Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Cookie90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Whouk (talk) 13:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

National Film Awards

edit

Can I suggest that rather than creating lots of different articles - National Film Award for Best Music Direction, National Film Award for Best Costume Design, etc. - with no context and no information, you create and add the information to each in turn? As these stand, an admin is likely to delete all of the articles before any data is added as they contain no useful information and no context. Thanks. --Whouk (talk) 13:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

National Film Awards

edit

Ok. I was initially going to do that, but I thought people would come and want to add stuff, so I put the tables up first. :) I'll start adding information to the articles I've already created, and do them one by one from now on. Thankyou for your suggestions. :) Cookie90 14:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Great, thanks. --Whouk (talk) 14:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
They are looking good so far! Keep it up... --Deville 02:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you :) Cookie90 19:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

utcursch | talk 03:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries

edit

Hi, when making edits it would be helpful if you could explain them in your edit summaries... just so other users can know what you're doing and not have to look at every change. Thanks. gren グレン 12:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Mouna Raagam

edit

You removed the superfluous section on 'Cast'. It didn't cross my mind to do so. Good thinking. Dingodangodongo 03:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: No worries, buddy ;) Dingodangodongo 03:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nayagan

edit

Hi, I noticed that you had removed the image from this page, with the intention of adding a new image, you are most welcomed to do that. Please remove the current image after adding your "better pic" Mystic 15:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 00:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just to say Hi

edit

Hi Cookie,

By the way whats your name ? you can do something on your userpage just giving an intro about you.

Okay, Thanks for cleaning up Thavamai.... But i think i didn't mess up anything with your cleaned up version. I know you did right thing there but i wanted the Title to be right one thats why i moved the article back and ofcourse with your changes.

You are doing a great Job, thanks for correcting me in Chemman challai. If you need any help catch me at my talk page. Also feel free to correct me whenever i make a mistake (if possible with a mesg at my talk page, just as you did now) After all we are human and prone to make mistakes.

--M.arunprasad 06:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Convincing New Contributors

edit

You can see (at my talk page) what User:Prin had to say about contribution which i suggested. Lets try with few more who are making good contributions. Anyway let us continue our work, At one point of time they will join us. --M.arunprasad 05:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the old Classics, i wish you can add Veera Pandiya Kattabomman, which got an award for Sivaji at an International film festival. Let us rock the wiki with classics of tamil cinema for a while, and let the newbies take care of latest movies. what do you say ? do you have any other plans ? --M.arunprasad 06:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

'Tamil Films Elite 4'

edit

Type 'Tamil Films Elite 4' in Wikipedia and then reply on the page discussion board.

Contribute

edit

List of popular Kollywood films - I have started it, can u help finish it

Thanks Prin

Please help

edit

I'm a newbie on wikipedia. I would like to contribute to the project of Kollywood . Can u give me some orders please. Thanking You, Ramesh Madhavan

Enigma here

edit

hello....the special jury awards and the special mention in Natioanl Film Awards is the same. you can refer to pg. 902 of Manorama Yearbook 2006...

URGENT

edit

i can take my time n complete most of the national awards tables and remove mistakes too.....the only tables which i wont be able to update are the best film in regional languages

the special jury award/special mention which is the same award is not exclusive for feature films.....in fact i couldnt find even a single FILM that was given this award....all the awardees are actors, directors or technicians....refer to the table.....i'll complete it in a few minutes

REFER TO THIS TOO

edit

ok jus read the pdf file for the national awards...the thing is that i referred to the mnorama yearbook where all the special awards r given under one section....out of my effectiveness, i have listed them all in the special jury award category. for eg., J philip got the special jury award while gurdas maan n pradeep nair were given special mention. what i can suggest now is that v rename the article of special jury awards as Special Jury Award / Special Mention. what do u hav as a solution??

if v go according to my solution of renaming the article: 1. v wont hav to separate special jury n special mention 2. every year there r 2-3 special awardees. v can keep all of them together 3. and it cannot be called inaccuracy because v're mentioning the article as 'Special Jury Award / Special Mention'

Unabale to proceed

edit

actually i hav joined wikipedia only two days ago n i'm not sure how to rename the article. i think it happens via MOVE, but it says my account is too new to do so.

