User talk:Matthewedwards/Archives/2008/09

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Re: User:Gary King/localize comments.js

I made this edit because I had this problem; I guess it fixed it for me but broke it for you. I'll have to look into it more to see why it's doing that – weird. Gary King (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow, that was a quick response! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do to fix it, but that code that I commented out was for minor cases – such as when today is the 31st of the month. I imagine other dates work, just not those from today? If so, then not a major problem but I will still try to fix it; the problem is that now everything is fine for me but broken for you. Gary King (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually, everything is working for me now. I just cleared my entire cache and now the day appears correctly. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Okay great so I guess the commenting out fixed it for both of us. The problem only affected the dates that were the 31st of a month, so the last time you would have noticed this was two months ago. Gary King (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

OK. Well as long as everything's fixed. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Now I know why I had that code that messed the dates up on the 31st. It's because when today is the 1st of the month and yesterday is the 31st, then something weird happens with the dates. I'm still working on it. Gary King (talk) 04:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay I finally fixed it with this hack. It isn't perfect but it should do. Gary King (talk) 04:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

OK. I cleared out my cache again and everything's working as it should be at this end. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Alaska FLC

Since the FLC was closed, I wanted to respond to this directly: "Footnote 13, "Governor Palin's term expires December 6, 2010; she is not yet term limited" -- does this need updating? I'm presuming she won't stay Governor now she is McCain's running mate"

Her term still expires on December 6, as will the term of any possible replacement for her should she resign. We can't crystal ball and say she will resign. --Golbez (talk) 02:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Of course. That completely slipped my mind. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review: Los Angeles Lakers seasons

Since I know you're a good reviewer, I'm going to ask you first if you may review the peer review for this article. The link is right here. Thanks. -- K. Annoyomous24 08:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Template talk:NBA Awards

I think you should respond to what Chrishomingtang is saying on this talk page. -- K. Annoyomous24 06:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

		The Guidance Barnstar
		Thank you for helping me setting up a committed identity! NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 14:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Yay! Thank you! :)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes

Thanks a lot for all the suggestions. I think I solved them, so if you have time could you take another look? Nergaal (talk) 06:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Just to double check: are you still not pleased with how the list looks now? Nergaal (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

bump Nergaal (talk) 02:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia: Featured list candidates/List of celebrities at WrestleMania

I responded to your comments, may you take another look?--S_RX 01:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I replied again, thanks. :)--S_RX 22:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

IRC

Sorry for not responding earlier; I've been offline since I sent that last message to you yesterday. Please let me know if and when you can be on IRC today, thanks! Gary King (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

On now. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 17:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

You got mail about FLC. Gary King (talk) 02:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

NP Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Once again, thanks for all your comments on my List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2000, which is now a Featured list.

Sincerely, Jaespinoza (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Note to self

Remember to ask User:MZMcBride about article creation logs tomorrow. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Chicago Bears seasons

Hello, I just got done reading your advice on the FLRC, Chicago Bears Seasons and would like to thank you for your review. Right now I am pretty much in charge, along with User:TonyTheTiger on getting this out of FLRC. I just would like to know what you think the most pressing issues left on this one is. I have started making corrections based on your advice but would love to know what you find the most important isuues to be, so I can get work into them first. -Marcusmax (talk) 22:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Anything regarding WP:ACCESS, which in this case is colours. I can't think of one good reason why we should make thing inaccessible to our readers with handicaps. That's my first concern. My second would be the reference/footnote formatting. If you have any problems with the formatting, let me know and I'll address it myself. I know how much of a ball-ache it can be. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 23:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Just a quick qusetion/comment. Thanks for all your help, we have someone from WP:CHICAGO who is going to fix the reference/footnote formatting. How do you recommend, we go about changing the color scheme? -Marcusmax (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

The Wikimedia colour schemes at WP:COLOUR are probably a good example to go by. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 18:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I manually changed the color schemes and tried to make them as nice as I could for the visually impared. What do you think? -Marcusmax (talk) 01:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

