User talk:EggRoll97/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:EggRoll97. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, EggRoll97, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Greyjoy talk 09:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi EggRoll97! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 11:11, Friday, May 25, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Rollback granted
Hi EggRoll97. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account for 5 days. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
One can change his AFD vote before the AFD closes. DBigXray 19:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
An egg roll for you!
|
An egg roll for you! |
| I gave this to HONOR your username and encourage you to keep up your anti-vandalism work ;) ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
- @Abelmoschus Esculentus: Oh my gosh, that's the funniest thing I've ever seen on Wikipedia (besides admins deleting the Main Page)! EggRoll97 (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sign your posts please ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- I think I'm getting forgetful of the whole signature thing honestly, I've forgotten it a lot... EggRoll97 (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then get used to it. I don't wanna template you about this... ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Abelmoschus Esculentus: Sorry, sir. EggRoll97 (talk) 12:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Lol seems you took that too seriously. Just a friendly reminder about your (bad) habit ;-) ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Abelmoschus Esculentus: Sorry, sir. EggRoll97 (talk) 12:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then get used to it. I don't wanna template you about this... ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- I think I'm getting forgetful of the whole signature thing honestly, I've forgotten it a lot... EggRoll97 (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sign your posts please ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
By the way
Interested in Huggle? ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Abelmoschus Esculentus:Might be interested in it, after I finish my Rollback trial period. EggRoll97 (talk) 12:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi EggRoll97. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to WP:STiki!
|
Hello, EggRoll97, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.
- Thanks for the welcome! Tool was easy to use and understand (besides when you have 2 diff links combined). EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 00:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Heads up
WP:ARCHIVE ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Abelmoschus Esculentus: Whoops, I couldn't figure out how to use the bots to archive it. Hang on, I'm figuring it out gradually right now. EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 06:32, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Please
reopen Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Research and Promotion of Farmers.You need to read WP:AADD and about weighing arguments.∯WBGconverse 09:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly, I would like to point out that I did actually read the policies around weighing arguments thoroughly before closing as a non-admin. At the time of the closure, it absolutely seemed like policy and consensus sided with the article, and in the direction of not deleting. However, per non-admin closure rules, my discretion sides with re-opening the debate. Apologies for any inconvenience caused, EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 09:53, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you message
Hi, EggRoll97
Thank you very much for your kind message on my Wikipedia page. Sorry if my reply message to you is late, I've been busy at college, at home and even been out and about with County Care, which is a community project, in the UK, able to help out young adults with disabilities (e.g. autism, downs syndrome, aspergers, deaf or hard of hearing).
The reason why I'm autistic, it's because I was diagnosed with it, when I was a couple of years old, towards the end of the 90's. But autism can't be a bad thing. Sometimes, it can be a gift. For example, I have a very good American accent, as I've only been to America once with my family, since we went to Walt Disney World, in spring 2006, when I was 9 years old.
I have a strong liking to Disney stuff, along with other things like James Bond, Austin Powers, Harry Potter, Star Wars, Art Attack, Mr. Bean etc.
Once again, thanks for your kind message and soz if my reply message is late — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielMasonThomas79 (talk • contribs)
- @DanielMasonThomas79: Not a problem! I do hope you become a routine contributor to Wikipedia, and I thank you again for your contributions. EggRoll97 (talk | contribs) 04:59, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please
go through this essay and accordingly volunteer at this notice-board, per the updated header.Best,∯WBGconverse 10:31, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- And, kindly substitute the external link in your signature with a wiki-link.∯WBGconverse 10:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I didn't think it was a troll, I just believed it was someone extremely angry at the filter. As for the signature, fixed. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- We decide as to whether someone is a troll or plainly angry, roughly by examining the details of his edit.I am very willing to reply to an user who harvested a good edit, (that was rejected by the edit filter) and subsequently got him to curse at us, over the report-board.:-) ∯WBGconverse 05:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, EggRoll97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Merry Christmas!