JUST another thing

edit

are you sure that devi by satyajit ray recieved the golden lotus award and tied with bhagini nivedita in 1962? ihave referred almost all other websites, books and forums too. in 1962 only bhagini nivedita was awarded. plz see to it

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Alaipayutheypic1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Plagiarism help

edit

Need help with regard to the Wiki entitled "Kannadasan". Most of its contents appear to have been practically cut and pasted from a website the Wiki refers to. I'm not sure what the procedures are in dealing with such Wikis so I thought I'd let someone more experienced know. Cheers. Splashprince 11:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ilaiyaraaja

edit

Hey, since you've been working on this page, I need your help. How does one: (i) Change the title of the Wikipedia article (the one in large letterings right at the top) (ii) Create links to this webpage if someone uses an different spelling for the title of a Wikipage (say, if someone keys in Ilayaraja or Ilaiyaraja or Ilaiyaraaja or Ilayaraaja, they still can reach this page)?

Cheers.Splashprince 05:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your feedback. I'm allowing ample time for interested readers/editors to contemplate on the Ilaiyaraja name issue that has been brought up on the discussion page (it's rather annoying when several variants of his name crop up all over the article), but yes, no hurry there, we'll take our time on it. Appreciate you writing at length about the procedure to do that whatever thingumajik that you explained on my discussion page. Splashprince 12:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Photo/picture: Cookie, there was a photograph of Ilaiyaraja behind this keyboard with infinite keys and set against a somewhat galactic background. I was at the Ilaiyaraja page a while ago and it has mysteriously vanished, with no trace of removal recorded in the page history. Would you know what might have happened? Splashprince 13:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


Cookie Wookie: You're about the only expert Wikipedian I know. Could you do me a favour sometime, perhaps when you've got extra minutes on your hand? Could you please go through the Ilaiyaraaja page for me? I did massive work on it, and hope you could provide some feedback or give some comments on it (if you have any, in the Discussion page). I would appreciate this muchos. And, if you can, probably alert a few other pro Wikipedians interested in Indian films/music to take a look too. Cheers. Splashprince 16:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Heya... thanks for looking at the page for me :) Splashprince 11:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hi Cookie. Just read your comments on my page about tabulating stuff. Nifty idea. I'm pretty much a newbie with Wikipedizing, and I just did what I could in my free time to improve the article. Managed to put through two requests for peer review! *phew* Not bad eh? I thought that this page was an interesting challenge to take up, given that reliable sources of information about the subject are far and few in between, and that squeezing out as much as I could from what I could get hold was a bit of fun. But I won't be Wikipedizing anymore so will leave this article in the good hands of other Wikiprofessionals (like yourself ;) So good luck with it! Splashprince 11:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

For some guidance on how to improve article, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ilaiyaraaja#SUGGESTIONS_FOR_IMPROVEMENT_FROM_VARIOUS_PEER_REVIEW_COMMENTS_.28SEE_LINKS_AND_BOXES_ABOVE.29 RaraTheAppleJuggler 03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bombay013.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bombay013.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Kamal Haasan

edit

Please vote for the Kamal Haasan article to become an article to be improved to be featured here, Wikipedia:Article Creation and Improvement Drive#Kamal Haasan Thamizhan 14:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

A R Rahman

edit

The line The music industry in India in general was going through a crisis with the retirement of older music composers and the lack of innovation in Indian film music is Totally WRONG and baseless. That is why I removed it. It is common to refer to the person by nickname or other names. See Gavaskar where the name Sunny is in the lead paragraph. See Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel where the Iron man is in the lead paragraph Doctor Bruno  02:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

edit

Award

edit
 | South Indian Cinema and Music Award
I'm happy to announce that you are bestowed this really heavy iron-cast Award, and I hope you have the biceps to hold it up because it recognises your awesome contribution, such as your countless, well-thought out edits, in improving South Indian cinema-related articles on Wikipedia. Congratulations. -- AppleJuggler 02:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Mia2.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Mia2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 07:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're invited to join WikiProject Dravidian Civilizations

edit

Vanakkam!

I see that you have created and contributed to the Tamil people page and would like to take the opportunity to invite you to join our group. WikiProject Dravidian Civilizations does not actually fall under a single country but several in South Asia. It will also cover everything from various ethnicities, history, arts, and more. Your contribution is needed in promoting the vast diversities of faiths, ethnicities, and cutlures of the Dravidian Civilizations. If you are interested in joining this group please log on to Wikipedia:WikiProject Dravidian civilizations and post your name under the Members section. I look forward to hearing from you. Much regards. Wiki Raja 10:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The film Raja Paarvai (1981)

edit

Dear Cookie, I created an article for the Kamal Haasan starrer Raja Paarvai. I think its one gorgeous film (have you watched it?) and was wondering if you might be interested in brushing it up. Hope all is going well with you. Cheers, AppleJuggler 03:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey, Welcome back!

edit

Hello Cookie90, I see you are back after your month's break. The tamil cinema articles are at an all time high now! Articles such as Jeans and R. Madhavan lookm exciting and I have tried my best to make it as good as possible. Please contribute to them as well.

