User talk:Nyttend/Archive 54
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nyttend. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 50 | ← | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 |
 Talk page archives Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9 Archive 10 • Archive 11 • Archive 12 Archive 13 • Archive 14 • Archive 15 Archive 16 • Archive 17 • Archive 18 Archive 19 • Archive 20 • Archive 21 Archive 22 • Archive 23 • Archive 24 Archive 25 • Archive 26 • Archive 27 Archive 28 • Archive 29 • Archive 30 Archive 31 • Archive 32 • Archive 33 Archive 34 • Archive 35 • Archive 36 Archive 37 • Archive 38 • Archive 39 Archive 40 • Archive 41 • Archive 42 Archive 43 • Archive 44 • Archive 45 Archive 46 • Archive 47 • Archive 48 Archive 49 • Archive 50 • Archive 51 Archive 52 • Archive 53 • Archive 54 |
How does one protect articles?
Nyttend, I have been in an edit war with a revolving IP address users over the improper use of acronyms that violate English grammar rule—once an acronym has been defined it should not be repeatedly redefined in every following bulleted item in a list. I am getting tired of trying to teach this unregistered editor about English grammar rules. How do I request edit restriction on specific articles from IP user edits? --McChizzle (talk) 00:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Unexpected find...
Thank you, I did not expect to find that... - Adolphus79 (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome back!
Nice to see you editing, Nyttend! Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karawasi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rattle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Nyttend,
I was wondering what you would think of lifting protection on this talk page. You placed protection on it in 2015 because of vandalism but I was wondering if that problem might be over after 5 years. I have been evaluating talk pages with semi-protection to see if they can once again be open to all editors. What do you think about this one? Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 00:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Paraná Banco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not in english, no references to its size, or notability in general. Only uses the bank itself as source, with no third-party sources, which auto-fails WP:PSTS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
I noticed you previously opposed deletion of Paraná Banco, I have recently proposed its deletion again, which is something you may find of interest. Regards, Richevans69 (talk) 18:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Beaver Falls Cutlery Company
Hi Nyttend. Thank you very much for that information you left on my talk page, and for the very useful images. I have corrected the text of the above article on the basis of good faith, because you have better access to sources and local information in Penn than I do in England. I checked Whatmore, and the source agrees entirely with your information. I remember when I was putting the article together, I found conflicting information which I attempted to resolve. I am glad that you have now put it right. I have changed the image size of your new pictures to thumbnails, because fixed-size images cause problems with all the different-sized screens available now, and because some Wikipedians use a preference feature which allows them to view images at their chosen size (but that does not work with fixed-size images). I hope that's OK. The pictures are useful for local people and visitors who will now be able to stand on the spot where that history happened - an important aspect. Please let me know if you spot any other inconsistencies in the text. Storye book (talk) 10:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Iron Springs, Arizona for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iron Springs, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Springs, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Inadequate lead
Template:Inadequate lead has been nominated for merging with Template:Lead too short. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
"EPnnsylvania" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect EPnnsylvania should be deleted, kept, or re_targeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#EPnnsylvania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)