Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, Ivanhardybirt, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am your mentor and you can ask me any questions on my talk page or check out our help pages if you need help. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome! 141Pr {contribs} 11:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi Ivanhardybirt! I noticed your contributions to Sam Denby and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 02:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lake Louise (Manitoba) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Lake Louise (Manitoba). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Suntoloo Panoom (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lake Louise (Manitoba) (March 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrowssapSMM was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DrowssapSMM 16:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ivanhardybirt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrowssapSMM 16:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Diana moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to The Diana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 14 novembre (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Diana (March 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus [petri dish¡growths] 20:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

North Marysburgh Township, Ontario moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to North Marysburgh Township, Ontario. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Killarnee (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.

Categories

edit

Hi there and welcome to Wikipedia. Please check before adding categories to articles that the article is not already a member of a subcategory of that category. For example, the article for Dove Holes was already in Category:Chapel-en-le-Frith, which is a subcategory of Category:High Peak, Derbyshire. By Wikipedia convention, and to avoid duplication, only the "lowest" appropriate category in the hierarchy is used, so adding Dove Holes to the High Peak category was incorrect (I've reverted it). See WP:CAT#TREE. Dave.Dunford (talk) 13:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Johnny in the Middle of the Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The page Johnny in the Middle of the Park was created specifically for explaining the lostwave. It is not notable enough to be on Wikipedia and it only as primary sources and not secondary reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Read Wikipedia:No original research for more information.

Category:Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

La Domenica Sportiva Edit

edit

I saw you made an edit to La Domenica Sportiva article. You did not state a source of where you got the information of that particular song being played in an episode of the TV program. This edit can be located here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Domenica_Sportiva&diff=prev&oldid=1232024579. Therefore, I have reverted it. If you have an actual credible and reliable source that states that this song was played in an episode of La Domenica Sportiva, then you can insert the sentence again. Until then, do not add it back. Soafy234 (talk) 23:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Johnny in the Middle of the Park for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny in the Middle of the Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny in the Middle of the Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Skyshiftertalk 10:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Michael Hofmann de Boer moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Michael Hofmann de Boer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Hofmann de Boer (July 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 16:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Hofmann de Boer (July 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Youknow? (talk) 17:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Hofmann de Boer (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zingarese were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Zingarese talk ¡ contribs (please  Â mention me on reply; thanks!) 14:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Lake Louise (Manitoba)

edit

  Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Louise (Manitoba), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Hofmann de Boer (August 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:North Marysburgh Township, Ontario

edit

  Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Marysburgh Township, Ontario, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Marysburgh Township, Ontario (August 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 04:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alastair King-Smith for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alastair King-Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alastair King-Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Anne Sherriff for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anne Sherriff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Sherriff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 13:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Diana

edit

  Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Diana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Diana (September 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lake Louise (Manitoba)

edit
 

Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lake Louise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mark Edward Le Sage for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Edward Le Sage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Edward Le Sage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KH-1 (talk) 05:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starla (October 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bobby Cohn (talk) 12:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Starla Whaley

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Starla Whaley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommissarDoggoTalk? 13:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starla (disambiguation) has been accepted

edit
 
Starla (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 13:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip Egerton (died 1698), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Egerton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
admin 2
chat 9
COMMUNITY 2
Idea 1
idea 1
INTERN 1
Note 1
Project 1
USERS 7