  • But espescially try to help out with Jeans which is loking super but has a few sections missing, it could become the 2nd Indian film article (after Satyajit Ray) and the first Indian movie to be featured! Go for it!

Happy editing.

Prince Godfather 18:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Autograph.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Autograph.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Indian National Awards -- Sources of reference

edit

Cookie: For all the Indian National Award winners for all the years and for all the categories listed here --> what are the sources? Is this the definitive source ---> Matthew, K.M. (2006), Manorama Yearbook 2006, Malayala Manorama, India, ISBN 81-890-0407-7? AppleJuggler 04:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool. So the source for all those entries listed on that page is Matthew (2006) and various uncited websites? AppleJuggler 08:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MrandMrsIyerDVD.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:MrandMrsIyerDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:VikramPithamagan3.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VikramPithamagan3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rojabig.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rojabig.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


NFA for Best Child Artist

edit

hey. was jus checking around NFAs to update those. Can u cite the source for Kamal Haasan winning the 1961 Best Child Artist? According to my source (Matthew, K.M. (2006), Manorama Yearbook 2006, Malayala Manorama, India, ISBN 81-890-0407-7), the first Best Child Artist award was given to Baby Rani in 1969. Kindly see to it.

Fair use disputed for Image:MIApoll1.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:MIApoll1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well Done

edit

...on your contributions to R. Madhavan, helping to get listed as a FA! Universal Hero 16:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chemman Chalai

edit

Hi,

I noticed your creation of Chemman Chaalai and the poster you uploaded. Was wondering since you probably have the original poster or pic that perhaps you could tell me where I can obtain a copy of the DVD? I've been searching all over, but had no luck at all. Thanks. Wiki Raja 01:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

M.I.A.

edit

So are you a big M.I.A. fan like me? I saw your edit of my writing and I agree it was already in the body. But I do want to emphasize that she is political. I may add more later. I love M.I.A.'s work. Exander2009


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Navarasa02.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Navarasa02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thalapathi1.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Thalapathi1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thalapathi2.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Thalapathi2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thiruda02.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Thiruda02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Agni DVD.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Agni DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bombay005.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bombay005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bombayposterfilm.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bombayposterfilm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Marupakkam.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Marupakkam.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anjali.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Anjali.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chemmanchaalaiposter.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Chemmanchaalaiposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iruvar1.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Iruvar1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bombayposterfilm.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bombayposterfilm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Kuruthipunal.jpg

edit

I have tagged Image:Kuruthipunal.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Malli.jpg

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Malli.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Malli2.gif

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Malli2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Piravi.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Piravi.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Aaythaezhuthutitle.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alaipayuthey003.jpg}

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Alaipayuthey003.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alaipayuthey004.jpg}

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Alaipayuthey004.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alaipayuthey005.jpg}

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Alaipayuthey005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Children of Mini-Japan

edit
 

I have nominated Children of Mini-Japan, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Mini-Japan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 22:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of M.I.A.'s third studio album

edit
 

I have nominated M.I.A.'s third studio album, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.I.A.'s third studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. KurtRaschke (talk) 02:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC) KurtRaschke (talk) 02:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Alaipayutheypic1.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Alaipayutheypic1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 13:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Alaipayuthey005.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Alaipayuthey005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Miabook1.gif

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Miabook1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 08:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Footer Movies Shaji N. Karun

edit

 Template:Footer Movies Shaji N. Karun has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM07:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Kannathil Muthamittal (soundtrack album - cover art).jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kannathil Muthamittal (soundtrack album - cover art).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Warriorscd1.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Warriorscd1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kali Arulpragasam

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kali Arulpragasam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of P. S. Keerthana for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. S. Keerthana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. S. Keerthana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DragoMynaa (talk) 22:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Roja Poster.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Roja Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Minmini

edit
 

The article Minmini has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kesh Kumari

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kesh Kumari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 22:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of G. Srinivasan (producer)

edit
 

The article G. Srinivasan (producer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article isn't notable enough to be on Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG with no significant coverage. From my search, I can see that there are no sources present on the internet verifying his work except for news articles covering his death. Per WP:FAILN: Maybe merge the contents under the family of G. Venkateswaran / Mani Ratnam

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Minmini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of reliable sources to support claims made in article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

  NODES
admin 9
chat 1
Idea 1
idea 1
innovation 1
INTERN 2
Note 16
Project 8
USERS 2
Verify 2