and fifteen.

Cod3

Retrospective assessments of Call of Duty 3 have been mostly negative; it has placed low in lists ranking the series' games. Critics have criticized the game for lacking in innovation following its predecessors, although some noted the game featured elements that would be incorporated into later games in the series, such as vehicles, larger multiplayer maps, and quick-time melee events in the campaign. Due to its short development time, several agreed it was Treyarch's worst Call of Duty game but acted as a "first draft" to their superior later games.

Cod4

Retrospective assessments rank Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare as one of the best games in the franchise, if not the best. Critics have described the game as a classic, and one that changed gaming. The game has received critical acclaim for its campaign, characters, missions (particularly "All Ghillied Up"), and successfully breaking away from the series' World War II roots. ComicBook.com's Cade Onder argued Modern Warfare includes "some of the most jawdropping moments in gaming": "It's a game that just builds constant momentum and leaves you on the edge of your seat start to finish, making it an all-time classic." Dan Wenerowicz of Complex said the game represented the start of the "Golden Age" of Call of Duty.

Modern Warfare's multiplayer is considered revolutionary, introducing numerous conventions that become hallmarks of subsequent Call of Duty games and other first-person shooters, including XP leveling, the "Prestige" system (allowing players to restart from zero), the create-a-class system, perks, killstreaks, and camo grinds. Digital Trends summarized: "Modern Warfare's competitive multiplayer put a renewed emphasis on personal performance rather than winning individual matches, with players now carefully eyeing their kill-to-death ratio as they modified their weapons with custom sights and grips. Call of Duty would no longer play second fiddle to any other series, and its reign would last for the next decade." Other reviewers argued that subsequent games in the series, such as Modern Warfare 2 (2009), Black Ops (2010), and Black Ops II (2012), improved upon the conventions set by Modern Warfare.

World at War

1. 7: "The campaign was filled with a ton of close-quarters combat moments, many of which were in tight, packed trenches, and for the first time let you play with up to three other friends."; "What World at War may forever be remembered for, however, was its introduction of what we now know as the Zombies mode, or Nach der Untoten as it was called. Its multiplayer was also a hit as it brought in much of what made Modern Warfare great and adapted it for the era the game was set in."

1. 7: "World at War is the best World War II game in the series, period. Other games focused on the heroics, brotherhood, and grand scale of World War II. Treyarch went a different route and used a style that was haunting and dark to great success. The main menu theme was uniquely eerie and the campaign didn’t shy away from the horrors on all fronts. After all, this was the game that introduced us to the iconic Zombies mode. World at War was simply ahead of its time and it was able to build off of what Modern Warfare introduced the year before. So many ideas introduced with this title remain to this day. Multiplayer feels dated at this point, but the maps, Zombies, and the gritty campaign still hold up."

1. 6: "Call of Duty: World at War was Treyarch’s first game in the series since the underwhelming Call of Duty 3, and it managed to deliver the grimmest and goriest game the series had ever — or has ever — seen. Focused on Americans in the Pacific as well as the Russians closing in on Berlin, World at War doesn’t shy away from the horrors of war. Limbs and heads are severed, and mountains of bodies pile up, though it does lay the pathos on a little bit thick in the American section. Treyarch took the killstreaks and general structure of the Modern Warfare games and used it for World at War, and it worked surprisingly well. Better yet is the inclusion of Zombies for the first time, which eventually evolved to be one of the main pillars of Call of Duty, 13 years later."

1. 13: "World at War does do a surprisingly good job at being scary, with some sections merely being downright unpleasant and others channeling some genuinely spooky energy into their warfare."; "However, gruelling difficulty spikes and a German army outfitted with an unlimited supply of grenades make actually playing the campaign frustrating. Elsewhere, the multiplayer has the same compelling Modern Warfare feel, but things are slightly off. This also marks the introduction of the attack dog care killstreak, one of Call of Duty‘s most infuriating additions."

1. 4: "As already noted, Treyarch’s first attempt at making a Call of Duty game was not great, but the developer’s sophomore effort still stands out as one of the better entries in the series. Yes, it’s the fourth game in the series set during World War II, but much of the action takes place in the Pacific rather than Europe. But what really stands out is just how graphically violent the whole thing is. While many Call of Duty campaigns play out like PG-13 action movies, World at War pulls no punches by showing the horrors of war with dismemberments and realistic burns."; "Multiplayer played it safe in this entry, largely just copying the RPG mechanics of the previous year’s landmark entry, Modern Warfare, but setting everything during World War II. That might seem a little lazy in hindsight, but it was exactly what the series needed at the time, and it’s held up well. More importantly, this is the game that debuted Nazi Zombies: a mode that has become a fan favorite."

1. 4: "Remember being bummed that Call of Duty was returning to the World War II setting after experiencing CoD 4 for the first time? Remember going back on your word the instant you booted World at War up and jumped into either the campaign or multiplayer? Us too. The gory and brutal campaign contrasted with the exhilarating multiplayer, and Zombies mode is brilliantly balanced and will be forever missed."; "World at War is such a unique entry in the series, despite it being yet *another* World War II shooter at the time. The maps were spectacular, the same goes for the gunplay, and the campaign was so over-the-top challenging and violent that you legit winced during some cutscenes or missions. Lastly, to cap it all off, you had the Zombies mode, which birthed an entire storyline and fanbase due to how downright fun and replayable it was. There's no question that World at War is one of the best installments."

1. 8: "Coming immediately after COD4, this felt like a step back. People were really excited about modern-day settings, and this was not that. Despite that though, it builds upon COD4’s foundations in some pretty brilliant ways, and when the multiplayer was fully functional, it was a real blast."

1. 6: "Call of Duty: World at War was and still may be the darkest Call of Duty game ever made. It was the first game in the series to really use gore, allowing you to blow someone’s legs off and witness the carnage. This was absolutely necessary for the story being told as Treyarch wanted to highlight the atrocities of World War II in a new way. Simply seeing the death toll wasn’t enough, you had to feel it and that required making the player feel a bit dirty. ... This is a game where you hide in a pit of dead bodies as German soldiers shoot any stragglers, witness a man get a cigarette put out in his face, and much, much more. It’s a very violent game, but it’s impactful and smart. It also gave us Gary Oldman’s brilliant and memorable performance as Reznov, a cunning and hardened Russian soldier fighting with every ounce of strength to take back his home. ... The multiplayer was still a bit primitive compared to what it is now, but the gunplay was satisfying thanks to the gore and there were even some iconic maps that have returned in other games throughout the years. ... Perhaps its most notable contribution was the inclusion of Nazi Zombies, a secret mode that would change Call of Duty forever. Players could team up with friends and try to survive endless waves of the undead, something that would only grow to be more elaborate with subsequent DLCs and games."

MW2

1. 7: "one of the finest Call of Duty campaigns to date"; "On the multiplayer side, Infinity Ward mixed things up with a restructured loadout system, while the perk system was overhauled as well, much to the enjoyment of players."

1. 2: "Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and its sequel Modern Warfare 2 are not only some of the best Call of Duty games ever, but also some of the best and most important games of all time. While Modern Warfare set the gold standard for what these first-person shooters could be, Modern Warfare [2] pushed it to an even higher peak."; "We could talk about No Russian and the shocking, revenge-filled campaign ending all day, but multiplayer is where this game truly shines. From its customizable Killstreaks and progression challenges, to the focus on bigger maps with a ton of players, to the introduction of the cooperative Spec Ops maps, there was SO much to love about its multiplayer mode. And the best part? It just improved on everything else we loved from Modern Warfare, which we can’t wait to tell you about next..."

1. 1: "Modern Warfare 2 took what made the first game so wildly successful and enhanced all those features. In essence, this is the quintessential Call of Duty that all fans can agree was incredible. Weapons were fun to use, the perk system was engaging, and the create-a-class sandbox allowed for some wild combinations. While maybe one of the more unbalanced games in COD history, which made it frustrating to play at times, Modern Warfare 2 also had the fun factor that only MW2 was able to produce. Whether it was Ninja builds, noob tubes, or killstreaks, the chaos never stopped. Almost all weapons were viable, and the killstreaks counted toward higher killstreaks. Then you add the Intervention and the quick-scoping community to the mix, and iconic memories were made."; "Aside from the Multiplayer, the campaign was phenomenal. No Russian was an absolute shock when it appeared, along with the betrayals of Ghost and TF141. Nearly everything in Modern Warfare 2 was high quality and prioritized fun over anything else. It was a perfect combo of gameplay in that era that will be hard to ever replicate again."

1. 2: "Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare almost single-handedly redefined the modern first-person shooter with its thrilling campaign and endlessly customizable multiplayer component, so the bar was sky-high for Modern Warfare 2 when it was released two years later. Somehow, Infinity Ward managed to outdo itself, delivering another campaign filled with twists, betrayals, and action-packed set pieces while also building on what made the first game’s multiplayer so successful. The kill-streak concept was expanded to allow for even more ways to eliminate your enemies, and the progression system remained one of the most satisfying in all of gaming. Even a decade later, there’s just something about Modern Warfare 2’s pacing and map design that makes it a classic — it’s one of those games you could put in your Xbox 360 for months and never get tired of it."

1. 4: "Building on Modern Warfare‘s reinvention, Modern Warfare 2 is a confident, stylish romp. It may lack the substance of its predecessor but it made up for that with flash. "; "The multiplayer is famous for the sheer variety of completely broken, rage-inducing, combos. Modern Warfare 2 is a game where you can be killed by sentry guns, riot shields, sawn-off twin shotguns or even a throwing knife that has bounced down from a rooftop to kill you instantly – likely just in time for it to be the game-ending killcam, embarrassing you for years as part of someone’s frag video forever more."

1. 4: "Those were some big shoes that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 needed to fill as a sequel, and the fact it's the closest the series gets to managing that task is a testament to its class. The single player ups the scale of the spectacle without sacrificing any of the pacing, while the multiplayer introduces the greatest tiny map of all time: the incomparable Rust. Okay, there are some minor missteps, such as the Tactical Nuke killstreak and No Russian mission in the campaign, which mean it doesn't take the top spot. But it's hard to care about these issues when some of the most iconic moments of the series, like storming the gulag to rescue an important prisoner, never stop coming."

