Correction With Evidence

unblock | reason=no idea why it has been blocked. I am a new user. Initially I made multiple edits so I was temporarily blocked. That was ok but now permanently blocked for absolutely no reason, I dont know why panic action. All content was properly put

I am unable to edit .

All content entered was with reference.

If it is being interpreted as not legit then there is some mis understanding

unblock | reason=no idea why it has been blocked. I am a new user. Initially I made multiple edits so I was temporarily blocked. That was ok but now permanently blocked for absolutely no reason, I dont know why panic action. All content was properly put

Welcome!

Hello, Correction With Evidence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kavi Kalash did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  regentspark (comment) 13:24, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Kavi Kalash, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 09:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Authentic information

Declaration

1) this content is not related to living person. 2) it is not defamatory 3) information is authentic based on proofs and evidences . references are added Correction With Evidence (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kavi Kalash; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--regentspark (comment) 01:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Maratha clan system; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--HinduKshatrana (talk) 09:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Correction_With_Evidence reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring at Maratha clan system

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Correction With Evidence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #27490 was submitted on Nov 06, 2019 10:44:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Correction With Evidence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Correction With Evidence". The reason given for Correction With Evidence's block is: "Edit warring: at Maratha clan system per a complaint at WP:AN3".

• Blocking administrator: ‪EdJohnston‬ (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You are blocked directly; if you are seeing an autoblock message it means that you are trying to evade your block. I've also blocked your sock account.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gujrat/Maharashtra/Tamil Nadu/Karnataka/Madhya Pradesh

Hello, Correction With Evidence

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Gujrat/Maharashtra/Tamil Nadu/Karnataka/Madhya Pradesh, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 12:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RajeShirke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on RajeShirke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 💵Money💵emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 12:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Not allowed to edit

Someone is discouraging me from edit Assure you that all content was put on web with relevance Correction With Evidence (talk) 13:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Unable to proceed with Edits or Contest any Challenge

unblock | reason=new user. I am unable to edit as edits or any contests are permanently blocked. I am a new user Correction With Evidence (talk) 14:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

How to report if user suspects abusive admin

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Correction With Evidence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What to do if I suspect some admin blocks the account purposefully

Decline reason:

Stop abusing the {{unblock template}}. Your block has already expired. Yunshui ^雲_水 15:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am unable to edit even when account is not blocked

I am still unable to edit, my account still blocked. How to proceed and where to go.

I am discouraged to use unblock feature as it will be treated as another type of abuse Correction With Evidence (talk) 16:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

When you try to edit, do you get an error message? If so, can you tell us what it is? EdJohnston (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)