Haranoh

California WikiProjects

As a California Wikipedian, you may be interested in the California WikiProject (and/or one of its 'daughter' Wikiprojects on Southern California, Santa Barbara County, California State Highways and California County Routes). Please take a look at the WikiProject to see if there is anything that interests you. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to contact me. If enough people express an interest, it would also be very easy to create additional daughter WikiProjects, such as a Northern California WikiProject or a California Politics WikiProject.

It has also more than seven months since the 2nd Los Angeles area Wikipedia meetup ([ 26 September]] 2005), so it is time for another one. There have also been California meetups in San Diego (18 October 2005) and a very small one in Santa Barbara (8 April 2006. It's also about time that the Bay Area gets its first Meetup if anyone is willing to organize it. ^BlankVerse 05:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Operation COOKIE MONSTER

In support of Operation COOKIE MONSTER (OCM) I'm presenting WikiCookies in appreciation for military service to the United States. Happy Independence Day! Ndunruh (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Hydraxon

I changed the tag to db-vandalism because only incoherent text (eg "asjdawu3luasdh") qualifies as nonsense. LetsdrinkTea 00:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 03:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Reverting edits that are not vandalism

Hi. I noticed that you have rollbacked edits that were not obvious vandalism. For examples : [1], [2]. You reverted valid additions such as [3], [4], or [5]. Even though they need cleanup, formatting or sourcing, they should not be reverted. You also reverted an obvious grammar correction. You must be more careful when using Huggle. When reverting edits that are not obvious vandalism, you must leave an appropriate edit summary, to justify your revert. Huggle allows to enter edits summaries but sometimes you must investigate further before reverting, to check the validity of the edit (using google, etc). If this kind of reverts continue, your rollback rights will be removed. Regards, Cenarium (talk) 16:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Promotion of organization?--Pedrortm (userID)

Greetings, This is the second time I create this page(IPEA), though this time I actually expanded on the previous webpage and put links to prove that the Institute is an actual entity with international renown. I am assuming that it has been marked for speedy deletion because as Jimmy Walles said "it doesn't have enough google prescence or promotes an organization". However, this is because the Institute was created in January 2009 -- this however, shouldn't undermine its already impressive achievements. I invite you to see a few of the interview links on its International Friends profiles and Legion of Liberty news coverage to verify this yourself. The page was created for informative purposes only (its a nonprofit), and I don't believe it should be classified as "publicity" or "lack of presence". If you still don't agree that this page is worthy of remaining in wikipedia, I would greatly appreciate a somewhat detailed explanation. Thanks, Pedro Rivera —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrortm (talk • contribs) 02:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Overmilking

The overmilk. I'm glad the page was tagged for deletion, but you have to admit it was kinda funny. (: --The Legendary Sky Attacker 07:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Jessica lynn

Hi, I noticed that you tagged this page for speedy deletion under criterion A7. While your tagging was not incorrect, I believe you should have used criterion G10 instead, as this is clearly a page created only to attack or disparage its subject. This also gives the creator a more stern warning than a simple notice saying their subject may not be notable. It is also likely to get faster administrator attention.

Keep in mind that attack pages should preferably also be blanked. Some tools, like Twinkle, does this automatically. Other than that, keep up the good work! decltype (talk) 06:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Jacy Varisha

Hi thanks for checking the new articles. NPOV violations do not need to be speedy deleted, unless it is an advertisement. An A7 deletion is if the article claims no importance for a person. The articles may not even need to be deleted at all if written in the right kind of tone. If you find this situation again please tag with {{Autobiography}}, and possibly {{NPOV}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain further...

You just added a {{cleanup}} tag to Guryak truck bridge.

Could you please return to the article's talk page and explain your concern? Geo Swan (talk) 02:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

I got your response. My reply. Geo Swan (talk) 03:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

mis-tag re: Megan M Duffy

you tagged an article i wrote for deletion. the person the article is about is referenced by name in other wikipedia articles, can be searched on google and is directly related to several other wikipedia articles. i think it may have been flagged by mistake - lilmdawg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilmdawg (talk • contribs) 06:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

reviewed your the guidelines and still maintain your tag is a mistag, as biography is notable and can be verified - [6] [7] and cult following at [8] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilmdawg (talk • contribs) 06:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Probably should have went to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion instead of speedy. Just going by her IMDb page she seems notable enough. -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 07:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Great job, too