They look better, but to be sure they should be checked out using the websites given at WP:COLOUR Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Rudolf Wanderone peer review

A second peer review has been opened on Rudolf Wanderone; I hoped you might like to have a look at it, as one of the "daily life" peer reviewers. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 23:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

No. I wouldn't like to. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 23:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright request question

Hi, I sent a copyright release on some web material to permissions-en@wikimedia.org a week ago and I have not heard from them, I am new to wikipedia, so I am just wondering how long things usually take. Did I have to do anything else besides sending the release email? I am asking you because you deleted a page Knowledge Instinct which I accidentally re-created but which was originally deleted because of the copyright problem. Thank you. Romanilin (talk) 02:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Did you do what it says here? If so, just wait I guess. Sorry I can't be of any other help. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok I got a reply, so everything is OK, just took a couple of weeks. Thank you.Romanilin (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Responded

I have replied to your email. Gary King (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

FLC director

Hi Matthew, hope you're well. Can you remind me when you felt that you'd be able to take over from me as FL director? No rush! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Heh.. might be a bit of a problem with that. My access right now isn't as limited as I thought, however, my cable bill is due this week and for some reason it rocketed from $101.18 last month to $327.39. It's wrong, so I refuse to pay it and it'll end up being shut. Then I'll have to get DSL so it may be a couple weeks longer before I can take over. :( Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

No worries. Hope you sort your problems out soon! Take it easy, give me a shout when you're back up to speed. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Image:DCS promo front.jpg

Hi. You deleted File:DCS promo front.jpg earlier today, following its IFD nomination on 29 August. The nominator said it was a replacable image of a building, however, this is false. The image is o Degrassi Community School, a fictional school in Degrassi: The Next Generation. The producers, Epitome Pictures, do not use a real school; it is simply a facade on their backlot which is not open to the public. While working on getting a number of Degrassi articles to FA status, I asked the production company in July if they would be willing to supply any free-to-use images but unfortunately they told me that they couldn't at this time. I was hoping you would be willing to reconsider your deletion since there is no replaceable image, and it really isn't a building. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi Matthew. I'm happy to reconsider (in this case by relisting at images for deletion) but I think the result is foregone. What is usually meant by replaceable in this context is that the image could be replaced by a free equivelant (per WP:NFCC#1) that is not necessarily an image. The image was a shot of a 19(6/7)0s ish school front with "Degrassi Community School" written on it. It's often the view that a simple shot like this, which is not discussed in the article, can be replaced by either text (or nothing). Apart from this, the image is likely to be seen to fail WP:NFCC#8 in that it is decorative and does not add significantly to reader's understanding. While I'm happy to run it through IfD again, have you considered using the existing article from one of the FAs on the topic - Image:Smith Mewes Morrisette Degrassi.jpg ? This is one that could also attract sourced commentary. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

dates/Jimbo

Thanks heaps for your note, Matthew. Nice to know, but I'm satisfied with the situation there—the link to the positive comments up to mid-August kind of does the trick. I'd like to avoid making a post at the moment, which might inflame things. Tony (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Mastodon discog - FLC

Your comments are welcome to this list. Cannibaloki 18:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Ack, I was too late. It's been archived. Sorry Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Don't understand anything, but anyway, thanks for your attention. Cannibaloki 20:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

When I went to the review page, it was blank with only a link to the previous FLC. I assumed it had closed, and didn't realise it had been reopened. Obviously with the comments left today, it has been renominated. I will take another look in the morning. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Aaaaaahhhhhhh, okay - no problem guy! Cannibaloki 05:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Hunterian Society

Hello. I see you have deleted Hunterian Society, which I started, stating "(G12: Blatant copyright infringement: Copyright violation of http://www.hunteriansociety.org.uk/ (CSD G12))". I hope that is wrong, and I should like to see what passage (other than any cited quotations) you had in mind. In any event, most of the article was certainly not a copyright violation, and the subject is notable, so I should like to start the article again. Can the work I did on it be retrieved for me, please? Xn4 (talk) 02:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Template:NBA Awards