1. 2: "As amazing as the first Modern Warfare was, Infinity Ward somehow managed to top themselves with the sequel just two years later. The campaign is basically a highlight reel of the best moments in Call of Duty history. From the thrilling Rio De Janeiro favela pursuit and storming the gulag to the infamous “No Russian” mission and the absolutely insane conclusion that sees Soap pull a knife out of his own chest to throw at and kill Shepherd, Modern Warfare 2 does not let up."; "To be fair, the multiplayer wasn’t a huge step forward from the first Modern Warfare. However, it didn’t need to be, and it did introduce some maps that have gone down as the very best in the series (like Terminal and Rust). And who could forget the tactical nuke killstreak? Is it game-breaking? Yes, but the first time you see it go off is one of the most memorable moments in any multiplayer game. Finally, Modern Warfare 2 debuted the Spec Ops co-op mode, and arguably, no other Call of Duty has done Spec Ops better since."

1. 1: "Closing things out is 2009's Modern Warfare 2, which remains one of the most broken Call of Duties ever to exist, but somehow made it not matter due to how absurdly fun it was to play. Despite the "Noob-Tube" spawn traps, the Quickscoping, Tactical Insertions, etc., the game still managed to be fun and played tirelessly by millions for years to come. And that's saying something. ... It's mind-bending but true. Challenging someone to a 1v1 on Rust because they insulted your Quickscoping skills, pulling out a clutch 1v6 Search and Destroy round, or earning your first Nuke are memories we will never forget, and MW2 hosts all of them. And we didn't even cover its stellar campaign and Special Ops mode, which helps drive our point home on how fantastic this game was."

• "the best multiplayer shooter of all time"

1. 5: "Remember grenade launchers that could kill a whole crowd in a split second? Modern Warfare 2 players remember. Everything that happened in the campaign has been wiped from my brain and replaced by the term “noobtube.”"

1. 2: "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 somehow managed to top its predecessor in just about every way. The story goes bigger, gets even more shocking thanks to No Russian, and features one of the most defining multiplayer experiences of its generation. In addition to possibly one of the most over-the-top and theatrical campaigns in an FPS game, Modern Warfare 2 evolved the multiplayer in massive ways. Killstreaks were more than just UAV, an airstrike, and a roaming helicopter. Now, you could choose from 15 different streaks which allowed you to control helicopters, AC-130s, and even call in a nuclear bomb which would automatically end the game. The map selection was so iconic, Sledgehammer Games used it as the launch rotation for 2023’s Modern Warfare 3. ... Modern Warfare 2 also featured a really fun co-op mode called Spec-Ops which let players take on short missions with a friend. It was nice to have something cooperative and it was a welcome change of pace from the other usual content in the game."

Black Ops 1

1. 4: "among the most popular games in the franchise"; enjoyed its celebrity cast in the campaign mode and cameos from real-life historical figures; "The multiplayer moved the franchise forward by giving players the freedom to better express themselves and customize their characters with unique cosmetics."; innovative zombies mode

1. 5: praised celebrity cast; ranked the campaign the series' best; "Black Ops’ multiplayer is just as iconic and some of the maps, including Firing Range and Nuketown, are still favorites in 2023 as they have been brought forward multiple times. The multiplayer suite also introduced CoD Points, which changed how things were unlocked and made progression feel fresh again."; "Nazi Zombies returned too, except this time as a full-fledged mode, and it even let you play as JFK, Fidel Castro, Richard Nixon, or Robert McNamara. There was also an unlockable mode that played like a retro arcade version. It was all wonderful."

1. 3: "World at War may have been the first massive hit for Treyarch, but Black Ops would set the stage for a series that has six different mainline titles. It introduced Nuketown, the storyline with Woods, and iconic Zombies maps like Kino der Toten and Five. Then there’s the multiplayer as a whole. For the first time, players could dolphin dive at will. Maps like Firing Range and Launch were just a couple of names within the long list of quality arenas. Wager matches and Gun Game brought some fun modes to the table outside of the usual offerings. Even the customization introduced face paints and emblem editing. When Black Ops was released, it was easily the best game in the series at that point in terms of content and gameplay. There is a reason so many players have a soft spot for it."

1. 3: "Treyarch was finally able to get out of Infinity Ward’s shadow and establish itself as a premier Call of Duty studio with 2010’s Black Ops. A thrilling mystery set during the Cold War and partially taking place in Vietnam, its ambitious story dealt with conspiracy theories and the role the United States could have played in the JFK assassination, along with the failed Bay of Pigs operation. It even called back to characters and scenes from World at War, blending elements from the World War II shooter into the newer game. Top-notch voice performances from actors like Sam Worthington and Gary Oldman helped sell the whole thing, and we still yell about “the numbers” regularly. Though it didn’t drastically reinvent the Call of Duty formula, Black Ops nonetheless delivered well-balanced combat across a variety of maps, ranging from the jungles of Vietnam to the famous Nuketown. The map was so beloved that it has been released in every Treyarch game to date, and they’d feel downright incomplete without it."

1. 5: "Black Ops is a worthy successor to the 2007 Modern Warfare and is one of the best settings for a Call of Duty game, letting players explore America’s secret wars through the eyes of a few celebrity cameos."; "The campaign is good fun although weirdly paced."; "The multiplayer is exceptional too, taking what made Modern Warfare work and lacquering it with Cold War-era cool. It’s not quite as much fun, but killing an enemy with a ballistic knife – a knife you shoot like a gun – or even rinsing enemies in Search and Destroy with a FAMAS, ensures this is a game many players will be fond of."

1. 2: "Call of Duty: Black Ops' Vietnam outing is undoubtedly Treyarch's best in the series, with a storyline that’s tonnes of silly fun and multiplayer modes that actually add some worthwhile new game types to try. The introduction of Gun Game - where every kill you get forces you to use a different weapon - is inspired, while going back in time to the ‘60s doesn't diminish the forceful kick of the weapons. A Cold War setting turns out to be perfect for COD, with a moral murkiness that has the capability to shock in places, while pitch perfect use of The Rolling Stones gives it a flavour that none of the other games have. Still can’t figure out what those numbers mean, though."

1. 5: "Black Ops was proof that Treyarch could create a compelling Call of Duty subseries on par with what Infinity Ward had done with Modern Warfare. Moving the action to the ‘60s could have meant just another derivative Vietnam War game, and while you spend a fair amount of time in Southeast Asia, Black Ops goes one step further by fully embracing the espionage and paranoia of its Cold War setting. That approach led to a number of classified missions set all over the world, which culminated in the best twist in any Call of Duty campaign."; "While Black Ops is absolutely a fantastic game, and often ranks even higher on lists like this, the multiplayer modes are a bit lacking. Again, what’s here is fantastic. The series had found its groove by 2010, though, and Treyarch found little reason to deviate. So while the competitive and Zombie modes are absolutely worth checking out (and continue to be favorites for many nostalgic fans), they just didn’t do much different than what had come before at this point."

1. 3: "Taking what they learned from World at War, Treyarch was primed and ready to release yet another unforgettable entry into the Call of Duty series, and they absolutely nailed it with the first Black Ops. ... The continuation of the Zombies mode was enough to get fans excited, but no one expected the campaign to be as wild and out of control as it was, which grabbed hold of you and never let go from the moment you start it. And this isn't even mentioning the stellar multiplayer. ... Custom emblems, the birth of Nuketown, dolphin diving, tomahawks, excellent maps and modes, you name it, and Black Ops had it. Treyarch was simply on fire at this point, and Black Ops made you pay attention to them if World at War didn't already grab your attention. You couldn't imagine them besting it at the time, but then..."

1. 2: "The Cold War-era setting made the original Black Ops standout among the COD games on the market at the time, and it backed that setting up with one of the best storylines we’d seen in a COD game, some legendary multiplayer maps, and games modes like the iconic Sticks and Stones. This is still a firm-favorite for many COD fans, and for good reason too. Nuketown, anyone?"

1. 4: "Call of Duty: Black Ops was the first time the series had gone anywhere outside the modern era and World War II, allowing for yet another exploration on a dark period in human history: the Vietnam War. The game layered itself in conspiracy theories, allowing players to fill the shoes of characters in the CIA as opposed to your typical grunt on the front lines. You were there to do the dirty work whether that be killing Fidel Castro or torture someone by feeding them broken glass. The story is mindbending, twisty, and quite risky for a series that had previously been seen as nothing more than United States propaganda. While Black Ops doesn’t completely demonize the United States government/military, it does raise questions and even implicates its protagonist as the possible killer of John F. Kennedy… it’s a wild game. ... The multiplayer also pushed things forward by allowing players to customize their character for the first time with things like face paint. You could also earn in-game currency which you could use to buy items and even bet on party game modes known as Wager Matches. Modes that are now staples of Call of Duty such as One in the Chamber and Gun Game found their beginnings here and allowed for a nice variety from the typical multiplayer offerings in Call of Duty. Zombies also evolved in a significant way with larger maps, elaborate Easter eggs, and much more interesting gameplay opportunities. "

MW3

1. 9: improved on what came before; "Its multiplayer added new elements such as weapon progression, proficiencies, and more, but what it did best was create one of the most compelling and addicting Call of Duty multiplayer experiences ever made up to that point."; "The campaign was fun enough and even though it isn’t one of our favorites, it had the amazing setpieces and “wow” moments that made this franchise so popular. It was also the conclusion of one of the most beloved Call of Duty trilogies ever and that in itself was another reason it was worth the admission price."

1. 8: "Back in 2011, Modern Warfare 3 was called a worse version of MW2. The game felt familiar in so many ways while also losing much of the identity that made the predecessor so successful. Compared to what would follow, Modern Warfare 3 was a stellar game that had an incredibly fun Multiplayer and a monumental campaign that closed the chapter for Captain Price against Makarov in World War 3. To this day, COD has not been able to recreate a trilogy that matches the original Modern Warfare games as far as campaigns and characters go. It's clear that Modern Warfare 3 was a great COD title. It simply lacked the fun factor, the style, and the iconic maps from the previous game."

