IainP

Natter on here about me. If I don't like it, I'll bin it :-P

To Do / Currently Doing

Tidy up the Judas Priest page - move Personnel to a new page

'Wikitable' Fear Factory discography, Machine Head discography and Anthrax discography (some nice person's done the MH one for me!)

Fix formatting on Anthrax discography for IE6.

Make Iron Maiden tours article using link below

Build up Tom Savini from stub to article

Build up Lawnmower Deth from stub to article BIG TICK - DONE!

Add more to Little Angels

Kill all vandals!!!

---

Gothic / Doom metal band list thingy

Duely noted. If he does it again, ill drop him a line. Leyasu 18:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Ruud Gullit

According to this (and my memory) Gullit was not sacked as manager of NUFC, but resigned. Perhaps forced to resign would cover it? AndrewMcQ 11:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Punctuation

Just to clear up my revert, please read this. Hopefully that explains it better than my edit summary. Nufy8 21:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

I was wondering myself if I should've put the punctuation inside the quotes when dealing with song titles, but I guess you're right, it does make more sense to clarify that the punctuation is not part of the title. Nufy8 21:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Amen. Nufy8 21:37, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed reply

Well, I've thought about it, and I'm really not a good writer or anything, so I think it's best to wait for you or someone else to edit the Maiden page. I can still give ideas on what to put in the article and help out, though. For 1983/Piece of Mind, it should be included that the World Piece tour was the first tour Maiden ever headlined in the U.S. Also, if it doesn't mention that with the addition of Nicko McBrain into the band, it became Maiden's most successful and still remains their longest lasting line up, it should. Malmsteen Maiden 10:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Hehehehe. You can find info on all Maiden tours on maidenfans.com. I'll link you. http://www.maidenfans.com/imc/?link=tours&url=index&lang=eng

Take your time though, lol. ;-)Malmsteen Maiden 18:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!

Now that you've done the Megadeth discography and Anthrax discography articles, I've started noticing similar problems elsewhere that I'm honor-bound to help clean up. Sheesh! (in case you couldn't tell, that was sarcasm) -- nae'blis _(talk) 14:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Sammyo56

FYI: this troll's advertised pages Desk Metal and Morbid Abortion are now on AfD. Ray Dassen 21:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Alan Shearer

Beat you to the Shearer goalscoring record edit :p User:82.39.182.231 19:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Replied

Hi, I've replied to you on my talk page, feel free to remove this notice once you've seen it. --Qirex 10:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

I've replied to you on my talk page. Cheers Qirex 12:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

WP:AFL

Hi mate, was wondering if you were interested in taking a look at the footy WikiProject, WikiProject AFL. Drop us a line with your thoughts. Rogerthat ^Talk 11:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Haha, no worries mate. Good to see a Pom learning about Aussie Rules. Firstly I suggest you take a look at AFL Video where you can buy DVDs and watch AFL games for free, a top site it is. But really there's nothing like experiencing it live, with sports like rugby what you see on TV is very similar to what happens at the stadium, but Aussie Rules needs to be seen live to fully appreciate it - bigger ground, more movement by the players, more tactics etc.

Anyway mate cheers for the feedback, Rogerthat ^Talk 10:40, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Haha yeah it's a bit like that. We know the rules, it's just the umpires that don't! The game only lasts for 2 hours so there's less time for beer drinking and hooliganism (we save that for the cricket in summer). And because it's so exciting you have to focus on the game, no time to get drunk ay! Footy starts in two weeks by the way :) Rogerthat ^Talk 10:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Getting tickets on the day is absolutely fine for most matches, the Gabba in Brisbane seats about 35,000 and the game isn't as popular there as in Victoria. In Sydney you're looking at the SCG which is around 40,000, and again the game isn't as popular, although you still get crowds of 30,000+ there, considering the more popular sport, rugby, gets crowds of 15,000, thats pretty good. Matches are always played on weekends (Friday night, Saturday/Sunday arvo, Sat night)

The finals series starts in September and it will be pretty hard getting a ticket to one of those games (well, if you book as soon as they go on sale, there's nothing ridiculous like 10 month waiting lists like in America). Click here for the 2006 fixture.

There's no Newcastle team mate, you might have to go for the other New South Wales team, the Sydney Swans (who won their first premiership in 72 years in 2005). Cheers, Rogerthat ^Talk 22:11, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Taking the ....