I was wondering where you put the problem on WT:MOS? -- K. Annoyomous24_[c] 06:41, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 103#Two styles of navigational templates, is one bad? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 23:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 6 (FINAL ISSUE)

—Rschen7754bot (talk) 03:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Hunterian Society

Hello, again. May I please have a reply to the message below, which has been moved by a bot to User talk:Matthewedwards/Archives/2008/09)? Xn4 (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I see you have deleted Hunterian Society, which I started, stating "(G12: Blatant copyright infringement: Copyright violation of http://www.hunteriansociety.org.uk/ (CSD G12))". I hope that is wrong, and I should like to see what passage (other than any cited quotations) you had in mind. In any event, most of the article was certainly not a copyright violation, and the subject is notable, so I should like to start the article again. Can the work I did on it be retrieved for me, please? Xn4 (talk) 02:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

deletions

how is Luna Mortis not significant? It's a band that's been touring for some time and has gained a record deal with a major record label. Seems pretty significant to me. 72.72.194.82 (talk) 01:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Luna Mortis at the time did not indicate importance or significance of a group, and was deleted per CSD I7. Anyway, it's been started again at Luna mortis. -- Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 16:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

List of The Bellflower Bunnies episodes

Hello. I'm doing my third peer review of this list in hopes of FLC. Will you please check it over and tell me what needs to be done? --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 12:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'll look in the next couple of days Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 16:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

FLRC

Hi Matthew

Thanks for latest work. I've been neglecting it.

When are you planning to drop this? I'd better make sure I (and Gonzo!) am back up to speed well before then. --Dweller (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. As soon as The Rambling Man pulls his name from FLC and puts me in his place, I'll remove myself from FLRC. Is Gonzofan ready to take it on? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 03:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm ready! ;) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Congrats

On that shiny gold star for Mother and Child Reunion (Degrassi: The Next Generation) :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I hadn't noticed it yet! :) Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 03:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

TFAR blurb

As requested. Just replace whichever current request has the lowest points, probably the first one.

Degrassi: The Next Generation (also known as D:TNG, DTNG, Degrassi:TNG, or simply Degrassi) is a Canadian teen drama television series from Linda Schuyler and Yan Moore that premiered on CTV in Canada on October 14, 2001. It is the fourth series set in the fictional Degrassi universe created by Schuyler and Kit Hood in 1980. Like its predecessors, Degrassi: The Next Generation follows a group of students attending Degrassi Community School who face instances of challenges common to teen life. D:TNG is produced by Epitome Pictures in association with CTVglobemedia and distributed by Alliance Atlantis. The series airs on CTV, a Canadian terrestrial television network, although episodes of seasons six and seven premiered on the United States cable channel The N before they were broadcast in Canada. The current executive producers are Epitome Pictures founders Schuyler and husband Stephen Stohn, and Brendon Yorke. The executive creative consultant is James Hurst. Jody Colero is the music supervisor and selects all the music for the show, while Jim McGrath composes the music score. Filming takes place at Epitome's studios in Toronto, Ontario. (more…)

–Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 17:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Featured content IRC channels

Matthew, can you please see the responses to your postings at WP:FAC (not sure if you have it watchlisted)? Several of us are very concerned about this and want to know a) where was this discussed and decided and b) what is supposed to happen on these IRC channels. Thanks. Karanacs (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm just the messenger. I didn't create either of the channels. Would you rather them be there with no notification? I suppose I could delete the edits where I did post notifications. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Considering pending changes at FLC, I'm very concerned about where you stand on this and how it came about. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you're unhappy with my appointment, FLC is the po'boy relation to FAC, and we're all secretly trying to destroy Wikipedia on IRC. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I did my part (more than enthusiastically, along with Tony) to try to help elevate FLC's quality, standards and prestige via the director elections and via the Dispatches, so please avoid the "poor sister" stuff. When one of the first things you do as director is something that will negatively impact FAC and all other featured content processes, I hope you'll consider the concerns expressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