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
|
Hello EggRoll97, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
Hello, there. Thank you for your help earlier. All the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- No problem! EggRoll97 (talk) 01:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
List of foreign Premier League players
Please look of what pending changes you are accepting in the article. Today you accepted one that was pure vandalism or someone trying to insert a fake footballer from a virtual game into Wikipedia. Cheers. Baros1 (talk) 11:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Baros1: My apologies, it appeared to be an accurate revision when I approved it. EggRoll97 (talk) 14:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Spinning jenny pending change
Please don't accept pending changes that involve unnecessary changes between American and British (or other) spellings. I had to undo a change that you approved. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English Meters (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Your RfEFH
Hello EggRoll97, your RfEFH has been closed unsuccessfully. You are still welcome to assist at WP:EFFP where you could build up experience in this area. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 14:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification. EggRoll97 (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi EggRoll! Long time no see. You may be interested in this script. If you have any feedback or suggestions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page. Cheers. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
Abelmoschus Esculentus' User Scripts
Dear all. Recently, our community lost a dedicated user, Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Among their projects were a number of user scripts that they left behind. I (DannyS712) have copied the scripts, and have taken over maintaining them. You currently import one or more of Abelmoschus Esculentus' scripts, and I thought that you might want to import a maintained version. Links to each script are provided below.
| Rollback / Vandalism |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editing | ||
| Tools | ||
If you have any questions, please reach out and talk to me. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Reversion of Otoya Yamaguchi pending change
"If I reverted your edits and you don't know why, or you don't understand, please do ask!" I had an edit reverted by you without an acknowledgement or reason. The information I changed on the Otoya Yamaguchi page was just to give a more accurate description. There seems to be a group of reviewer who are dead set on ensuring the Proud Boys are labeled as a hate group. There is much contradicting information about this and much of the information in the linked pages is misleading or not factual. There are several lawsuits currently in progress and defaulting to the descrpition used by the group itself is the most accurate while this is figured out. Classification by the SPLC does not provide proof in any way. Yetsnaz (talk) 01:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Yetsnaz: I reverted the change as I believe it is part of an on-going edit war over the content stated on that page. I have, however, requested page protection. If there IS proper sourcing to support one side of the argument, I would be happy to re-instate your change. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause to your editing of the article. EggRoll97 (talk) 04:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @EggRoll97 If there's any attempt to make a change on the page it would be rolled back by Vif12vf. He seems to have taken the Otoya Yamaguchi page as his pet project. His claim on his talk page "The group is described as adhering to right-wing extremist ideology!" is all the reasoning I've seen to keep the description of the Proud Boys as a "hate group." Using information available from their own web page should be sufficient to ensure the information is neutral and not political.Yetsnaz (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Yetsnaz: Please keep in mind that I am not an administrator, nor am I a part of dispute resolution. If you can find consensus with other editors to make the revision, or reliable sources, I believe the change would go through much easier. The own organization's website is not a reliable source, as it is self-published. Please read Wikipedia's policies on self-published sources. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- [1] There seems to be an unwritten consensus to ensure the information on the page is inaccurate. The talk page has no consensus on way or the other. Reverting the page to call the Proud Boys a "hate group" is objectively the wrong path to take. The article for group itself doesn't even go that far. There is a consensus on wikipedia enough to keep that page with neutral wording. Why wouldn't keeping other mentions of the group outside of the main page neutral as well?Yetsnaz (talk) 15:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Yetsnaz: Please keep in mind that I am not an administrator, nor am I a part of dispute resolution. If you can find consensus with other editors to make the revision, or reliable sources, I believe the change would go through much easier. The own organization's website is not a reliable source, as it is self-published. Please read Wikipedia's policies on self-published sources. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @EggRoll97 If there's any attempt to make a change on the page it would be rolled back by Vif12vf. He seems to have taken the Otoya Yamaguchi page as his pet project. His claim on his talk page "The group is described as adhering to right-wing extremist ideology!" is all the reasoning I've seen to keep the description of the Proud Boys as a "hate group." Using information available from their own web page should be sufficient to ensure the information is neutral and not political.Yetsnaz (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