1. 9: "By 2011, Call of Duty had already cemented its legacy with several stellar first-person shooters, but franchise fatigue had also begun. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 wrapped up the groundbreaking trilogy with another action-packed campaign and tight multiplayer mode, but without much of the original Infinity Ward team on the project, it felt like the developers were tracing a drawing rather than creating something on their own. This isn’t to say that Modern Warfare 3 isn’t worthy of the Call of Duty name. Its multiplayer was as addictive and fast-paced as ever, and there were plenty of set-piece moments, but without the passion behind it, the game never escaped the shadow of its older siblings."

1. 14: "Modern Warfare 3 fares fairly well when you consider all of the dramatic occurrences going on behind the scenes, but it mostly coasts on the Modern Warfare name. Modern Warfare 3 hits the same notes as MW2, even including a playable terror attack on civilians that can be skipped. This is the end of the original Modern Warfare trilogy, meaning a lot of players might have gone through this just to find out what happens with Captain Price and pals."; "There’s a wealth of content for players who want to stick it to the AI, with survival mode and spec ops letting players team up and batter enemies. The multiplayer is fairly average too, slightly worse than its predecessors, but interesting enough for the time. MW3 is an iterative entry rather than anything really interesting."

1. 12: "To be fair, it’s not a bad game, but those first two games were always going to be a tough act to follow. "; "The campaigns of its predecessors featured some of the most memorable moments in FPS history. Meanwhile, this final showdown with Makarov’s forces is known for being all over the place narratively and largely recycling set pieces from earlier games. Similarly, the tweaks to Killstreaks designed to make multiplayer more balanced than the last title never really worked out as planned, meaning few gamers still pine for the game’s online heyday. At least this was the debut of the Kill Confirmed mode though, which was a solid addition to the series’ multiplayer suite."

1. 10: "Concluding the Modern Warfare trilogy is a game that fans are torn on to this day and likely needs to introduction. Modern Warfare 3 is the worst of the series, we think we can all agree there, but it is better than the nine other entries we've listed so far, so that should give you a general idea of the quality of the game and how on-point Infinity Ward was at this time."; From its bombastic send-off of the Modern Warfare storyline to its always exciting multiplayer modes, Modern Warfare 3 offers a complete package that comes with some significant caveats that hold it back from being one of the greats."; Compared to Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2, MW3's multiplayer lacks that special *something* that makes those titles all-time classics, and it would launch somewhat busted, with no update months later to make matters worse. Overall, Modern Warfare 3 isn't the worst of the bunch, but it isn't the best either, so it sits firmly in the middle."

1. 3: "The finale to the original Modern Warfare trilogy also felt like the most refined one. The story came to a climactic end – while not quite hitting the highs of the first game in the series – and the multiplayer shooting was some of the sharpest we’d ever seen in a COD game. It flies under the radar because it wasn’t all that original, but MW3 was a fantastic iteration for the series."

1. 5: "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 opted to refine instead of completely evolve the Call of Duty formula at the time, but it did so rather perfectly. The campaign provided an emotional conclusion to the trilogy, the multiplayer used the foundation of its predecessor and made a number of welcomed additions such as scorestreaks, and it provided a ton of content post-launch to keep players invested. It may not have been as revolutionary as the last few games before it, but it was a rock solid experience that sent the Modern Warfare trilogy out with a bang."

BO2

1. 8: praised Raul Menendez as one of the series' best villains; "Black Ops 2’s multiplayer also had a few firsts like the Pick 10 system and Scorestreaks, adding a welcome level of depth and customization to the experience. Throw in its Zombies mode, which was the perfect, laugh-filled alternative to the campaign and multiplayer, and Black Ops 2 is still a standout Call of Duty game over a decade later."

1. 2: "Black Ops 2 is considered the best game from the Treyarch team by a wide margin. Multiplayer had the best balance of competitive play we’ve seen in the series. The Pick 10 system completely changed the game for how create-a-class works. Players had more choices than ever, but they also had to make sacrifices. Weapons felt great to use at any stage, the mastery camo grind gave us Diamond for the first time, and there was a perfect amount of attachments to experiment with. But more importantly, Black Ops 2 had the best list of maps ever conceived: Hijacked, Standoff, Raid, Slums, and many more. The worst maps in the game were better than some of the best maps in the Warzone era. They were perfect for League Play, which brought what many players consider to be among the best Ranked Play systems in the series. It’s the competitive side and the balance in BO2 that previous titles lacked. And we can’t forget maps like Mob of the Dead or Die Rise for the Zombies mode. Without a doubt, Black Ops 2 has earned its spot as one of the two best Call of Duty games."

1. 8: "The follow-up to the excellent Black Ops had expectations soaring, possibly out of any developer’s reach. Call of Duty: Black Ops II felt like a game that had been designed by two entirely different studios. Its multiplayer emphasized customization with its Pick 10 system and a mix of futuristic weaponry, but its campaign was a scattershot series of missions that struggled to find an identity. It isn’t for Treyarch’s lack of effort, though. Real-time strategy elements were even mixed into certain missions, and while they were only mildly successful, it showed the studio’s commitment to always trying new things."

1. 7: praise multiplayer; "This was the last phenomenal Call of Duty game before 2019’s Modern Warfare – after this, the mutliplayer started to unravel."

1. 5: "The original Black Ops’ trilogy was where Treyarch was allowed weird, and it’s all the better for it (and paved the way for the sixth game to go down a similar route). Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 is the first – and so far, only – time COD experiments with multiple endings to decent effect. Carrying out Strike Force missions and fulfilling certain objectives in the main levels drastically alters the direction of the story, adding depth and a reason to return once the credits roll, even if there’s less new stuff to see. A longer lasting – and much more important – introduction in multiplayer is the Pick 10 system, which gives greater control of your loadout and playstyle, moulding the greater levels of customisation the series now offers. While not every change would be picked up, this entry is both a great example of Call of Duty’s strengths and one that experiments enough to stand out on its own."

1. 1: "Black Ops II is the gold standard for Call of Duty games. If we were just judging the campaign (an explosive tale that switches between the 1980s and 2025) on set pieces alone, this would be one of the best in the series. What really sets it apart, though, is the freedom and replayability. The choices you make and how Strike Force missions go directly impact which of the multiple endings you’ll see. Plus, you can actually customize your loadout before each mission. For that alone, it’s head and shoulders above the single-player options in every other Call of Duty game."; "Zombies was greatly expanded with the 4v4 competitive Grief mode, and you can even play as a zombie for the first time ever, but it deserves extra praise for going off the rails in the best way possible with the insane “Mob of the Dead” story that sees time traveling mobsters fighting off the undead. Of course, the real star here is multiplayer, which introduced the customizable Pick 10 system. The new progression system to prestige guns could have come off as grindy, but it actually just gives you even more incentive to keep playing. This was the pinnacle of the series that a lot of players are still pining for."

1. 2: "Enter Black Ops 2, Treyarch's best Call of Duty to this date, as they took what worked in World at War and the first Black Ops and created their magnum opus to just flex on everyone around them. Black Ops 2 is a phenomenal game and easily one of the best Call of Duties ever released. ... The brilliant Ranked and Social modes that kept the ultra-competitive players away from the ultra-social ones was *chef's kiss* and the campaign and Zombies were remarkable in every way. Everything you knew and loved from the first Black Ops was back and better than ever, minus the awful currency system. ... Furthermore, the gameplay was fast and fun yet balanced, and the map design still holds up to this day as some of the best and smartly crafted. When we mentioned just a bit ago that Treyarch was on fire, we weren't kidding, and Black Ops 2 showcases precisely why they were on the top of their game."

1. 4: "Black Ops II was the first time the series went into the future, and it was a resounding success. The campaign felt entirely fresh in a near-future setting, and it carried over to everything else. The weapons, the perks, the equipment – while some of these still had the same uses as in previous game, the new coat of paint made Black Ops II look and feel like something entirely new."

1. 1: "Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 is top-tier Call of Duty. It inched the series toward the future just enough to keep things feeling fresh without being jarring, introduced the pick-10 system, had an incredible campaign with branching paths, a multiplayer that remains iconic and fun to this day, and a Zombies mode that featured some of the best maps and experiences the franchise has ever seen. There is a reason people flocked to this game repeatedly over the last decade, even years after its release, and still long for a remaster/remake. ... Whether or not Call of Duty ever sees these heights ever again is a mystery, but Black Ops 2 is easily one of the best shooters of its time and remains a banger a decade later."

Ghosts

1. 17: "Golden Age COD ended when Ghosts officially launched. For the first time in the series, quality was noticeably worse after Infinity Ward began to move in a philosophical direction that would impact future games as well. Maps were massive in many cases, and the three-lane design was tossed out the window. If those maps looked good, at least players could enjoy the scenery, but the color palette was meant to be gritty and everything looked kind of ugly because of it. While players were running around the giant washed-out maps, the fast time-to-kill would get them at long ranges. Gone were the days of adrenaline-fueled routes on predictable map designs that forced different styles of fights. Instead, we really got the epitome of run-and-gun gameplay here, which is when the series is at its worst."

1. 18: "The first Call of Duty game released on Xbox One and PlayStation 4, Call of Duty: Ghosts had very little to differentiate itself from the series’s past games. Part of it was in space, part of it was in urban areas, and part of it was in the foliage, but it lacked a strong villain or the mystery we’ve come to expect from Call of Duty. Multiplayer also made no attempt to innovate, but it was, at the very least, well-designed. Getting a sniper headshot still felt amazing, even if you had done it all before."

1. 18: "a fairly meh entry in the series that commits the cardinal sin of being nearly completely unmemorable, with a single-player campaign that ends with a miserable cliffhanger that will never be resolved."; "The multiplayer is fairly underwhelming but a load of stuff has been done on the technical side: this was the first game to have sliding, leaning and animations for when you’re clambering around the environment, creating a more dynamic feeling CoD. It also has a very fast time to kill (TTK) and bigger maps than before, hinting at a Call of Duty that was trying to reinvent itself."; "Sadly, Ghosts failed to hit the mark as the first indicator that the Call of Duty series was folding under its own weight, which led to serious changes in how the games were developed."

