Nomination of Ontario Options for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ontario Options is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontario Options until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kawnhr (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of New Tory Party for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Tory Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Tory Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kawnhr (talk) 07:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Prosperity for Posterity Party for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prosperity for Posterity Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosperity for Posterity Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kawnhr (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nebojša Bakarec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Frances Russell

edit

You created this stub nearly fourteen years ago, and it hasn't advanced beyond that state. Can you improve this article? BD2412 T 03:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

edit

National Assembly

edit

Why does List of current members of the National Assembly of Serbia redirect to the 2016–20 parliament composition? Is there a page for the 2020 one? --Vacant0 (talk) 10:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2003 Brigham municipal election

edit
 

The article 2003 Brigham municipal election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Elections of very small towns are not automatically notable and we are not a directory of every election result, especially with literally nothing even contested! Lacks significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2016 Serbian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bač.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Patrick Johnston (social activist)

edit
 

The article Patrick Johnston (social activist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any apparent third-party, reliable coverage of Johnston -- main claim to fame is operating a short-lived advocacy org which was itself never covered in RS, in addition to contributing a minor opinion piece for Gale's Opposing Viewpoints series. The bulk of the claims in the article about VOXRX, his background, PA, Demond Tutu and the Nobel Peace Prize winners etc are unsourceable and possibly hoaxes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —0xf8e8 💿 (talk) 06:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Should anyone be interested, I didn't have anything to do with actually writing this article. CJCurrie (talk) 06:53, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2008 Serbian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turija.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Probyn

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stephen Probyn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mottezen (talk) 13:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2003 Bedford municipal election for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2003 Bedford municipal election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003 Bedford municipal election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ron Fontaine

edit

Please add a citation and grounds of notability for Ron Fontaine. – Fayenatic London 14:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2013 Serbian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zoran Živković.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1973/Position/Commissioner, District Eight has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1977/Position/Commissioner, District Eight has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1980/Position/Commissioner, District Eight has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Communist Party of Canada (Ontario) candidates in the 2003 Ontario provincial election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of a minor Ontario political party's candidates in a 2003 election. Page is uncited. WP:BEFORE search did not yield coverage or additional sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Z1720 (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Quebec school trustee election templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Quebec school trustee election templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Greg Gogan for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greg Gogan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Gogan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2016 Serbian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian Civic Alliance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

edit

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Barnstar of Diplomacy
In response to the recent RM at Israel and the apartheid analogy, I looked into the archives and found there was a great dispute over the naming. Yet you resolved that dispute by suggesting a name that was palatable to both sides. Bringing together both sides of the I-P conflict on wikipedia is not common and for that this barnstar is the least you deserve. VR talk 04:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canadian federal election, 1993/St. Paul's

edit

 Template:Canadian federal election, 1993/St. Paul's has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Serbian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Movement of Free Citizens.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario candidates in the 1975 Ontario provincial election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is unnecessary. The one name listed has his own article. Beside that, the full list of candidates is located at 1975 Ontario general election, which also indicates the results in each riding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 16:42, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merchandise giveaway nomination

edit
 
A token of thanks

Hi CJCurrie! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk ~~~~~
 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol

edit

CJ, I came from reviewing this article & i believe you proficient enough to give yourself the perm, can you consider this? It would help lessen the burden of reviewers, so please once again can you consider this option? Ah! Lest I forget, a happy new year to you. Celestina007 (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2004 Serbian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Serbia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

How we will see unregistered users

edit

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Members of the Assembly of the City of Belgrade

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Members of the Assembly of the City of Belgrade indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ex-Soldiers and Ex-Sailors Party of Manitoba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Ran just one candidate who failed to win office.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 08:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canadian federal election, 1988/Calgary West

edit

 Template:Canadian federal election, 1988/Calgary West has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hamilton, Ontario municipal election, 1985/Position/Council, Ward Four (two members)

edit

 Template:Hamilton, Ontario municipal election, 1985/Position/Council, Ward Four (two members) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hamilton, Ontario municipal election, 2003/Position/Mayor

edit

 Template:Hamilton, Ontario municipal election, 2003/Position/Mayor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hamilton municipal election, 2000/Position/Councillor, Ward One

edit

 Template:Hamilton municipal election, 2000/Position/Councillor, Ward One has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

New administrator activity requirement

edit

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Eighteenth anniversary on Wikipedia!

edit

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2009 Serbian local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2005 Mont-Saint-Michel municipal election

edit
 

The article 2005 Mont-Saint-Michel municipal election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No demonstration or evidence of notability. This is about an uncontested election in a town with a population just above 600. The election does not warrant its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 18:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2014

edit

 Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2014 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1973

edit

 Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1973 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1977

edit

 Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1977 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1980

edit

 Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1980 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1983

edit

 Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1983 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 1998

edit

 Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 1998 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2003

edit

 Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2003 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2007

edit

 Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2007 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, CJCurrie!

edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 18:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation (Serbia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet of Ana Brnabić.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sound Money Economics System for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sound Money Economics System is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Money Economics System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Union Labour for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Union Labour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union Labour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Communist Party of Canada (Marxist–Leninist) (Manitoba) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Protected edit request on 21 May 2023

edit

Hello, I am correcting a tracked syntax error on Wikipedia called the Tidy Font bug, and this userpage has one occurrence of this error.

When links are written in the <font>[[link]]</font> format with the color specified outside of the link, browsers don't agree on how to display the colors. Some browsers display it with the specified colors, and others default back to the standard link blue.

If you would, please change

<span style="border: 1px solid green;"><font style="background: green" face="Arial" color="#FFFFFF">[[User talk:Ardenn|Ardenn]]</font></span>

to

[[User talk:Ardenn|<span style="border: 1px solid green; background: green; font-family:Arial; color:#FFFFFF">Ardenn</span>]]

Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 19:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done Izno (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:1971 Quebec provincial by-elections/Chambly

edit

 Template:1971 Quebec provincial by-elections/Chambly has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mark Mullins (economist)

edit
 

The article Mark Mullins (economist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, doesn’t meet wp:NECONOMIST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 9 § Political groups in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 00:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:MunElec4

edit

 Template:MunElec4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:MunElec

edit

 Template:MunElec has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Serbia Against Violence (coalition)
added a link pointing to Civic Democratic Party
Vojvodina's Party
added a link pointing to Civic Democratic Party

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Zlatko Radić for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zlatko Radić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zlatko Radić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joy (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

edit

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

edit
 

Dear CJCurrie,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Progressive Party of Manitoba (1981–1995) candidates in the 1990 Manitoba provincial election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A list of two people who fail WP:NPOL and WP:Notability (people) in general.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Proposed deletion of John Shadbolt

edit
 

The article John Shadbolt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourcrd, not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

edit

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Natural Law Party of Ontario candidates in the 1995 Ontario provincial election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of uniformly non-notable people running for a non-notable electorally unsuccessful and short lived party. No indication that this would meet WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 12:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Natural Law Party of Ontario candidates in the 1999 Ontario provincial election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of uniformly non-notable people running for a non-notable electorally unsuccessful and short lived party. No indication that this would meet WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 12:33, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
Community 4
HOME 1
innovation 1
languages 3
mac 1
Note 1
OOP 2
os 129
text 1
Users 19