Edward Myer

Edward Myer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Edward Myer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Draft:Bruse Wane ( Rapper), you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello thank you for reaching out. No I do not own the page I'm just a fan of the musician, and was passionate about the submission. Thank you for putting things back into prospective. EdwardMyer 18:00 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruse Wane (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruse Wane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bruse Wane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruse Wane (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruse Wane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bruse Wane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bruse Wane has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bruse Wane. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bruse Wane ( Rapper)

Hello, Edward Myer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruse Wane ( Rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bruse Wane

Hello, Edward Myer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruse Wane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bruse Wane

Hello, Edward Myer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bruse Wane".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bruse Wane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruse Wane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruse Wane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 09:06, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Edward Myer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Bruse Wane, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

I have no relationship with the subject. Please save your unfounded accusations, and don't make this a matter of harassment. You left a real snide comment towards me on LiZ's talk page. Edward Myer (talk) 08:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Really, did I now? What comment was that? Just FYI, the last time I posted anything on Liz's talk page was about six weeks ago, and it had nothing whatsoever to do with you. You might want to check your facts before starting with the insults.

As for "harassment", my advice would be to steer well clear of accusations like that, unless you have clear evidence to back them up.

Regarding the above COI query, it is perfectly founded of me to ask about this, and there is no need for you to get shirty about it. The image used in one of your many drafts appears to be taken at fairly close quarters with Wane posing for you. You uploaded that image as your own work. This (and your evident eagerness to get the article published) suggests you might have a connection of some sort. If you don't, great, but it's still an appropriate question to ask. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

DoubleGrazing is correct. It was somebody else who made a snide comment. Lash out at your peril. BusterD (talk) 08:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Stop stalking me. Edward Myer (talk) 22:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

I got those pictures by googling the subject. Take the time out to that and you will see many pictures of the subject. Edward Myer (talk) 21:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Then they're not your own work, are they? In other words, you've quite possibly taken someone else's intellectual property and released it from copyright and into the public domain. I shouldn't think the (ex-)owner of the copyright is best pleased. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

My peril... Edward Myer (talk) 22:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

All that is being added is Historical facts. Acknowledge by the entire Hip Hop Community as a whole, Including Dj Primere and the genres top news source HipHOPDX. Independent third party source were also in the passage. Why are you not focused on the part about ill bill. Edward Myer (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

All that is being added is Historical facts. Acknowledge by the entire Hip Hop community as a whole, Including Dj Primere and the genres top news source HipHOPDX. Independent third party cited source were also in the passage. Why are you not focused on the part about ill bill Edward Myer (talk) 22:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bruse Wane has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bruse Wane. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mantronix. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 15:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

What I added was factual historic events. I also added portions that were properly cited from independent third party sources not connected to the subject. All links removed. Edward Myer (talk) 22:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Draft:Bruse Wane, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 23:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make edits with misleading or inaccurate edit summaries, even if unintentional, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 23:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruse Wane (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruse Wane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

There is over 30 independent third party references and citations in the article for top Hip Hop media sites, and you pull out disco dogs and YouTube. Your option is not valid, and Bias. I guess your pals sent you since I been ruffling some feathers I was told lash out at my Peril by you buddy, is this my Peri. Here's is cold hard fact 99.9% of you guys are taking money under the table. I'm not one of them. Edward Myer (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

The next time you cast totally unfounded aspersions on an experienced reviewer in good standing, or pretty much anyone else for that matter, you better have solid evidence to back them up. You're already attracting too much of the wrong sort of attention, I suggest you don't add further personal attacks to your résumé. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Scam. Edward Myer (talk) 23:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Bruse Wane ineligible for speedy deletion under criterion G7

I have declined your request to delete Draft:Bruse Wane as you are not the only substantive contributor to the page, so it is ineligible for deletion under WP:CSD#G7. Further, since you copy-and-pasted the material to your own user sandbox, deleting the draft would create an attribution issue with your sandbox. —C.Fred (talk) 23:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

would like all Bruse Wane Drafts Deleted. Edward Myer (talk) 00:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

On what grounds? —C.Fred (talk) 01:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

So I can start a fresh article for the subject that is written without any copy or pasting. Edward Myer (talk) 00:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 09:22, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• Specifics: The "new" user Lenardholding's only contributions are PRODding of articles created by negative reviewers of your articles, plus some vandalism, caught by the edit filter, of an article also created by one of those reviewers. Bishonen | tålk 09:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC).

  I believe I should be unblocked. Edward Myer (talk) 00:11, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

I believe is should be unblocked. I have been found guilty without any concrete evidence that I did this. Edward Myer (talk) 08:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

About Draft:Bruse Wane

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Bruse Wane a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into User:Edward Myer/sandbox. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the _target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 14:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. Edward Myer (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I believe I should be unblocked from editing

I believe the action is a bit severe. I have multi people in my house hold. And Crazy teenagers.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edward Myer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Edward Myer (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Assuming that your unblock request is what you wrote below, and not "your reason here", this is basically the "my little brother did it" excuse. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:18, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I believe the action is a bit severe. I have multi people in my house hold. And Crazy teenagers. Edward Myer (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Not an admin here, but I would advise you to read this as advice on how to respond to claims of abusing multiple accounts and write an unblock request accordingly. Regardless of what you were blocked for, "Your reason here" is never sufficient. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks, TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 00:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

I should be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edward Myer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked. I have been found guilty without any concrete evidence that I did this. Meanwhile no one is intervening with the editor that have been stalking me since I have become active again on wikipedia. @Bishonen Edward Myer (talk) 08:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. UtherSRG (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've placed your statment in place of the words "your reason here" as intended. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

So is it your claim that the other account is operated by someone else in your household? 331dot (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Please, read the guide to appealing blocks before you make another unblock request. Even with this block, the admins have been generous and have given you only a short block for socking. If you don't have a good case to make, I recommend you wait it out. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 19:33, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year. Edward Myer (talk) 21:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

We are getting close to WP:NOTHERE. BusterD (talk) 23:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Indeed... UtherSRG (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

The pattern here has been to attack any critique or critic. The "I don't have total control of my own account" excuse is unlikely to impress many admins either. And there's consistent focus to one goal: get the Bruse Wane article published, no matter the unresolved problem. The user has few other interests or edits here. SPAs are one thing, but disruptive SPAs are quite another. BusterD (talk) 03:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your assessment is of no consequence. You hold me in intrigue, go do something else. Edward Myer (talk) 06:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your assessment is of no consequence. You hold me in intrigue, go do something else. Edward Myer (talk) 06:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Edward Myer, BusterD is an admin taking stock of what should be done with this account. What makes you think their assessment is of no consequence? And you should answer the question above from 331dot (also an admin). If you post another unblock request without telling us, clearly and explicitly, whether or not you yourself created the sock, you will be indefinitely blocked for playing games. Bishonen | tålk 09:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC).

Edward Myer, there's quite a difference between stalking somebody and merely noticing one editor is acting badly (as admins User:Bishonen, User:331dot), User:UtherSRG, User:NinjaRobotPirate, User:C.Fred, User:DoubleGrazing, and myself have done with you in the past week). That you have attracted so much attention from so many different admins is not to your credit. I suspect that someone is about to remove your talk page privileges for your failure to act like a normal editor and unwillingness to accept your own responsibilities here. Unfortunately, your bad behavior will also likely translate into never seeing Draft:Bruse Wane published again. This is entirely on you, Edward Myer. Your bad behavior. Not theirs. BusterD (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 days for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.