1. 10: "Ghosts is widely disliked by many Call of Duty fans, but I’d say in hindsight it made a lot of daring changes that have actually aged pretty well. The campaign is absolutely one of the best in the series, thanks to a more unique setting where battered U.S. forces face down a federation of South American countries. That very different type of conflict means levels set everywhere from the ocean depths to outer space. At one point, you even play as a dog."; "Admittedly, the multiplayer maps are not the best in the series, but the expansive Create a Soldier mode with its multitude of perks and classes means it’s almost impossible not to find the perfect loadout. And let’s not forget Extinction: a unique co-op alien-hunting mode that’s actually closer to Left 4 Dead than the Zombies modes of other Call of Duty games. We’ll probably never see a Ghosts 2, but there are certainly some great ideas here that could mined in future CoD installments."

1. 18: "underwhelming"; "Now it's not like Ghosts is a terrible game by any stretch, it just failed in many ways to capture what made Infinity Ward and their precious Modern Warfare titles special and unique in the first place. The campaign and multiplayer felt flat and uninspired. Furthermore, the new Extinction mode failed to compete with Treyarch's Zombies, making the complete package have lots of content with very little to say."

1. 19: "Call of Duty games are iterative, they’re not all unique and interesting. I know that, you know that. But this is just Modern Warfare 3 in a new coat of paint. Some of the series’ worst maps can be found in Ghosts, and the campaign? Rubbish, honestly. It was so uninspired that the game’s E3 showcase was mostly about how the team had rendered a dog."

1. 20: "Call of Duty: Ghosts had a lot of potential to be one of the most interesting games in the series as it's the first one to really break away from the typical military story. While you do play as soldiers, the story revolves around the battle for a near-post-apocalyptic America after it has been invaded and devastated by foreign forces. The story is like Red Dawn meets Call of Duty, but unfortunately… it’s not executed in the strongest of ways. Not only is the game visually very ugly due to a bleak, brown/grey color scheme, but the characters lack the stature of other Call of Duty heroes and the drama lacks urgency most of the time. ... On top of that, the multiplayer mode failed to capture an audience beyond its first year due to mediocre gameplay and even then, it felt like Ghosts lost a lot of its player base fairly early on. For Infinity Ward’s first endeavor post-Modern Warfare and the first Xbox One/PS4 era Call of Duty, Ghosts was a big let down."

Advanced Warfare

1. 15: "Like Infinite Warfare, this game was facing an uphill battle from the start. Ghosts left a sour taste behind in the previous year, then jetpacks were introduced. But players who could look past the initial hate found an experience that was pretty good. Gameplay was snappy, rewarding players who were able to use the new exo movement to its full capacity. Maps were more vertical, and modes like Uplink bolstered this new design with incredibly exciting competitive matches. Plus, the campaign that went along with this new Multiplayer was Call of Duty adrenaline at its finest. Some movement skills, weak Supply Drops, and a handful of underwhelming maps did drag the thrill of the experience down a bit, though. Despite the mixed rating it received, Advanced Warfare did play better than some of the other CODs we’ve mentioned thus far. That’s a W."

1. 15: "After assisting with the development of Modern Warfare 3, Sledgehammer Games was given the chance to lead its own project for 2014’s Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Taking the series further into the future than it had gone to date, its exo-suit gameplay and high-tech weapons promoted verticality and constant movement, making it difficult to master but incredibly rewarding. No longer were your enemies just coming from the left or the right, but possibly directly above your head. Advanced Warfare’s techno-political thriller campaign addressed the public’s growing fear of private military contractors and the role they’ll play in society going forward. It was completely absurd, but Sledgehammer has a knack for blockbusters and the closing moment is quite satisfying. Despite its critical success, Advanced Warfare didn’t light the sales charts on fire, so a direct follow-up is unlikely."

1. 10: "Another stellar campaign, Advanced Warfare feels like playing the best action movie you can think of."; "Elsewhere, quick-time events and a lack of freedom really marred the experience. The multiplayer has wall-running and a lot of mobility, but somehow still feels approachable, with clean maps that make the game feel like a tighter Titanfall rather than the mess of high-speed shootouts you might see in Infinite Warfare or later Black Ops entries."

1. 8: "I love Advanced Warfare for its unintentionally hilarious campaign moments. The game tries to deal with serious issues like chemical weapons and the dangers of private military contractors, but this is also the game where Kevin Spacey (basically just playing his Frank Underwood character from House of Cards) casually announces he’s going to take over the world on the floor of the United Nations. This is also the campaign that gave the internet the infamous “Press ‘F’ to pay respects” meme. It deserves to be recognized as one of the better Call of Duty games just for that."; "Multiplayer is more of a mixed bag. The Pick 13 system expands on one of the best ideas from the beloved Black Ops II, but this was also the first Call of Duty game to experiment with more futuristic weapons and hardware. The Exosuit is cool in the campaign and makes for a very unique Zombies mode, but when it comes to multiplayer matches, it’s something you’re either going to really love or something you’re going to think completely ruins what made Call of Duty great."

1. 7: "After assisting Infinity Ward with the development of Modern Warfare 3, Sledgehammer Games would become a permanent development team for the Call of Duty franchise, expanding the teams from two to three. As a result, each team would now have a three-year dev cycle to work on their next title, giving them much-needed time to cook up what's next for the series."; "dvanced Warfare would be Sledgehammer Games' first shot at making their own Call of Duty title. And, by all means, they crushed it, despite implementing Exo movement, which took Call of Duty's already fast-paced action and cranked it up to eleven."; "The campaign's story was well done and easy to follow, the gameplay was refreshing yet familiar, and the map design and weapons were exceptional, which is all you can really ask for in a Call of Duty title. The only downside were the loot boxes... those can go straight to you know where."

1. 10: "Advanced Warfare was brilliant, with a fatal flaw: rear paddles weren’t common on controllers back then. I’m going to be honest, the default control method for Advanced Warfare on controller feels custom-built to induce RSI. The big gameplay adjustment for this entry is a double-jump and an aerial boost, which allows you to perform some amazing gameplay maneuvers. Enemy behind you? Double jump, dash back, and land to find yourself now behind them. Beautiful, but every boost required clicking in the left stick. This might not have been an issue for everyone, but I have no history of RSI, and yet this? This? Brutal. Amazing gameplay hampered by the controllers of the era."

1. 8: "Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is yet another deeply underrated Call of Duty game. After fans had complained for years that we were getting the same game every year, Sledgehammer Games took the bold approach for its first original game of changing everything as we knew it. Movement became more advanced with jet packs, allowing you to slide around at high speeds and leap high above your foes and rain bullets down on them. Gunfights became more vertical and traversing the map became more exciting and strategic, there wasn’t really an opportunity to stand still and camp in this game due to how fast-paced everything was and players’ ability to move around in more creative ways. ... The Advanced Warfare story was also quite strong. It had a great performance from the now-disgraced actor Kevin Spacey as a CEO of a private military company, manipulating his way through politics to achieve all-out war. It also featured some really unique set pieces such as a moment where you have to use your exosuit to jump across traffic on a freeway, a battle on the Golden Gate bridge, and more. ... It was the most innovative Call of Duty game at the time and it may still be. Whether or not we ever see a return to this era remains to be seen, but it’s a game that took a risk in one of the biggest entertainment franchises out there and it largely paid off."

BO3

1. 5: "Somehow, a jetpack-era game snuck into the rankings with all the Golden Age titles. That’s because it’s one of the best Multiplayer iterations of Call of Duty ever. Almost every aspect of the game was perfect for competitive play in a fun environment. Jetpack movement was tuned to feel just right. Unlike Advanced Warfare, the maps were much better for jetpack gameplay and most of them were a blast to play on. Specialists were added for the first time, which brought UItimate-like skills to the arena. So many of the guns were balanced—even though the M8 was always there as a crutch. Out of all the games in the franchise, Black Ops 3 may be the closest to perfecting the moment-to-moment gameplay that makes COD compulsive. The accolades, killstreaks, sound design, movement— everything was here, and it remains the only jetpack game that much of the casual or competitive community can agree was genuinely great"

1. 17: "Treyarch decided to double down on the futuristic elements of the Black Ops games with Call of Duty: Black Ops III, and it was the first time it failed to excite. Mind-controlled drones and weapons were not enough to overcome the sense that we had played all this before, and the studio seemed to have so little faith in its writing that it gave players the chance to play campaign missions in any order. That is, of course, unless they played on Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3, which omitted the mode altogether."

1. 15: "forgettable" entry; "it often feels like there’s just too much going on and so little freedom."; "The tonal whiplash and the fact these elements aren’t handled that well puts a dampener on a campaign with solid ideas."; "The multiplayer adds in unique operators but is bland and disinteresting. If you haven’t played this already, you haven’t missed much."

1. 16: "Adding four-player co-op to the campaign is part of what’s given the game such longevity, but it also means the campaign is much weaker than others if you’re playing alone."; "As for multiplayer…well, this was the game that introduced specialists, something that fans either love or hate. Thruster packs also gave the multiplayer a much different feel from other games in the series, though some clear inspiration was taken from Titanfall in that area. This was really the beginning of the franchise looking to competitors for inspiration rather than forging new ideas on its own. Regardless of how you feel about these changes, at least the expanded Zombies mode is worth checking out."

1. 11: "Treyarch would be the first devs to take advantage of the new three-year dev cycle with Call of Duty: Black Ops 3, and they crushed it while simultaneously dropping the ball at the goal line. Black Ops 3 has fluid movement, well-designed maps, and fun new game modes to test in multiplayer, alongside an exhilarating campaign and Zombies mode."; "So, what's the problem here? Well, the weapon balance and introduction of Specialists made most encounters frustrating and unnecessarily complex for what they were trying to accomplish."; "While the moment-to-moment action could be undeniably fun, getting insta-killed in a split-second from across the map isn't necessarily going to win people over. For what it's worth, the wall-running and how the maps were intricately designed to incorporate it is a highlight of the game for sure. We just wish the gameplay wasn't so annoying."

1. 16: "I have to tell you, I don’t know what’s going on with this one. I looked up the campaign on YouTube and I have no memory of any of it. There’s a scene with a floating ethereal being and a dude gets tied up by a tree. Did I even play this game? If I did, I forgot it."

