Some falafel for you!

edit
  Enjoy.
Kaimakides (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Whoa, well, it's safe to say falafel was the last thing I expected to ever see on my talk page. Thank you for this serendipitous treat. :) EIN (talk) 15:14, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Longevity escape velocity (LEV) graph.png missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sharia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Queenelizabethbeforeandafter.png

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Queenelizabethbeforeandafter.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Queenelizabethbeforeandafter.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Queenelizabethbeforeandafter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ancient Hebrew writings
added links pointing to Canon, Genesis, Exodus and Divinely inspired

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Utility/Legitimacy of “People of Levantine-Greek Orthodox Christian Descent” Category

edit

Dear EIN, You seem to have a good grasp of history, ethnology and cultural anthropology, notably re: dhimmi minorities in Asia and the MENA area Some Wikipedians have reopened an old CfD debate, purportedly aiming at removing the “People of Levantine-Greek Orthodox Christian descent” category– see discussion below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_December_16#Category:People_of_Levantine-Greek_Orthodox_Christian_descent Can you please help us with your learned arguments & let us know if you’re in favor of keeping it? I, personally, think it shouldn’t be removed. My perspective is Positivist & thus mostly ethno-cultural, not “theological”. Thanks in advance for your scholarly help, BA B.Andersohn (talk) 16:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Neo-Shu'ubiyya nationalisms

edit

Category:Neo-Shu'ubiyya nationalisms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Al-Andalusi (talk) 16:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Behavioural genetics societies

edit

How many entries will this cat ever have? Far as I know, there are just three societies that fit into this (if you include psychiatric genetics in behavior genetics). In any case, if you categorize an article in cat A, which is a subcat of cat B, then that article should not also be categorized separately into cat B. For example, the article on the BGA is now included in the cat "Behavioural genetics societies", which is a subcat of (among others) the cat "Genetics organizations". This means that the BGA article should not be separately categorized into "Genetics organizations" any more. I'd appreciate if you could do the appropriate cleanup necessary because of the creation of this new category. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

What happens after you die listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What happens after you die. Since you had some involvement with the What happens after you die redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 04:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Psychological effects has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Psychological effects, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of same-sex married couples
added links pointing to David Miller, Sean Hayes, Simon Hall, Richard Buckley and Jerry Dixon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Everything Is Numbers. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ND

edit

Licensed images are not generally allowed. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Anti-aging substances has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Anti-aging substances, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 00:47, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Everything Is Numbers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent sex and gender category stuff

edit

Hi, Everything Is Numbers. I noticed that with this type of thing, you were also adding the categories as an IP. Any reason you weren't signed in for all of your additions?

And as for moving categories, err on the side of caution, just like one is supposed to when moving an article...unless it's unlikely to be contested. This is per what WP:Requested moves states, although WP:Requested moves doesn't concern categories. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Beauty work

edit

Hello, Everything Is Numbers,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Beauty work should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beauty work .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

When adding categories

edit

When adding categories, are you keeping what WP:Categories states in mind? For example, WP:DUPCAT? It doesn't seem that you are. See the discussions here, for example. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. EIN (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:American alleged rape victims has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:American alleged rape victims, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete reference for a quote of Popper that is difficult to find.

edit

A few years ago, you wrote in Falsifiability (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falsifiability&diff=prev&oldid=515187922),

   Karl Popper concluded that "most mathematical theories are, like those of physics and biology, hypothetico-deductive: pure mathematics therefore turns out to be much closer to the natural sciences whose hypotheses are conjectures, than it seemed even recently."[1] Other thinkers, notably Imre Lakatos, have applied a version of falsificationism to mathematics itself.
I searched but could not find anything that Popper said that was even close to that.  Do you have the complete reference? 

Dominic Mayers (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domestic technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Everything Is Numbers. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Jewish Atheists Collage.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Jewish Atheists Collage.png, which you've attributed to File:Ayn Rand1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. wumbolo ^^^ 11:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Ann Pouder and cellular senescence.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit
 

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Le Deluge (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Mae West in 1953 left.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Mae West in 1953 left.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Writing systems derived from the Phoenician has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Writing systems derived from the Phoenician has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Nationalism in the Arab world has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Nationalism in the Arab world has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Popper 1995, p. 56
  NODES
COMMUNITY 5
Note 4
Project 4
USERS 8