I can't believe someone would tell us that being contributors is a waste of time. Just AIV him whenever someone like that crops up. I'd reply in ukranian, but it would be too hard to type in it, as I didn't set it up (by typing and getting lables on my keyboard) Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 19:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

NPWatcher

Hi, Haranoh. I have granted you NPWatcher per your request here. After looking over a few of your contributions, your talk page, and your block log, I feel you can be trusted with the tool. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

gs

what do you want from galatasaray?--195.174.13.192 (talk) 22:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

• Accidental revertion. Not vandalism. Messages left with user and on article talk pages. AeonicOmega talk 23:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Revert

A gentle suggestion You may want to be more careful as this edit was completely fine. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Why did you nominate my article for deletion?

Everything in it has a source so it can't be a Preloaded debate OR I would really appriricate it if you either removed the afd or explained why you put it there and explained whats wrong with the article. The Cro-Magnon (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Beckleysville Rd.

While this may not be notable, I don't think it qualifies as a speedy deletion. Bearian (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

• So what would you recommend? IMO, it doesn't provide any encylcopedic information besides its location. Thanks, AeonicOmega talk 18:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I would expand it and find sources. It appears to have notable (or at least wealthy) residents, see [9], and traverses Gunpowder State Park, see [10]. Bearian (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Never mind, it has been deleted. Bearian (talk) 18:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Removed speedy deletion tag: 병렬컴퓨팅

Hi AeonicOmega! Firstly, thanks for helping out in CSD areas. I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on 병렬컴퓨팅- because: the article appears to be in Korean, and I can not find the article at ko wiki. The page should perhaps be redirected to Parallel computing If you have any questions or other message, please contact me. Thanks Kingpin¹³ (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Mmm, I noticed that myself, naturally the article could be deleted under G7, but it's likely the only reason the author was blanking was due to the deletion nom, and the article could make a good redirect. I will ask the user whether they actually want it deleted. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

thank ya Mate!

why thank ya mate! =D for the help finding the Village Pump Shugo Talk 17:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielTrox (talk • contribs)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

• Opinion essay: White Barbarian
• Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
• Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
• News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

IRC Cloak

I am AeonicOmega on freenode and I request a cloak. Thanks, AeonicOmega talk 21:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion removal

Hi AeonicOmega. I removed your speedy tag from Chris Uscinski because the article contains a claim of significance ("Summer topped the charts"). Since that claim seems to be unsupported I've PRODed it instead. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

• New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
• Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
• News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Jewcrack

It was funny enough that I did a Google search to make sure it wasn't a slang term (no hits, though). With no hits on the search, I didn't see any productive reason to keep the article around, so it got a speedy delete. —C.Fred (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

prod: Irena Troupová

Hello AeonicOmega. I've removed the {{prod}} template from Troupová article, I think the reason for deletion is inappropriate, unrelated to the notability of the subject of the article. Autobiographies are strongly discouraged but not prohibited. I added several sources and external links, check the article again, please, and look also at notability criteria for musicians. For further explanation look also here. Take the article to AfD, if you disagree. Thank you, have a nice day. --Vejvančický (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Barbara Januszkiewicz

Hello AeonicOmega, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Barbara Januszkiewicz has been removed. It was removed by Secondststudio with the following edit summary '(rewrite)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Secondststudio before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 20:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Davson, the artist

Hello AeonicOmega. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Davson, the artist, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: National exhibition tours are a credible assertion of importance. PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. GedUK  19:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Trout

You have new messages

Hello, Haranoh. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template.    File:Ico specie.png

 Chzz  ►  21:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Haranoh! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

San Diego Wiknic

Saturday, July 9: San Diego Wiknic

You are invited to the San Diego Wiknic on Saturday, July 9, from 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm in Fanuel Street Park, a grassy park on the Mission Bay side of Pacific Beach. Join San Diego-area Wikimedians at the "picnic anyone can edit" as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the United States. Visit our event page for full details. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sign up today! We hope to see you there! --Worldbruce (talk · contribs) 16:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for San Diego-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Thursday, August 4 San Diego Wiki-Dinner

Join us for an informal San Diego Wiki-Dinner meeting with visiting Wikipedians Rosiestep and Fuzheado, to get to know each other, and to help prepare for WikiConference North America in October 2016! --Pharos (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Haranoh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Haranoh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Haranoh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)