jovic
it was only a joke Steam n Whistle (talk) 06:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Steam n Whistle: It may have been a joke for you, but it might not be a joke for someone else. As well as this, that's not something to joke about. Keep in mind, it was only a general reminder. EggRoll97 (talk) 06:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Closing move requests
Hi, EggRoll97, and thank you for your contributions! For the future, please remember to remove the {{Requested move}} template when you close a requested move. For details, see WP:RMCI#Closing the requested move. Thanks again! Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 16:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Whoops! Thanks for the reminder! EggRoll97 (talk) 23:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's a pleasure! and here's another gentle reminder... please place {{subst:Relisting}} one space after the nominator's signature, as I've done at Talk:VLDB conference#Requested move 19 March 2019. Both problems lead to malformed move requests. Thanks again! Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 02:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
I love Kittens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
Bernard Kerik
@69.119.126.255: You may have a point, but do you have any way to disprove the sources already provided in the article? EggRoll97 (talk) 23:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC) This is the exact wording from Mr. Kerik's plea agreement, dated November 5, 2009, concerning the loan: As to Count 13, in the fall of 2003 when being vetted for a position on an advisory council to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security I submitted an executive branch confidential disclosure report to the department on which I falsely stated that I had no liabilities over ten thousand dollars. At the time I submitted that statement, I had an outstanding debt to a friend in the amount of $250,000. (Documented in SDNY case 07 Cr. 1027 SCR) and that charge relates solely to failing to document the loan on a confidential financial disclosure, and has nothing to do with bribery, or some nefarious activity involving an Israeli businessman as constantly written on the page prior. In addition, Mr. Kerik did in fact pay interest on the loan. I would ask that the inaccurate information be removed permanently. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.126.255 (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
You Made It Weird with Pete Holmes
FYI that this edit you made on behalf of an IP contained copyrighted material. I've tagged the article as such. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 06:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Berkova
You have misread theconsensus. It is nowhere clear enough for a nac. Please reopen. Spartaz Humbug! 20:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- Done. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Reviewer's Barnstar | |
| This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing articles under pending changes protection. Thank you PATH SLOPU 07:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC) |
- Thanks! (Added to my barnstars page) EggRoll97 (talk) 12:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Your RfEFH
Hello EddRoll97, your recent Request for Edit Filter Helper access has been closed as unsuccessful. You are of course still welcome to assist in areas such as WP:EF/FP relating to public filters. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 18:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
G13
I don't think CSD noms for stuff in userspace, especially for long-term editors, is a good use of your time. I think AfC needs you reviewing drafts. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Chris troutman: I tried to get added to the CheckPage for AFC, but I was told that while I met the numerical requirements, my work was too centered on vandalism prevention, and that I should try to improve my "dismal CSD stats". If you think it's a good idea for me to go up again, I'd be fine with it, but I'm not sure if my stats right now are enough to get added to the list of reviewers. My previous request is here. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. Let me look into it. Maybe I can help you get this taken care of. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:37, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. Let me look into it. Maybe I can help you get this taken care of. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
The June 2019 Signpost is out!
- Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising
- In the media: The disinformation age
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters
- Technology report: Actors and Bots
- Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?
- Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia
- From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal
- Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes
The Signpost: 31 July 2019
- In the media: Politics starts getting rough
- Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban
- Arbitration report: A month of reintegration
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?