Hi Iain, no, it wasn't me who added it. My first reaction when I saw it was similar to yours, but I thought it deserved a little extra background digging, & the very informative website which I linked to seems to back it up. Of course, you can't believe everything you read on a website... but, under the joviality, it has the ring of well-researched truth. All these folk etymologies need to be taken with a pinch of salt, but as long as we don't state "this IS the origin of the phrase" then I think it's OK to leave it in, until someone proves definitively otherwise. SiGarb | Talk 21:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Slipknot discography

Yeah you seem to be right. I've checked other discographies and noticed what you said. The best discography table I've found is the Iron Maiden discography btw where you can see a thumbnail picture for the albums too. It's a different format to the one it is has at the moment though, but in the article its only difference is having the thumbnail picture next to it, but the format is different to accomodate the little picture in the table. You could modify the Maiden template by including the info already provided in the current Slipknot discog table. This is what I did for the American Head Charge article, which is my current wiki preoccupation. What do you think? I'm considering doing the work myself in the distant future (if it remains the same), but wish to avoid an edit conflict. LuciferMorgan 19:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

PS. If you need any Slipknot information pre-1998 about Slipknot, www.mfkr1.com is a great site, totally dedicated only to Slipknot info from that time, especially about MFKR. and Crowz. etc. Maybe the link should be added to the main Slipknot page LuciferMorgan 19:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply... sometimes there's so many wiki policies it's hard to learn it all in one go so thanks for the one on the discogs. Yeah collaboration is definitely better, especially when time is limited, so it's cool another wiki user did the image bit. The one's for the albums they could have just quoted the code from their album page image (they probably did anyway). Take careLuciferMorgan 20:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, i am one the people supposedly accused of vandalizing your wikis (yes you accused more than one). I am angered by this as you obviously do not realize that the person who actually did it probably has a dynamic IP address. So you will probably never catch them and you must realize that because other people also have dynamic IP address (due to having dial-up internet and other causes) might run upon your accusations (as have I) by chance when they browse wikipedia. As of this moment i ran a WHOIS against myself i found that there is one other person possessing the same IP I have just in America. If someone vandalizes your wikis and they do not have a username, just delete the changes and please do no make a fuss. If you block that IP, you will end up blocking multiple people from correctly editing wikipedia who unluckily obtained the ip 4.23.226.177 that you sent messages to.

(copied on my poster's IP address's talk page)

Some points:

1 - I cannot block anyone as I'm not an administrator

2 - I am fully aware that I'm flagging vandalism by IP addresses and that these addresses can be shared. As it's recommended elsewhere, if you have problems editing because some lowlife moron who happens to share your IP has vandalised a load of articles and had the IP address blocked... register. Create a username. It's as simple as that. That way even if you log on via the same IP, as long as your edits are OK, you won't be blocked. Would you rather we let the vandals go unpunished so they could just go on wrecking our (and in this I include yourself) hard work?

Please - sign up. Create a username. It takes minutes and will stop all the problems.

IainP (talk) 12:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Ldshfsklahfdjkla

I nearly reverted your last edit [1] on AIV as vandalizm, maybe an editsummary would have shown your intention. Agathoclea 12:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Machine Head videography

I know you wanted a MH discography... check this out: Machine Head videography. DMighton 06:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Do you know if there is a video for Old? Someone added it to the videography... but I've never seen or heard of a video for it. DMighton 17:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Megadeth-RudeAwakening.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Megadeth-RudeAwakening.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Categories

Hello IainP, Before I get to the issue noted in the section heading, I want to express my appreciation for your work in creating the two articles, Japanese Association of Supporting Streetchildren and Blue Dragon Children's Foundation. Please do keep up your work in this area.

Now, as for Categories: I discovered these articles owing to the fact that you had placed them both in Category:Child activists -- a category which I check in on from time to time because I created it. I immediately noticed the new articles, and in light of their titles, I wondered if they were really about "child activists". In both cases it turned out that the answer was "no". You see, the term "child activists" refers to children who are notable as activists -- not as you may have thought, to activists on behalf of children. It's certainly possible, though, that we could create a category along those lines -- if there are enough articles about such people to warrant a category. In any event, both of these articles are already properly categorized as "children's charities", so readers will be able to find them there.

Needless to say, I deleted Category:Child activists from both articles -- and while I was at it I also deleted two other categories, because they were redundant as parent cats to more specific categories that you had already made use of. I know it's hard to resist the temptation to put one's articles in as many categories as possible, but if everybody did that it would defeat the whole purpose of having categories. So I hope you will exercise a bit of restraint on that score in your future work. Thanks again, and best regards, Cgingold (talk) 02:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Powerglove

I have nominated Powerglove, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerglove (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cazbahrocker (talk) 06:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello IainP! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Thomas Toughill - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Reference added IainP (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Jeff Hanneman

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Jeff Hanneman/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Japanese Association of Supporting Streetchildren

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Japanese Association of Supporting Streetchildren. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese Association of Supporting Streetchildren. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Japanese Association of Supporting Streetchildren

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Japanese Association of Supporting Streetchildren. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese Association of Supporting Streetchildren (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Blue Dragon

Hey - I've left you some comments about the Blue Dragon Children's Foundation article on its talk page, since you posted a request for assessment at WikiProject Vietnam. Hope those suggestions can help :) --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 18:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BDCF-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BDCF-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, IainP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, IainP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, IainP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)