MetlifeWP

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 26)

I am awaiting your feedback. WIll you please contribute to my idealistic article by providing my some positive criticism. I am leary about sending my sandbox edit as an afc submission without some kind reviews.--Joseph L. Russell, Jr. 20:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MetlifeWP/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! wia (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Wia & Wikisawesome. I can redit my article for a a more formal tone and subsequently add an introduction as a lead section. I don't wan my article to read like an essay, I can also edit as though summarizing as per discussions on user pages about two unique styles. --Joseph L. Russell, Jr. 13:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will" (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello! MetlifeWP, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will" (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello! MetlifeWP, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright

Your addition to Template:Merivale has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -gadfium 23:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roleplay (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andyjsmith (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Role-playing, you may be blocked from editing. Stop making gibberish edits! Andyjsmith (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

You do not know what you're talking about.--70.98.142.254 (talk) 20:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your comments on my talk page

I have removed your recent addition to my talk page because I couldn't understand what you were talking about. If you want a reply, please write clearly. Also, please place new comments at the bottom of the page in a new section - that's the correct etiquette. Thanks. Andyjsmith (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

I am willing to help less ambiguous terms and definitions.--70.98.142.254 (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Opinion Journalism

Hello, MetlifeWP. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Opinion Journalism".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

Just substandards like your are infinite. I work honestly at contributing and I unlike a socialized ambigious have worked since 1998 trying to learn Wikipedia. I am not challenged by your opinions nor feel I can't substantiate yours or my thought. It is imbalance you are looking forward telling. I place a proportional weight to your poor incongruence.--70.98.142.254 (talk) 20:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Andyjsmith (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Role-playing with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 19:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Please note that Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages are to contain links to pages with the subject words in the title, not substantive content, which belongs on the linked pages. In view of previous warnings, I must add: This is your last warning. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Roleplay (disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 19:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lottery of birth, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are continuing to add material to articles that is virtually meaningless. I don't actually understand what points you are trying to make - and neither do other editors - but I'm sure that (a) they are matters of OPINION not fact, which is forbidden in Wikipedia and (b) your English is so poor that what you write is GIBBERISH. Stop this at once! If you make this kind of edit again you will definite be banned from editing Wikipedia. Andyjsmith (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Social Media, Alternative News, & Criticism

Hello, MetlifeWP. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Social Media".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Andyjsmith (talk) 23:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Social Media, News, & its Criticism

Hello, MetlifeWP. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Social Media".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Andyjsmith (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:MetlifeWP/sandbox

Hello, MetlifeWP. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Andyjsmith (talk) 23:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Creating video amaphotography

Hello MetlifeWP,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Creating video amaphotography for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 21:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Copy protection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pascal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pseudolechriops because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. VQuakr (talk) 23:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mind-body effect

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mind-body effect, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andyjsmith (talk) 23:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Block

Hello MetlifeWP. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated urgings to stop, you continue to post unsourced and oftentimes incomprehensible additions to Wikipedia articles. If you wish to appeal this block, please use the template {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. You may find the guide to appealing blocks useful. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will" concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will", a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will"

Hello, MetlifeWP. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "An inabitrary opinion of "mans' will"".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Name

On this page you disclose that your name is Joseph. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I didn't claim my name was other than the name Joseph to the best of my knowledge.--70.98.142.254 (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)