- News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way
- Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect
- Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract
- Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
- News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings
- In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff
- Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users
- Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes
- News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello EggRoll97,
- Backlog
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
- Coordinator
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
- This month's refresher course
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
- Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
- Paid editing
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
- Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
- Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
- Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
- Tools
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Edit Filter
Hi Eggroll,
For some reason my edit request has already been deleted (despite being only 5 days old), so I cannot ask on the project page Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives/Reports. In this diff [1] you write:
Done – The edit for this report has been implemented; however, no changes to the filter were made. Looks to be fine here
However, my edit was not implemented on the Campaign for the neologism "santorum". What did you mean by the above? Can you please implement the edit that was falsely flagged as improper? Thank you. 24.217.247.41 (talk) 01:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- @24.217.247.41: Of course, sorry about that. I thought I made the edit, but apparently not. Regardless, it's been implemented now. EggRoll97 (talk) 04:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello EggRoll97,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 806 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello EggRoll97,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello EggRoll97,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
About the content policing system
Hello, today I filed two reports considering edit filter. One of them seems to have been removed without answer and a response to the other one suggest that we are not on the same page regarding the contents of the edit. My intent was to add an image to the infobox and I am not sure how am I supposed to prove what it presents via reference and how adding an entry to the discussion page to the article that has had no human editors since it's inception in 2008 is supposed to help the fact that any file from Commons containing "chodu" cannot be added to English Wiki because it will fail the automatic tests. Dominik27.09 (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Dominik27.09: Done, added both images. EggRoll97 (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Add bitchute to Comparison of video hosting services
Dear EggRoll97
I haven't been active on wikipedia for a long time and I don't know how this goes. Bitchute is a major video hosting site (alexa rank ~2000), it seems to qualify for being added to the list, and I would like to add it to the comparison, but the obscenity filter trips because of the name of the site. I know there were other problems with my edit like the nowiki tag that I'm apparently not supposed to use, I just tried to mimic the other rows, which were using the nowiki tag too. My intent is not to vandalize, but to improve. Can you please clarify why you would think that I am a vandal and what I need to change?
Best Regards, --Wolfgang.brehm (talk) 21:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Wolfgang.brehm: I'd suggest getting consensus first here. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:17, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- EggRoll97 :@EggRoll97:@EggRoll97: Thanks, I went there and just noticed that there also exists a List of video hosting services where bitchute is listed and now I am a bit confused. I agree with the merge proposal, but so long they aren't merged, I'll suggest adding bitchute, also it has already been suggested by Ayo. Wolfgang.brehm (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Wolfgang.brehm: Done after viewing talk page consensus and checking your references. I've also updated the Alexa ranking from 2,311 to 2,318 after verifying on the Alexa ranking site. EggRoll97 (talk) 08:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello EggRoll97,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Deletion of Doomspire Brickbattle
I wanted to make that page so users on Roblox or just browsing Wikipedia can learn what the game Doomspire Brickbattle is, in case they don’t know what the game is. LunarLOL (talk) 01:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
EFH granted
Hello. I've granted you +EFH per your request at EFN. I see there's actually a template for this one at Template:Edit filter helper granted, so you're welcome to go ahead and read that. Any questions, just ask someone, which may include me. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! EggRoll97 (talk) 20:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Congratulations! 🎉 - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 14:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! EggRoll97 (talk) 20:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Congrats
As an EFH, you are now able to view private filters (details, code, logs) as well as their associated logs. Please take care not to abuse this right, and happy editing! 
— 64andtim (chat • see here) 16:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, will do. EggRoll97 (talk) 20:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Fantasy trope RM
As I explained in my comment near the end, I don't think it is accurate to characterize the situation as "clear consensus that the article should move away from the present title". The main point of contention was whether the title should be plural or singular, so supporters of Tropes in fantasy should not be assumed to prefer Fantasy trope over Fantasy tropes. Taking this into account, the !vote total for moving to Fantasy trope is 5 in support and 5 opposed, which is not a consensus unless the support side was significantly better argued. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: As for the consensus about moving away, only two people seemed to generally be opposed to a move in general. I've jotted down on a notepad a somewhat recount of the participant's desires for the direction of the article, and I'm reading 4 supporting the original title, 2 supporting the alternative (with 1 stating "prefer" for the alternative, suggesting they believe the article should be moved, but to the alternate), and 2 opposing the move altogether, with 1 of the full opposition explicitly stating they were open to the alternate, and not suggesting in any way they were open to the original. I still see a consensus in favor of moving and a fairly split consensus for direction of the article, with support side possibly being weighted ever-so-slightly more on policy basis. I would say the general consensus, from my reading of the RM at least, would still be that the consensus supported a move, just not a specific place. I encourage anyone with objections to the moved title though to open an RM to Tropes in fantasy specifically though, in accordance with WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships