Hello. You violated Wikipedia policy on three counts. "No own". "I don't like". And also you gave NO EXPLANATION for your rude obnoxious arrogant disrespectful reverts. Of decent modifications and wording changes. They were good faith modifications that you removed for no apparent reason, except you personally didn't like it. Which is against Wikipedia policy and drift. Do it again, get reverted again. Stop breaking Wikipedia rules. Thank you. 2603:7000:A900:45DF:8D98:2B37:4B41:F518 (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Closing discussion on Taylor Lorenz

edit

I disagree with close. the discussion definitely was not WP:FORUMing, in that the talk section was actively talking about changes to the article. I am also not sure WP:HOUND should be invoked unless you can get an uninvolved admin to prove it. I can't tell from the WP:ANI section that any admin was agreeing.

Def am not on awshorts side in removing the harassment section, but closing the talk section early probably does not bring consensus. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you agree, would you be willing to undo your close and let the convo peter out naturally? Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree with you as well Blue regarding the close .
An alternative that may be agreeable is to hat the conversation with Delectopierre and I (I don't think I've replied yet) and allow the content portion of the discussion to continue.
Awshort (talk) 00:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Bluethricecreamman If you're referring to me invoking WP:HOUND, it was in reference to edits made on other articles, not on the Lorenz talk page or article. But I am unsure if that's the case. Delectopierre (talk) 06:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
  NODES
eth 3
Story 1