The only thing I did is notify every Featured content project page about the existence of an IRC channel. I don't see what's negative about that. I would have thought it would have a more negative effect if I knew of its existence and didn't let people know, so that only the pople who accidentally happened upon it would be there. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 22:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry you don't see the problem, acknowledge the harm, or recognize that, as a director, IMO your role as a leader should have been to completely discourage the notion rather than endorsing and promoting it. Of course, that makes me concerned about your judgment wrt featured processes. Anyway, with discussion underway atWT:FAC, I'm going to unwatch here; this shouldn't be personal, rather about how to now deal with the bad effect this will cause. It will certainaly affect my workload and how I will process FACs, and in the future, you might just give a second's thought to consulting with other featured process directors before enacting or endorsing changes that will negatively impact all of us. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

"Following on from the creation of #wikipedia-en-FL ^connect for discussing the WP:Featured list process, a new IRC channel for discussing all Featured content has been created. #wikipedia-en-FC ^connect. Please see WP:IRC for more on using IRC with Wikipedia." does not endorse or promote. Yes, of course the discussion is being held at WT:FAC, instead of Portal talk:Featured content, because it only affects Featured Articles, not the entire Featured content. I'm sorry you seem to think I'm advocating something, and you're right, it shouldn't be personal, but it is. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 22:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Any harm that we could do would have already been done at the existing Wikipedia IRC channels. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

IRC Channs comment

Regarding this, don't worry, you weren't shot, you were just arrested, tried, convicted, and hung within fifteen minutes ;) Much better huh? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, seriously! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Yep, the FAC cabal can't kill you. Otherwise there would be nobody to blame! –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 22:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Jeez Matt, this is getting kind of comical. I can't believe some of the reactions.

But there's so much stuff we do need to talk about, you want go get on IRC and go talk... oh boy, I've said too much ;) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

IRC FAC channel

Shut it down. Now. Please. For the sake of Wikipedia. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 00:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

IT IS NOT UNDER MY CONTROL. I DID NOT CREATE IT. I DO NOT RUN IT. Jeez, why don't you people see that? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 00:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

• I apologize. Please forgive me. Quite honestly i mean that.
• Please direct me to the person I should be giving grief instead of you. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 00:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok, apology accepted, and I apologise for shouting. It's just that I seem to be the scapegoat for this.

Did you know that the following are listed at WP:IRC: #wikipedia ^connect, #wikipedia-en ^connect, #wikipedia-en-help ^connect, #wikipedia-en-friends ^connect, #wikipedia-en-admins ^connect, #wikipedia-mediation ^connect, #wikipedia-medcab ^connect, #wikipedia-BAG ^connect, #wikipedia-spotlight ^connect, #wikipedia-en ^connect, #wikiproject ^connect, #wikipedia-ark ^connect, #wikipedia-wikiproject-scripts ^connect, #wiki-hurricanes ^connect, #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect, #wikipedia-1.0 ^connect, #wikichem ^connect, #wikipedia-en-adopt ^connect, #wikipedia-en-unblock ^connect, #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect, #wikipedia-en-blpwatch ^connect, #countervandalism ^connect, #cvn-wp-en ^connect, #wikipedia-en-alerts ^connect, #wikipedia-en-spam ^connect, #wikipedia-spam-t ^connect, #wikipedia-SCV ^connect, #wikimedia-otrs ^connect, #wikimedia-social ^connect, #wikipedia-social ^connect, #wikipedia-en-casual ^connect, #wikimedia-tech ^connect, and #mediawiki ^connect. The fact that Wikipedia has a section for IRC seems to indicate that they're approved.