1. 12: "Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 is probably the inverse of Infinite Warfare where it had a really strong multiplayer, but a painfully bad campaign. The multiplayer felt like a breath of fresh air, taking the baton from Advanced Warfare and pushing the new movement forward with wall-running. On the back of Titanfall, it was exactly what the series needed at the time to feel new and exciting. On top of that, the Specialists felt well implemented in this game and allowed for new kinds of gameplay such as utilizing an explosive bow and arrow. ... As for the campaign, it was convoluted as hell and needlessly obtuse. It felt like the game was trying to be too smart after the Black Ops series had developed a reputation for having slightly more elevated storytelling than its Modern Warfare counterparts. However, Black Ops 3 tried too hard and failed miserably. This was also the first time players could play the campaign in co-op, but it didn’t seem to gel well with the narrative and the feature was never seen again. Despite the story, Black Ops 3 had a lot of right ideas and pushed the series in exciting new directions, even if it wouldn’t maintain course for much longer."

Infinite Warfare

1. 16: "Out of all the games on the list, Infinite Warfare is more a product of its release than anything else. There are plenty of criticisms to point out about the Multiplayer specifically, such as Rigs that were cheap versions of Specialists and jetpacks that lacked fluidity. However, the game was doomed from the start. When the trailer was released on YouTube, it became the most disliked gaming video of all time. Simply put, fans were sick of jetpack CODs in a futuristic setting. Even with a well-made campaign and a Zombies mode that was well-received, the Multiplayer couldn’t boost to the heights of Black Ops 3."; "Combat Rigs weren’t as fun as the Specialists from Black Ops 3, and movement didn’t feel as tight and responsive. Even if fans were ready for another futuristic jetpack title, Infinite Warfare was certainly the worst of the three, and there is a reason it has that kind of reputation."

1. 20: "It pains us to put Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare so low on our list because Infinity Ward had huge ambitions for its release (and so did we). The game’s campaign ditched the linear, mission-to-mission approach and instead let players pick and choose side objectives to complete. It even included some great spaceship combat segments. The bleak story was somehow understated despite featuring interplanetary travel. We loved that the characters felt like real people, and the freedom to select side objectives helped with development. The problem was that the shooting just felt wrong. A substantial amount of flinching made combat a pain in single-player. Multiplayer wasn’t much better, thanks to the poor map design. The game’s potential only made the disappointment and frustration even harder to swallow in-game."

1. 11: "One of the best Call of Duty campaigns ever made collides full-body with a terrible multiplayer offering."; campaign "at moments this is the best Call of Duty has ever been."; "The multiplayer, however, is terrible. Everyone moves too fast, but combat inversely feels too slow, with a long TTK and weapons that feel ineffectual. Even a futuristic Terminal reskin can’t save this from just feeling a little bit disappointing. ... Even now, the campaign is worth your time. We don’t get enough hard sci-fi shooters and Infinite Warfare shows how much of a shame that is."

1. 14: "Due largely to being set in the far future, Infinite Warfare received more hate than almost any other game in the series when it was announced. A lot of fans felt the series was straying too far from its roots. To be clear, this game does lean hard into its sci-fi trappings. In the main campaign, you’ll probably shoot more robots than human soldiers, using theoretical weapons like seeker drones are energy rifles, but the combat still feels like Call of Duty at its core. It also lets you decide which order you want to tackle some missions in a small, but welcome, departure from previous games."; "Multiplayer modes are a bit more of a mixed bag. Rigs and thrust jumps make PvP feel a lot like a slightly improved Black Ops III, so it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. But if nothing else, Infinite Warfare deserves credit for its expansive Zombies mode which actually packs enough content and story to warrant a full-fledged release."

1. 20: worst game in the series

1. 6: "Infinite Warfare did something drastically different. No, really: there are optional missions, a space ship you can navigate through space, a star map straight out of Mass Effect – no Call of Duty is quite like this. Players seemed to reject it because it did too much different, and admittedly, the multiplayer isn’t as focused or grounded as previous entries, but it has one of the very best campaigns of the whole series. No, seriously, Infinite Warfare is excellent."

1. 13: "Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare is one of the more underrated games in the series, but it also has plenty of faults. The game was probably not given a fair shake as it was immediately hated with the reveal trailer being most disliked gaming video of all-time. Part of this is because players didn’t have any interest in a space-based Call of Duty game, but this turned out to be one of its biggest strengths. Infinite Warfare continued to evolve the advanced movement of Black Ops 3 and Advanced Warfare with jet packs, wall-running, and now, zero gravity gunfights. ... The campaign is arguably the best in the franchise as you go across the galaxy, getting into massive space battles that have the epic scope and scale of a Call of Duty single player story. You could even take on side missions which allowed you to take down high ranking enemies out in space in special operations. On top of that, the narrative itself was rich and filled with great characters and emotional moments. It was a real surprise, but we’ll likely never see any kind of follow-up. ... The multiplayer was a bit less exciting as it felt like it borrowed too heavily from Black Ops 3 and didn’t do enough to set itself apart beyond having some maps set in space. The maps the game did feature weren’t anything to write home about and it was easy to abandon Infinite Warfare‘s multiplayer within a couple of months, if not a matter of weeks."

WW2

1. 8: praised game for going back to the series' WW2 roots; "The game's campaign was praised for its Band of Brothers-style narrative," commended multiplayer's return to its Division system in place of create-a-class and its Destiny-like social space called Headquarters

1. 20: "[after returning to the series' ww2 roots], "the game came out and didn’t deliver. The launch was a mess that included problems with servers and hit detection. Divisions for loadouts felt like a Battlefield feature, and weapons were widely imbalanced. Even the maps were poorly designed and Gustav Cannon was the cherry on top as one of the worst arenas in the franchise. War mode was the one saving grace for Multiplayer when the game dropped, and it was well-received as a new mode. After the initial launch, Sledgehammer Games cleaned up some of the post-launch content. But for a COD game, it was too little too late."

1. 7: "After nearly a decade in modern warfare and the future, Call of Duty returned to where it began in 2017 with Call of Duty: WWII. Set in the European theater and featuring the famous Normandy invasion, it felt like Call of Duty 2 has been remade for the next generation of players. This came with some feeling of déjà vu, but the better characterization and an emotional conclusion helped it from feeling like a basic nostalgia-grab. The multiplayer also shifted away from the excess of its predecessors, focusing on pure boots-on-the-ground combat without compromising the strides the series had made. Its convoluted progression system, however, didn’t work as well, and the Zombie mode felt out of place in an otherwise serious game."

1. 12: "the WW2 setting make the game feel jaded, but it actually had some fresh ideas, most of them in the campaign."; campaign is enjoyable but forgettable upon completion; "The multiplayer was a bizarre experiment from Sledgehammer, a soft reboot of sorts just before Modern Warfare came along. A social area for WW2 has players crowded around the beach at Normandy, as loot boxes fall from the sky to bestow gifts upon players. It would be grotesque if it wasn’t so outright bizarre."; "Elsewhere, multiplayer is decent but feels too modern, a trap that every World War 2-set Call of Duty seems to fall into since 2007’s Modern Warfare: everything feels slick and modern, with red dots and lasers strapped to 1940s weaponry. Wouldn’t it be better to get some gunplay with a bit of heft to it? Still, it’s possible to have a great time if you load dragon’s breath rounds into your shotgun and go to town. ... A strong entry, but not quite strong enough to land it in the big 10"

1. 9: "It might seem odd for Call of Duty: WW2 to go back to the Second World War after so much future stuff and the previous game's trip into space (read our Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare review for more on that one), but it works. The reset of all the future tech bring the series back down to its roots and more or less acts like a reboot. The single player suffers a little in the opening half narratively but, for the most part, hits those big set piece moments confidently. It's the multiplayer that really wins here though. Without all the gadgets, tech and spacey stuff this is a much purer expression of what an online shooter should be. Stripped of the drones and satellites the action focuses much more on reactions and spacial awareness and is much more rewarding for it. The new Headquarters mode is also an interesting addition, creating a Destiny Tower like social space for players to hang out in."

1. 7: "World War II put the Call of Duty series on the map, but the franchise actually took a break from the setting for almost a decade until this 2017 release. That long hiatus paid off, though. You might only play as a single private throughout the campaign, but that smaller focus on the interactions amongst a single squad on Western Front following D-Day makes for one of the most emotional campaigns in the series."; "Turning the clock back to World War II also gave developer Sledgehammer Games the opportunity to incorporate a lot of the advances the series embraced over the years, like a class system and a Headquarters social space while retaining the authentic weaponry and maps of the era. And then there’s a new Nazi Zombies mode. As fun as the various Zombies modes have been over the years, still nothing quite tops mowing down hordes of Nazi Zombies."

1. 19: "It was just far too ambitious for its own good, ultimately making it suffer in the end."; "Between the Headquarters never working correctly, the new 'War' game mode being somewhat of a disappointment, and the campaign falling a bit flat, it just has too many blunders to climb any further on the list. While it was a blast to revisit the World War II setting, we wish it would have nailed everything it set out to do."

1. 14: "It’d been a few years since the last COD game set in World War 2, so WWII takes us back there. What more do you need?"

1. 14: "Call of Duty: WWII was the franchise’s return to World War II for the first time in close to a decade. Fans had been yearning for this for quite a while and it was actually pretty serviceable. While it didn’t blow anyone’s socks off, it was the return to boots on the ground gameplay fans had wanted after a few years of futuristic titles. The Zombies had more of a horror focus than previous years, the campaign provided more of a Band of Brothers angle on a war the series had covered in-depth many times, and the multiplayer tried to take things back to basics, providing for a standard, but solid Call of Duty experience. ... WWII doesn’t do a whole lot to notably innovate beyond a social hub space in multiplayer, but many players found it cumbersome and obnoxious when they just wanted to load directly into a match without having to watch 20 people open crappy loot boxes on the side of a beach."

BO4

1. 9: "one of the best games in the series to date"; multiplayer "as good as ever", zombies "offered up a deep, memorable experience full of secrets to uncover as you lay waste to hordes of the undead", biggest praise to Blackout

1. 10: "Black Ops 4 brought the end of an era to Call of Duty. It marked the final game between the Warzone era and the Golden Age of COD that had a distinct engine for so long. The game brought Specialists back over from Black Ops 3, only this time they were boots on the ground. Health regeneration was dictated by stims, and ballistics were introduced to many of the weapons. All of this was an attempt to set up the first iteration of a battle royale, known as Blackout. Despite not having any campaign whatsoever, the Multiplayer component of the game was well-made. Guns felt impactful, Specialists were implemented the right way, and maps were competitive. Many players remember BO4 as the game with no campaign that was the final nail. But the Multiplayer alone places this among the better CODs."

