Gladfelteri
Welcome!
Hello, Gladfelteri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 23:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Infobox
editI thought this infobox migh improve the article Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church. Please edit and use it as you think best. (Terot (talk) 14:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC))
| Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Lutheran |
| Orientation | Evangelical Catholic |
| Polity | Episcopal |
| Origin | 1997 |
Request for comment/vote on deletion for Antiochian Catholic Church in America article
editBishop Gladfelter:
Antiochian Catholic Church in America has been nominated for deletion. If this article is deleted, all articles concerning similar Churches, such as your own, are potential _targets as well. If you would, please vote to keep this article at the page found on the following link. Thanks. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Antiochian_Catholic_Church_in_America --Midnite Critic (talk) 03:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Personal Ordinariate
editApart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should consider verifying whether groups such as the Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Sir, can you confirm what is written at [1]? (Look for comment at 22:31) --Wllacer (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Yes. what is written at [2]? (comment at 22:31) is accurate. See my comments under "discussion" section of the Wilipedia article about the Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church I posted 19 November 2009 for details. --Gladfelteri (talk) 12:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC))
Your recent edits
editHello Mr. Gladfelteri (I hope it's okay if I call you that). I just wanted to drop by and make a few suggestions regarding your recent edits to Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church. Firstly, regarding Raymond Copp, you marked a number of the edits you made to this section as minor when they were not what we generally consider to be minor. For example, you removed a reference and the {{anchor}} template with edit summaries saying that you were only making formatting changes. Typically only edits like correcting typos should be marked as minor. As an aside (in case your were wondering), the {{anchor}} template doesn't actually change the way the page looks to a reader, but it takes them directly to that part of the page when they're looking for the section on Raymond Copp.
You also added a line regarding the churches with which the Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church is in full communion. This is, of course, important information. However, even though you would obviously know about these things, information based on personal knowledge still needs to be referenced. Do you know of any reliable sources that support the information you've added? -- Lear's Fool 01:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Good Morning, Lear's Fool. Here is a reference to a website listing the Churches with which the Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church is in full communion: http://anglolutherancatholic.org/administration-and-diocesan-offices/churches-in-communion .
Here is a reference to the fact that Raymond Copp was never, as claimed in the information about him which I removed, a member of the New York City Police Department (NYPD.) Instead, he served 20 years with the New York State Police, and after his retirement from the NY State Police, served as Chief of Police, Brandywine Regional Police, PA.: http://gp4u.us/Our_Counselors.html
Thanks for your helpful information. gladfelteri gladfelteri 10:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome Home
editMy warmest congratulations for the wonderful news that you and your flock are joining the Ordinariate. I pray for a smooth bridge crossing. Wllacer (talk) 11:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, Wllacer! Blessings and peace. [User:gdfelteri|gladfelteri]] (talk) 9:201, 22 February 2011 (CST)
The article Raymond Walter Copp has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GILO A&E⇑ 16:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
No offense taken. I have provided several references to reliable outside sources to support / verify the information in the article. I simply ran out of time to add the references at the time I wrote that article before having to sign out for an appointment. I added the references as soon as the appointment was over. gladfelteri gladfelteri 14:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
edit |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
ALCC page:
editI was reading the Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church page, which I see that you have heavily edited. I was wondering if you would correct the external links at the bottom of the page. I was looking for more information, but I kept finding dead links. For example, it was unclear to me whether the ALCC has joined the ordinariate and no longer exists as a church body apart from the Roman Church, and the links were an absolute mess and no help. I did not want to simply delete them- I'd rather be able to find the info! Thanks Wcbpolish (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Jens Bargmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Robert W. Edmondson for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert W. Edmondson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert W. Edmondson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bistropha (talk) 22:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Raymond Walter Copp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet notability criteria. Retired clergyman from a short-lived denomination. Sources cited are all professionally connected with the subject.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bistropha (talk) 05:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Raymond Walter Copp for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Walter Copp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.