Akariprescott

Welcome

Hello Akariprescott and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. Captainllama (talk) 01:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Dune: Messiah (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dune: Messiah (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Draft:Untitled Dune: Part Two sequel is far better developed and referenced, and a final decision on the title apparently hasn't been made yet. The poster is also clearly marked as fan-made.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 22:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Undiscussed article page moves

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to User:Never Flinch. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the Backrooms film

Hi, I noticed that you’re trying to create a new article for The Backrooms (film) after your previous version was made into a redirect. First, I wanted to inform you that there already is a draft for that article at Draft:The Backrooms (film). If you like you could make improvements there. Second, it was previously decided by other editors that it was best to wait until filming has begun before we have an article for the film as there is little info about the film’s production. We ask that you wait before creating the article. User:Rusted AutoParts,User:Wikishovel,User:Not0nshoree Key limes (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Liminal horror (genre) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liminal horror (genre) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liminal horror (genre) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 00:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Skye Riley (fictional character)

Hello, Akariprescott,

Thank you for creating Skye Riley (fictional character).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Is an article on one character from a minor film really warranted? Would this not be better a couple of lines in the article on Smile 2?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello!

Smile 2 isn't actually a minor film, especially when it comes to social media platforms. It has garnered 90.7 million in the box office to this date, with the movie still remaining in theaters. A blockbuster is a movie that exceeds 100 million, which Smile 2 is fairly close to. I made this page for the people who wanted to know more about the character herself rather than the movie. Skye Riley is considered a pretty high-status character on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. By making this page, people can search for the character's details and won't have to scroll through the movie article to find it. I also think that filling a big chunk of the movie article looks unprofessional, since it will then reach an absurd amount of information.

I get your confusion, though. Akariprescott (talk) 15:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Skye Riley (fictional character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skye Riley (fictional character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skye Riley (fictional character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

MOS:CITIZEN

Regarding your edits to Lupita Nyong'o, please read MOS:CITIZEN. Nyong'o's situation is complex, which is why it's explained in the subsequent paragraph in the lede. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at House (TV series). --Yamla (talk) 12:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Yamla (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

January 2025

As you obviously haven't the slightest intention of abiding by our policies around proper sourcing of content, I have blocked you indefinitely. I would oppose any unblock unless you agree to a WP:TOPICBAN around genres and unless you agree to properly WP:CITE (with reliable sources) all future edits. --Yamla (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)