1. 14: "Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 could have been the game to kill the franchise. For the first time in the main series, Black Ops 4 opted to leave the campaign mode out completely, offering competitive multiplayer, Zombies, and the battle royale mode Blackout instead. Treyarch’s over-the-top approach to storytelling was missed, but the studio managed to deliver one of the best multiplayer modes in the series’ history, along with plenty of Zombies content for fans. It was Blackout that sealed the deal, however. The series’s first crack at battle royale was a huge success, blending classic Call of Duty shooting mechanics with the slow and methodical gameplay from PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds. The mode even mixed in classic settings from the earlier games, as well as a section filled with Zombies ready to tear you limb from limb."

1. 19: "Despite Black Ops being one of the most beloved single-player Call of Duty campaigns, Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 ditched the single-player campaign and its ’70s setting to go for a near-future multiplayer shooter that, frankly, sucked."; "The story was delivered instead in the game’s multiplayer, although you would be forgiven for missing it as you ran around at 500 mph, desperately trying to avoid getting killed by the all-new specialists and their ridiculous signature weapons."; "It’s mostly notable for Blackout, a battle royale mode that was an early attempt at Warzone, and for Specialist Ajax’s 9-bang, a flashbang that detonates multiple times and served as a tremendously funny fuck you to camping enemies."

1. 19: criticized multiplayer as too similar to BO3 and manual healing; found Blackout inferior to other battle royal Fortnite and PUB:G, and its successor Warzone

1. 9: "go on to be one of the series' most successful and beloved installments, even with its apparent issues."; "With the introduction of Blackout, Call of Duty's first Battle Royale mode, the return of 'boots on the ground' combat, and an excellent Zombies mode, Black Ops 4 is hard to hate on, even if you are someone who enjoys checking out the campaign every year. While Warzone pushed Blackout out of the way and out of our minds, it will forever live in our hearts as a solid Call of Duty Battle Royale experience"

1. 13: "Black Ops 4 dropped the campaign entirely and instead gave us one of the biggest multiplayer overhauls we’d ever seen, on top of the Blackout battle royale mode. "

1. 15: "Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 was yet another attempt to shake up the Call of Duty formula. For the first and so far only time ever, a Call of Duty game was launched without a campaign, something a lot of players were pretty upset about. It was just Zombies, multiplayer, and Blackout, the first attempt at a battle royale in the franchise. For what it was, it was a worthy attempt. Blackout is a much more arcade-y battle royale than Warzone, but it didn’t find the same level of success given it was paywalled to Black Ops 4 and Warzone is free and very accessible. ... The multiplayer itself was fun, but it didn’t fit into the vision of what Call of Duty should be for a lot of people. It continued to focus on Specialists, a system from Black Ops 3 that gave characters special abilities that they could charge up and use for maximum effect. Black Ops 4 also increased the health 10 150 and took away auto health regen, so players had to manually heal themselves. It was an interesting idea and showed that the series was willing to experiment. However, given this was the last time we saw anything like this, it may have strayed too far from the Call of Duty formula and started to feel like it belonged in a different franchise."

MW19

1. 2: praised campaign for its memorable missions; "The multiplayer in Modern Warfare was celebrated for its great diversity of maps and modes, and for introducing large-scale warfare with vehicles and bigger maps. The gunplay was once again excellent, and the bones of the game--the proprietary Modern Warfare engine--tied things together in a cohesive way."

1. 3: "best campaign since BO1" with its memorable moments and missions; "Modern Warfare’s multiplayer was decent too, and tried to evolve one of the most beloved multiplayer games of all time to the modern day with some nice additions, but its implementation wasn’t perfect. That said, its new modes like Realism and the 2v2 Gunfight were great."

1. 18: "The Modern Warfare reboot was a massive turning point for the series, regardless of the ranking. It would bring a resurgence in players that the series hadn’t experienced for years, at the cost of irreparable harm to the Multiplayer modes. The gameplay was far more grounded, the engine was upgraded, the campaign missions were thrilling to play, and this was even the game that introduced Warzone. Unfortunately, it was all for the worse. With a more grounded take on gameplay came the addition of rat players who loved hiding in corners with no downsides. Remember Dead Silence? It was nerfed. How about Ghost? It got buffed. Even the maps were entirely designed for random kills. To make matters worse, Prestige Mode was removed and the camo grind was one of the most punishing in the franchise. MW 2019 led to worse games down the road."

1. 4: "Confused by a game called Call of Duty: Modern Warfare appearing on our list alongside Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare? It gets even more confusing when you discover that the games share characters but are not narratively connected aside from the mention of a few events. Regardless of the naming conventions, the rebooted 2019 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare nails the atmosphere and tense first-person action of the older games’ campaigns, complete with several set-piece moments and a generous sprinkling of stealth. Modern Warfare doesn’t disappoint as a multiplayer game, either, building on the foundation of its predecessors while adding new mechanics, such as reloading while aiming down the sights. Its straightforward progression system emphasizes continued play and doesn’t include microtransactions for unlocking any weapons. The new massive mode Ground War is a fantastic addition to its multiplayer offerings that should satisfy those left in the cold by DICE’s decision to skip a 2019 Battlefield release."

1. 3: "This game mixed things up, and made everything feel fresh again: gone was the boiling world war that ended the original trilogy, and in its place was a quiet skulk through a house in Camden, looking for terrorists in the wake of a terrorist attack."; "Gunsmithing makes Modern Warfare‘s arsenal feel huge and lets you personalise guns to your own needs, while the maps are excellent. Firefights around the stalled busses in Piccadilly Circus, or through underground caves, all feel solid, while the fidelity afforded to these means that firefights feel close to overwhelming sometimes. ... Modern Warfare‘s team had an impossible mission: to make Call of Duty cool again. They pulled it off."

1. 7: "Leave it to the Call of Duty franchise to release a game with the exact same name as a 2007 title that isn't a remake of any of the games in the series, but is instead a wild reimagining that begins to rebuild the Modern Warfare series from the ground up. 2019's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare differs from its predecessors in that it doesn't feel like a series of disparate missions that line up to be shot down back-to-back without much contemplation. It feels like you're behind the reins of a tight action movie racing ahead at breakneck speed. It looks good, it sounds good, and it feels good. It's just a shame that, while a great first step to genuinely refreshing the Modern Warfare franchise, its two sequels just aren't as good."

1. 6: "This is one of the tightest campaigns in the franchise with a gritty tone that separates it from the original trilogy (even if the story isn’t quite as morally gray as it was originally touted). This was also the first title that significantly adjusted the gunplay. Each weapon feels like it has some real weight, giving each shot some impact. That’s a more welcome addition for the multiplayer, which also includes some interesting options to make modes feel more realistic. And of course, this was the game to debut Warzone. It may not have even been the series’ first attempt at a battle royal game, but it’s hard to deny that the mode can be a lot of fun. ... Unfortunately, some weaker multiplayer maps hold Modern Warfare back from being at the very top of this list, but it’s easily the best CoD game of the last decade."

1. 5: "Leading off the top five is quite fitting, seeing how CoD 4 barely missed it, and that's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, the 2019 installment that rebooted the beloved sub-genre to astonishing heights. The graphical fidelity, the ultra-realism mode for the campaign, the intense and redefined multiplayer, and the introduction of Warzone make this one of the best Call of Duty titles in recent memory and as a whole."; "Even with people's growing annoyance and disdain for the franchise, everyone seemed to stop in their tracks and admire what Modern Warfare brought to the table, which is an achievement in and of itself. We always felt that Modern Warfare got cheated with the aggressive yearly release cycle of Call of Duty titles, and it seems Activision also thought the same, seeing how Modern Warfare 2 (2022) will have an extra year to breathe."

1. 9: "The 2019 reboot of the Modern Warfare franchise – you can tell because there’s no “4” in the title – gave COD one of its biggest graphical and mechanical overhauls ever, making everything feel weighty and look more realistic than ever. This has now become the standard for COD titles, and is one of the most striking shooters you can play today."

1. 9: "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is the first time the series has ever done any kind of “reboot”. After a handful of years of futuristic games, fans were demanding a new Modern Warfare game. Instead of doing exactly what had been done before, Infinity Ward opted for a more “realistic” approach, prompting a story that was smaller in scope, but arguably a bit more tense in some regards. The developer was interested in a game that more closely reflected the times we live in, where terrorist attacks can happen without someone wearing their flag on their sleeve. Anyone in the crowd could theoretically be an enemy and that is a truly terrifying thought. While some of its themes are a bit surface level, it’s a worthy attempt at a new take on the Modern Warfare name with an excellent new interpretation of Captain Price. ... The multiplayer also laid the foundation for Warzone, one of the most popular and beloved battle royale games out there. While some innovations such as doors could be done without, Modern Warfare came at the right time for the Call of Duty series and was exactly what a lot of people were looking for."

BO Cold War

1. 10: "Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War sets itself apart from other entries in the legendary franchise by how much it excels when your gun is actually holstered. While Call of Duty is obviously known for its world-class shootouts with explosions around every corner and edge-of-your-seat moments, Black Ops Cold War added another wrinkle to that formula."; praise campaign for its quiet moments that make louder ones "more impactful"; multiplayer "fell a little short" but highlighted zombies mode despite a lack of content, "but it provided highly polished and tense gameplay sessions we still think about today."

1. 11: "As a complete package, Black Ops Cold War is the best game from the Warzone era. Of course, it happens to be the most like classic COD games and wasn’t yet moved to the new engine introduced in 2019. After a year in which Infinity Ward catered to slow gameplay, the infinite sprint and classic perks found in Cold War were a welcome return. The campaign was average, but Zombies was the best third mode in the current era. What held the game back was fatigue, poor weapon balance, and maps that were decent at best. Some were far too big to make room for the new large-scale modes while others maintained an awkward flow on three-lane maps. Eight maps was a laughably low launch number that was only exacerbated by the skill-based matchmaking system, which quickly became obvious in the new era."