I don't think #wikipedia-en-FC ^connect wants to take over WT:FAC, just like #wikipedia-en ^connect hasn't taken over the Village Pump, and #wikipedia-en-help ^connect hasn't taken over the Help Desk. In fact, there's been nothing to say that the channel would be used to discuss Featured content candidates. It's only been operating a day, and when the furore dies down, and if it stays, the channel might be used to discuss already Featured content, and to give a real-time response to people with Featured content questions. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 00:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Well said Matthew. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 00:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

...for the sake of Wikipedia? As far as I can tell, it's been open for a couple hours, and Wikipedia still works. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I explain that comment here. And the problem is not whether it works; it's how it works. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 00:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

But as I said, there have been none of the accused issues, so removing it from Freenode would be giving a solution a problem. If it does create the slightly problems, then we will remove it. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

(undent) Serious thought should be given to shutting them all down, unless there is some reason why they perform some function that absolutely must be undertaken in real-time. They exist for social networking. They promote social networking. They are social networking. Wikipedia is not a social networking area; MySpace, Geocities and FaceBook are down the hall to the left. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 00:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Ling, many of those channels have existed for years. Have they harmed you? –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Replying would be uncomfortable. I have personally been involved in case(s) that I would rather let convalesce in the dark somewhere, so that people can have time to set things straight. However, gee, it seems that I do not stand alone—my thoughts are echoed by many others. I suppose I can mention the Giano case, since others have. Valued editors have left because of IRC crap. Other consequences have been that quality suffers. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 00:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

But these channels have caused many good things to happen, as well. At any given time there are hundreds of editors in the more prominent channels, where general discussion about Wikipedia ensues. MySpace, FaceBook, and whatever else won't replace that, as they are for social networking, which the Wikipedia-related IRC channels are not. In fact, bugs and errors have been reported there, and some of them were immediately addressed. Now, it would have taken much longer to go find a noticeboard or a village pump and post, and wait for a reply. Just one of the advantages... –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Aha! yes! I totally, absolutely, 100% agree that an IRC channel for reporting bugs and errors is a Good Thing. You have hit upon an instance where real-time response is indeed extremely helpful... as for the rest, why are folks spending time chatting instead of editing? And.. if they are chatting about specific articles... don't you think it should be on Article Talk where everyone could see it? Maybe Madame Smith, Famous Left-handed Sanskrit Interpretor, will see the commentary and point out valuable resources etc.? Or not even madame Smith.. maybe just Collge Student Jones who happens to be majoring in Left-handed Sanskrit Interpretation...? And back to the key point: the negatives outweigh the positives. IRC can come up in ArbCom cases, but still, people have more free reign to be Colluders, Conspirers or A**holes there than on Talk. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 01:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of people with hepatitis C

Matthew, thanks for your support of this list. I totally vandalized my own candidacy! Yah, I removed part of the page when I was addressing the suggestions. It happened in the middle of an edit conflict. Sorry about that. --Figureskatingfan (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 8)

Just to let you know I've left a few comments on the D:TNG S8 peer review, if you want any more comments or need me to do anything for it to get the approval it needs to be added to the seasons topic just let me know. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Good work in quickly adressing them, I've added some more comments and given a press release that I really hope you can use because it's got quite a bit of information in it. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 19:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. The Exec Producer has just posted a new press release on the Degrassi message boards, so it might be the same one. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

It probably is, it was a press release posted this morning. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 19:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I've left what should be a few last comments, looks ready for topic addition. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 23:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, I think everything is addressed now. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 23:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of railway stations in Greater Manchester

Sorry, I lost track of it. I supported :)--S_RX 20:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

FLC

So, when will you be ready for me to add your name to the list of directors at FLC? BTW, they are looking for a dispatch article for next week and I suggested that it could be an interview with you (nobody has responded yet), would that be alright with you? -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 18:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

You could do it some time this week if you wish. Just make sure that The Rambling Man is happy/ready. I saw you asked him if he intended to return to the directorship on his return. If he wants to, and we make my position temporary, that's fine with me.

I just saw his reply to your talk page too, and yeah, amongst other things my internet connection was down for a while. We've been having major money troubles recently, very stressful times, and WP hasn't been my main concern. Anyway, my wife and I have both got new jobs, we've got a new DSL provider instead of the cable company, and we're getting a new computer on Tuesday from Aaron Rents, so things are looking up.

