File:Geoffrey Kleinman.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Geoffrey Kleinman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Geoffrey Kleinman

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Geoffrey Kleinman, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Gkleinman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Geoffrey Kleinman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 05:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The page has way too much personal information the edits were done by an ai editor who kept it to just the facts. Please restore the revised version, the original one is compliant and it is time to fix that after 15 years. Geoff (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
  NODES
Note 1