1. 13: "The reason Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War is a noteworthy entry is because it’s the first game in the series available on PS5 and Xbox Series X|S. It ended up having plenty of content across Multiplayer and Zombies, with lots of callbacks to the original Black Ops games. Unfortunately, this game didn’t benefit much from being on the new consoles, as it looked muddy, and never felt on par with the level of quality from past games. It’s definitely worth playing, especially if you’re into Warzone (as the games share progression systems), but ultimately, this will end up being forgotten about."

1. 8: "a masterful [story] with a few interesting mechanical quirks: trying to solve puzzles in an ’80s safehouse in Berlin is memorable, and shootouts inside locations like a Russian recreation of small town America are some of the best moments Call of Duty has to offer."; "The campaign, sadly, is short and vanishes before it wears out its welcome. This is one of the bigger reasons Cold War doesn’t rank higher in the list – that, and the multiplayer lets things down. Coming directly after 2019’s Modern Warfare reinvented the wheel, Cold War‘s multiplayer often feels infuriating and never delivers the same serotonin hit as either version of the Modern Warfare franchise."

1. 9: "By the time Black Ops Cold War was released in 2020, more than a little Call of Duty fatigue had started to set in. This is not a title that revolutionized the series, but the campaign actually does innovate a bit, with missions that require more sneaking than running and gunning, clearly taking inspiration from the likes of GoldenEye 007. There’s even a neat story twist straight out of Bioshock."; "Despite being the fifth Black Ops title, the multiplayer is more streamlined than a lot of other CoD games, with more limited options closer to the first two Black Ops games as opposed to the often bloated sequels. Maps are also on the smaller side, as is the leaner Zombies mode. Cold War may not be the most popular Call of Duty game, but for a more recent title, it’s actually one of the most accessible."

1. 14: "At some point in time, there was a shift where Call of Duty went from taking a serious approach to peering into historical events to turning into an adrenaline-induced action movie fit with over-the-top setpieces and constant chaos. Black Ops Cold War is the embodiment of the whacky side of Call of Duty, which is more than welcomed here."

1. 11: "The wordiest title in Call of Duty history, Black Ops Cold War brought back the Black Ops subfranchise but lost a lot of the heart. This is a solid campaign and decent multiplayer experience, but nothing to write home about."

1. 7: "Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War took us back to the subfranchise’s roots after a handful of entries in the far-flung future. It once again returns to the world of political espionage, allowing players to immerse themselves in one of the most suspenseful times in American history thanks to the constant threat of nuclear war. The story was filled with great moments such as when you infiltrate the KGB HQ and must maintain your undercover status while making choices both in and out of dialogue. The game also had multiple endings, including one where you become the villain and set off a series of nukes across the world and frames America and the CIA as being responsible for it. ... The multiplayer also provided a strong contrast to Modern Warfare, which came out a year prior. For those looking for a more arcade-y experience and something less tactical, Black Ops Cold War was the perfect solution. It felt like a nice throwback to the multiplayer of early Black Ops games while still moving the needle forward to feel “modern” and keeping the pace of the Call of Duty franchise’s evolution."

Vanguard

1. 10: "While Vanguard didn't reach the same heights as some other modern entries in the franchise, it did provide a welcome reprieve to the "modern" and futuristic entries we've seen in recent years. Vanguard was a well-rounded Call of Duty package, with moments of genuine brilliance in all three of its core gameplay modes: campaign, competitive multiplayer, and Zombies."

• "Like most Call of Duty games nowadays, the campaign was a brief but action-packed tour of combat told through multiple perspectives. Though not the strongest from a story perspective, Vanguard's missions were varied and consistently entertaining. The multiplayer, which continues to expand, features an impressive mix of maps and game variants, which makes for an experience that has been fun since launch and will likely remain popular until the next Call of Duty game releases. The Zombies mode removed some of the clever puzzle aspects from the formula, but it's nonetheless an enjoyable cooperative experience. Overall, Vanguard is a solid entry in the Call of Duty franchise, even if it feels a tad safe."

1. 22 (last): "Although it had some decent gameplay, Vanguard encapsulates so much of what is wrong with the current era of COD: It doesn’t add anything worth keeping for future titles, the campaign was one of the worst in the series at the time, and Zombies was a rushed third mode. Multiplayer was the one redeeming quality, which also contained many problems; maps were poorly designed and littered with destructible walls or windows. Then you add a bloated attachments system, and the game is simply too much. Maps and loadouts can make or break a COD game. Vanguard failed at both."

1. 11: "Call of Duty: Vanguard is an interesting entry in the series because it has a lot of memorable features, especially for Multiplayer mode. It sends players back to World War II, which is a downside since Call of Duty has taken place during that era far too often. You can skip the single-player campaign and the Zombies modes entirely, but if you’re into Multiplayer, you’ll likely enjoy this game — even more so after it gets updated. One of the best things about Vanguard is the degree of customization, as you’re able to utilize up to 10 attachments on most weapons. The majority of the primary weapons have 70 attachments to unlock, giving you plenty of ways to build weapons how you’d like. Though, in turn, this does mean the game feels a bit too grindy at times, but veteran players will likely welcome the sheer amount of things to do."

1. 9: "Vanguard hits a lot of the same notes as the other recent World War 2 Call of Duty games, but gets a higher position due to its inclusion of the Gunsmith customisation system and a fairly robust destruction mechanic that allows players in campaign and multiplayer to absolutely shred the world around them."; "the performances are good and you get to do a lot of fun set pieces, it’s just a shame the campaign doesn’t really spend a lot of time exploring how this team works together and instead has characters blubbing over the death of friends, family and commanding officers until it all comes to a satisfying conclusion."; "The multiplayer is good fun, albeit with the same problem as WW2: using modern customisation options with era-inappropriate options, giving players the option to create some truly cursed guns without really adding any mechanical support to the fact we’re in WW2."

1. 11: "If only judged by its campaign, Vanguard would actually be quite a bit higher on this. Despite being yet another Call of Duty game set in World War II, it does quite a bit to distinguish itself. Focusing on a small group of soldiers on a secret mission and showing flashbacks to how they got to this point in the war gives Vanguard‘s campaign a much more cinematic feel than most other titles in the series. And the stealth-focused mission in Stalingrad stands out as one of the very best in any Call of Duty game."; "Unfortunately, things go off the rails when you delve into multiplayer. The maps are actually quite good, it’s just that nothing else really does much to stand out from even Call of Duty: WWII, which had been released only four years prior. Even the Zombies mode has frustratingly little content compared to other games. Vanguard is a solid game that just doesn’t have much staying power."

1. 17: "it is an utterly underwhelming experience on all fronts. The campaign and Zombies modes feel lifeless, putting all the weight and pressure on Warzone and its multiplayer component... which also underwhelms."; "There are some redeeming qualities here, like the return of Ranked Play or some of the map design, but the weapon balancing, awful Zombies, and bland campaign make it a hard pill to swallow."

1. 18: "Another historical retread, but somehow more boring than ever, in pretty much every conceivable way."

1. 19: "Call of Duty: Vanguard is one of the first times it became visibly clear the Call of Duty machine was not as well-oiled as it used to be. It was heavily reported that Call of Duty: Vanguard was the result of new games in the series being internally delayed/canceled and developers being moved around on projects. Since a new Call of Duty is expected every year, Vanguard appeared to be something that was slapped together to hit a release date. The campaign was largely forgettable and while not anything awful, it was uninspired and missing that cinematic Call of Duty flair. The whole story is told largely through flashbacks as you see individual stories for each member of a team, but you don’t get to see said team in action until the very last mission. It feels like a bunch of missions that were created in a vacuum and then Sledgehammer Games had to try and stitch them together. ... In addition to that, the multiplayer felt like a World War II version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019) with a lot of cheap innovations to make it feel new. There were things like some destructible walls, but these were so selectively implemented that it didn’t feel very exciting or worth hyping up. On top of that, the Zombies mode was a disaster and didn’t have any round-based content for months after launch. All in all, Vanguard was clearly rushed and a signal to Activision that it needs to be more careful without pushing things out the door."

MWII (22)

1. 11: "remembered for its thrilling campaign and excellent multiplayer"; "The multiplayer didn't reinvent the wheel, but it honed in on what people loved about previous games, delivering a "classic" feel. Ground War returned, offering up Battlefield-style large-scale action in 32v32 matches, and the Invasion mode was a particularly bright spot for players who just wanted a huge Team Deathmatch mode."

1. 21: criticized it for its slow gameplay; "Mobility, such as jump shots and slides, was heavily penalized, and Snaking, which is when players quickly move between prone to crouch behind cover, had no limitations. Mix that with the useless Dead Silence and busted Ghost perks, and camping was the name of the game. CODs are about map awareness and the ability to move with constant adrenaline. Modern Warfare II took those ideas and threw them out the window. At least the camo grind was one of the best in the series."

1. 10: "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II is a noteworthy installment based on its name alone, serving as a sequel to 2019’s Modern Warfare. While the two play similarly and even share a setting, Modern Warfare II is a clear step backward for the franchise, particularly due to its Multiplayer mechanics that tend to favor a slower pace. Its campaign mode is absolutely worth playing, but if you’re someone who likes to enjoy the full package, including Multiplayer, Spec Ops, and single-player modes, you might be disappointed with this one. Activision has also dropped the ball in terms of support, so the game feels like an incomplete package compared to previous installments."

1. 6: "It’s got no shortage of blockbuster setpieces, but Modern Warfare 2‘s campaign truly shines in its moments of restraint"; "As for the multiplayer, Modern Warfare 2 offers a big step up to 2021’s Vanguard: weapons feel responsive and deadly, while new game modes like Prisoner Rescue offer a compelling middle ground between high stakes Search and Destroy games and more traditional death matches. While some disappointing map design cast a damper on Modern Warfare 2, the rebooted sequel is proof that Infinity Ward remains one of the best FPS developers in the business."

