AT1738
February 2023
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bethany Hamilton have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bethany Hamilton was changed by AT1738 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888367 on 2023-02-10T02:53:15+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
editHi AT1738! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 22:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! AT1738 (talk) 22:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
edit
You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 22:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey!!
editI mean it when I say stick around the Cole article. Its been pretty unwelcoming to new folks and I don't want it you to get scared off. Entering the conversation with background knowledge IS such a good thing! We could absolutely use more of it as at times it feels lacking. Filiforme1312 (talk) 00:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! I don't support her, but I do want to get shit right about her, especially very basic stuff like her birthday/age and her legal name once it becomes public knowledge, y'know? AT1738 (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
March 2023
edit Hello, I'm Miner Editor. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maia arson crimew have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Miner Editor (talk) 03:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was just checking if I could still edit or not, thank you for letting me know. AT1738 (talk) 03:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)