With regards to an interview, sure, I'll do it. What does the process involve? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Matthew - you tell me when you're ready and I'll do the name-swapping! The Rambling Man (talk) 14:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I've got my spanking new puter and I'm ready now! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 03:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Great news. You got the job. Good luck with it. Don't hesitate to give me a shout if you need any help with anything list-related. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Ahoy hoy. I've been tasked by the WP:FCDW drill thrall to interview you as per Scorpion's suggestion above. I really don't pay any attention to FLC, never have, but I'll try to put some kind of interview together (just be prepared to be asked stupid questions :P) If you're up to it, drop me a line on my talk. Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 02:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I put down some opening questions here. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 11:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I will answer them in the morning. I had answered them earlier on but due a rather stressful day I forgot to hit save. Ah wells! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Ugh, I will do it tomorrow, I promise! When does it need to be done by? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I added a couple follow-up questions. Thanks for all your responses so far, we're definitely going to have to cut it down for the Signpost because you gave such detailed answers :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 16:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Lol, Scorpion said that too, but it's better than one liners! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 16:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

That is indeed true. I've cut some ancillary questions and some others I might fold into the introduction. Tony or someone might also do some slight paraphrasing (of course we're not going to totally change what you said... Or will we? :P) Thanks again for the time put into the interview. 13:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Pink Floyd discography

Why didn't the discography pass, three supports two opposes and i did everything you told me to do, so why? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Not completely. And The Rambling Man's concerns were largely unaddressed. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Who cears about the ramblin mans problems he is not the FLC director you are, three supports and two opposes and what tasks didn't i do which you said i should do? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 11:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

tell me. Im not patient so.

He has as much right to an opinion as anyone. His concerns were valid and were not addressed. Would you have addressed them if they had come from someone else? Please be aware that FLC is not a !Vote, but built on Consensus, and in fact WP:FLC says "FLCs with majority support can still fail if they do not fully meet the criteria." It is difficult to determine consensus when two supporting votes seemingly came out of nowhere, with no comments about the page while there were still things to be addressed. Support !votes do not hold as much weight as they used to, especially when they don't come with any comments as they appear to be drive-by !votes or an attempt to !vote-stack. Remember, There is no deadline, and you are always free to bring it back to FLC for another go. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, your right. Do you think that references needs direct sources?--Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 08:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

I think huggle auto-rollbacks. Sorry about those ones anyway. PXK ^T /_C 23:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

S'okay. Just try to monitor them ;) Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 00:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Awards

That's probably my first template-related request, or at least one of my first, major ones! Erm, well, I suggest you create new templates for each medium first, like the ones you suggested for television and film. Then we can work on each separately. I'd rather not touch the musician one if it doesn't need changing, which it doesn't as your list needs a television infobox instead.

1. Fifth one should be optional then, or we could just create a new template for you to use.
2. Can be done, but the musician infobox doesn't need one at the moment. We can do it to the television infobox version once that's created.
3. Same as above.
4. "Pending"?
5. Create them by copying and pasting.

Gary King (talk) 06:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

{{Infobox Musician Awards}} is only really used by myself, but if more people are going to use it, or variants of it, then we should lay out which awards should be included in the table. I think that awards that have their own articles are technically considered notable enough to be included (I say "technically" because I've come across many cases where an article existed for an award, but that was most likely because no one had found the article; otherwise, chances are that a lot of them would have been sent to AfD.) Articles can always use the custom entries if they need to add awards that aren't already included in the templates. Gary King (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes

bump. Nergaal (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

harmony out of chaos

Matthew, I wonder whether you might identify explicitly the points/clauses/sections that need to be synchronised, and lay them out at FLC talk? Tony (talk) 06:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 8)

On 29 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 8), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 09:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

The O.C. (season 3)

I realise you are probably a lot more busy now as FL director (congratulations btw), but was wondering if you get time could you take a look at the third season list and add any comments to the peer review. Thanks, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed review. I've made a start but only scratched the surface. I'm away for the weekend so I'll address the rest when I get back. Thanks once again, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 11:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, i've either addressed the issues or asked for clarification on a couple of things. Thanks, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 19:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I've dealt with the school name now, and listed the season for FLC. Many thanks, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)