1. 10: "With Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, Infinity Ward used the past as a point-of-reference rather than a blueprint. The result is a thrilling campaign which doesn't rewrite the rulebook, necessarily, though it does reinforce the rules of engagement for Call of Duty in a new generation. Action is fast and frantic, positioning is more important than ever before, and death comes quickly to those relying on the old ways of playing – if you have a tendency to lean heavily on the left stick and reload after every round that leaves your clip, you'll be at a disadvantage here. This game doesn't necessarily do anything that you haven't seen Call of Duty do before, but it's a great time with incredible visual/audio design. "

1. 15: "The multiplayer is fast and furious as usual, but the handful of new modes here just feel like slight tweaks on what’s already been done."; "The campaign is not bad, but it’s hard not to feel like you’re just going through the motions, replaying the greatest hits of past CoD games. Whereas the original Modern Warfare 2 had a really awesome ending, this one has an unusually frustrating final mission where you have to avoid endless enemies while constantly pausing to neutralize a missile. It’s hard not to get the vibe that this is a pale imitation of one of the best games in the series coasting on its popular name. Even if it’s a mixed bag overall, at least the graphics are fantastic."

1. 8: "Despite being a direct sequel to one of the best modern-era Call of Duty titles ever created, 2022's Modern Warfare 2 felt a bit underwhelming in comparison, offering a half-baked Co-Op mode at launch, a worse campaign overall, and a multiplayer mode that was on-par with its predecessor for better or worse."; "Perhaps not the worst game overall. Its Ranked Play was pretty fun and rewarding. It just felt like it lacked the overall polish and focus of the initial reboot, having us place it several tiers below it and some of the other titles in the series that surpass it convincingly. It's not a terrible Call of Duty by any stretch, but it certainly isn't the best."

1. 7: "The most recent COD game (at the time of writing) is actually one of the very best. No, really: Modern Warfare II’s campaign is a rollercoaster, with each level offering a different gameplay option. One mission you’ll be sneaking through Amsterdam’s canals while silently taking out foes, while in another you’ll be hopping between cars as part of a huge convoy of vehicles. It’s exciting stuff, and almost makes up for the fact that the multiplayer and its updates have been… rough."

1. 18: "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022) may have been one of the most commercially successful Call of Duty games, but that doesn’t really mean much for its quality. Given the game (and the marketing) evoked the name of one of the greatest shooters of all-time, it had a lot to live up to. Unfortunately, the story features a weak, lackluster story that fails to utilize any kind of dramatic tension, features poor attempts to recreate big moments from the original Modern Warfare 2, and has too many missions with some poorly fleshed out gimmick at the center of it. It’s a big mess and that continues into its multiplayer as well. ... The multiplayer features some of the worst maps the series has ever seen, the time to kill is inconsistent and way too fast, the movement is heavy and slow, and the weapon progression system is borderline incomprehensible. The fact that the game makes you level up entirely different weapons so you can unlock the things you want for the gun you actually want to use is sort of inconceivable. It’s a pretty rocky Call of Duty game and it’s hard to imagine anyone willingly playing it over Modern Warfare 3 (2023)."

MWIII (23)

1. 12: "Modern Warfare III was facing plenty of heat before it was ever released. This was the first COD that would transfer all of the content from the previous game. Rumors were swirling early on in 2023 that Modern Warfare II would be a two-year game with a major DLC drop. That DLC became a full-priced game that was built on the same foundation. Some players looked at this like a rip-off that wasn’t worth buying because it was a glorified DLC. The early access campaign was only a few hours long and an entire list of remastered maps didn’t help that sentiment. Despite all the flaws, the Multiplayer experience for Modern Warfare III ended up being enjoyable because of the movement alone. Players who gave the Multiplayer a chance were rewarded with one of the better titles outside of the top 10."

1. 19: "Modern Warfare III was meant to mark the 20th anniversary of the franchise but ultimately fell flat and is one of the most disappointing launches in the series history. A lackluster campaign relied too much on nostalgia, got lazy with Open Combat Missions that were basically single-player Warzone missions, and was overall too generic to be exciting. While the multiplayer aspect of the game was as fun as always, this was the first COD entry to launch without any new, original maps, instead settling for map remakes from MW3 (2011)."

1. 16: "this dull reimagining of Infinity Ward’s original Modern Warfare trilogy felt utterly phoned-in. Despite the return of series villain Makarov, Modern Warfare 3‘s single-player campaign is both lifeless and shockingly short. Meanwhile, Zombies took COD fans’ favourite undead-blasting game mode and turned it into a limp extraction shooter."; "The fact that Modern Warfare 3 continued on from 2022’s Modern Warfare 2 meant that multiplayer was a surprisingly balanced affair from day one. Yet even the return of iconic maps from 2009 couldn’t stop this entry from feeling like it should have been an expansion, not a full game."

1. 15: "At its core, 2023's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 isn't a terrible game, as it is built off two of the best installments in the series while giving us back the fluid and fast gameplay that its predecessors took away. But it falls a bit flat when taking everything else into consideration."; "This campaign is arguably the worst it's ever been, and the same can be said for the Zombies and Warzone. And, while the Multiplayer is pretty fun, the map selection being nothing but original Modern Warfare 2 maps makes the price point hard to swallow. There are redeeming qualities about this game for sure, but not enough to place it any higher."

1. 20: "This game's campaign has a handful of original missions, but it's mostly a bunch of DMZ missions strung together with cutscenes. The classic Zombies mode has also been turned into a knock-off DMZ variation. Even the multiplayer adds the minimal amount of content, and relies on classic maps to prop things up. Developers were crunched to make this, and Activision executives continue to get paid millions per year. The most depressing title in the entire series."

1. 10: "The newest game on this list, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, is an interesting one. A lot of complaints have been understandably raised about the game being aesthetically very similar to 2022’s Modern Warfare 2. Some have suggested it’s nothing more than a DLC repackaged as a $70 game and that’s more than fair to say. However, for Call of Duty lovers, the multiplayer does make a lot of gameplay changes that fans have been demanding for years. It’s incredibly fast, smooth, and also brings back all of the classic original Modern Warfare 2 maps in all their former glory. ... The campaign is probably the biggest detractor for Modern Warfare 3 as it's the shortest in the series and is clearly yet another rushed story. It does a great disservice to some of the franchise’s greatest characters and leans way too hard into half-baked sandbox missions using the original Warzone map. However, the multiplayer is so strong this time around that it’s hard to let the campaign bring it down too much."

BO6

1. 6: "one of the best--and most varied--campaigns in the series to date"; best campaign since Black Ops 1; praised new omnimovement system in multiplayer

1. 9: "Treyarch had four years to cook with Black Ops 6, and the extra time was well worth it. There is no doubt that BLOPS 6 is one of the best Call of Duty games since Black Ops 3, and that is owed to the classic approach to the content. The campaign was fantastic, the classic prestige levels made a return, and Zombies launched with two great maps. Sure, some of the Multiplayer maps had weak designs, like Scud or Red Card, because they appeared to be made for a Warzone-like structure. However, the omni-movement gameplay was arcade COD at its best, and players got to follow one of the more satisfying camo grinds while they were at it. The Golden Age titles may be out of reach for BLOPS 6, but the game held its own."

1. 12: "Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 is a mixed bag that hits some of the highest highs of the franchise in its killer campaign while simultaneously continuing its trend of frustrating multiplayer woes. Thankfully, the former more than makes up for the latter for those seeking a rock-solid spy thriller, and its Zombies mode is a great time with a group of friends. This game also introduced omnimovement, allowing players to sprint and slide in any direction, ushering in a whole new era of movement-based gameplay for the franchise. Time will tell if this choice lands with players and continues to be a part of the series going forward."

1. 3: "When it comes to the series' boldest campaigns, the Black Ops games are usually up there, mixing Mission Impossible-like spy thriller energy with trippy sequences that make you question what's even real. Here in Call Of Duty: Black Ops 6, the story picks up from the fifth game in the series, Call Of Duty: Black Ops – Cold War, moving the action to the 90s during the Gulf War. While there's plenty of links to real-life history, this serves more as set-dressing for a conspiracy theory plot that mixes non-linear levels, a thrilling heist, and some genuine psychological horror. To top it off, the multiplayer is better than ever. Fast-paced "omnimovement" allows for great control over slides and dives, while avoiding the messier jump-happy overcorrection from the preceding entry in the series (read our Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 review for why!). If that's not enough, with two excellent Zombies maps at launch teeming with secrets, there's never a dull moment in this triumphant return to form."

Bonus: Warzone

1. 3: "Released in March 2020 at the onset of the real-world pandemic, Warzone aimed to earn its place in the increasingly busy battle royale space by offering something no other game could. Call of Duty's trademark gunplay, weapons, and the "feel" that the game provides is unmatched, and applied to a battle royale setting, the game thrived."

1. 6: "Although Warzone is not one of the yearly releases for the COD franchise, it’s impossible to ignore. Regardless of whether players love battle royale or hate what it’s done to Multiplayer, there is no denying that it’s had a lasting impact on the series. Modern Warfare 2019 was popular enough when it was released, but it was the launch of the initial Warzone that skyrocketed the series yet again during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, Warzone has been integrated with every new mainline Call of Duty; they have cross-progression levels, some shared weapons, and familiar characters. Fans who love the battle royale genre mixed with classic arcade FPS found a new home in this game. However, many fans of the series overall began to resent the mode over time as it changed Multiplayer for the worse. Now Resurgence is the main mode for Warzone, which separates it from other games in the genre and leaves more room for Multiplayer."

1. 6 Warzone 2.0: "Call of Duty Warzone 2.0 is a brand-new beast in the franchise, unlike anything else on this list. Most importantly, even though it's from a couple of years back, it's stull up-to-date. A direct response to the shifting multiplayer environment defined by free-to-play battle royales like Fortnite and Apex Legends, this is a distinctly Call of Duty take on the genre. It streamlines the loot system, adds an ingenious way to rejoin the fight in the Gulag, and slices through the somewhat monotonous world of battle royales with a dang tac knife. Warzone 2.0 dropped alongside 2022's Modern Warfare 2, edging out predecessor Call of Duty: Warzone Caldera in the process, and with a dedicated single-player DMZ mode if you're looking for a more narrative-based experience, it's a clear improvement."

Sources

• Gamespot
• IGN
• Complex
• Digital Trends
• NME - does not mention zombies weirdly
• GamesRadar+
• Den of Geek
• TheGamer
• Sports Illustrated
• ComicBook.com