PikDig

Francisco Bangoy International Airport

Please look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Francisco_Bangoy_International_Airport, thank you for your commenting that if you could put some sources if Air Frontier will fly to Darwin, and if Asiana Airlines will fly to Seoul-Incheon, and Viva Macau will fly to Davao, for me as I am a Dabawenyo or from Davao that I would like to do that but Philippines AirAsia will fly connecting from Davao to Seoul-Incheon via Cebu and for Air Frontier is an International Airlines so we don't know yet if they will fly. Thank you for your cooperation. User: CloudyBark50924 (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Beijing and Kuala Lumpur

Please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#Disam_or_Not_to_Disam on why Beijing and Kuala Lumpur is disam. There are 2 airports in Beijing with passenger service, Capital and Nanyuan. Kuala Lumpur also has 2 airports KLIA (Sepang) and Subang that have passenger service. I fthere are one or more airport in a city that have passenger service then we disambiguate. Cashier freak (talk) 19:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Warning

Please don't remove info about airport terminals unless it's plain spam. Also, use the edit summery and work on the talk page before deleting. Laaa200 (talk) 01:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry, as I forgot to provide an edit summary. All I did was to merge the Terminal section with Terminal, airlines, and destinations section. pikdig (talk) 01:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

DG timetable

Hi PikDig, i noticed that u have edited the Kota Kinabalu International Airport page, in particular this edit. In the edit summary u mentioned 'DG timetable'. Im quite curious to know what is that? Thanks. ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 10:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh. Thanks. I just realised DG is the iata code for SEA Airlines. :) ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 10:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 03:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Intent with edit to the CA Zephyr article

Just curious, what was your intent with this edit [1]? What was there was the infobox had the "new" Zephyr routing, while the prose had a bulleted list of the "original" CA Zephyr routing. Post this edit we have redundant copies of the current routing, with no list of the original routing. Is this what you intended to to?

If your intent was to make the list into a table for the original routing, I can help with parts, as I took the original CZ from Salt Lake to Denver. Please advise Dave (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I didn't notice that that was the original routing. I made the table to make it similar to other Amtrak routes. pikdig (talk) 15:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

I agree that what was there had really poor formatting and needed to be improved. I'm not sure how to handle a former routing though. I think what you've done is a good idea, it's certainly more appealing that a bullet list. The problem is, the train depot on many of the cities no longer served has long been demolished, or converted to other uses. Any ideas on how to handle that? Dave (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

We could probably insert another section which contains former cities/towns served and the corresponding year they pulled-out of those communities. pikdig (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cebu Pacific logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cebu Pacific logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

The reviews and customer service section on Cebu Pacific's wiki page.

Dear Mr. Pigdig,

I understand that WE (and not me alone) stand in conflict of interest.

You've now several times deleted my contribution to Cebu Pacific's wikipedia profile. My added section basically talked about the initiative 'Let's make Cebu Pacific better!' which is an initiative taken up by customers, as a consequence of poor customer service provided by Cebu Pacific.

I (as the main person behind the initiative) understand that you see my contribution as a more of a promotion, rather than as a relevant piece of information on Cebu Pacific's reality. With your 'feedback' I can see how this could be misinterpreted. Though I still think it has the rights and need to be mentioned, and as more than just a reference at the bottom of the page. When reading, the now deleted section, I interpret it as neutral and is not being judgmental in a nonconstructive manner.

The section is furthermore well justified with multiple reliable sources and references which agrees that the content is both true and significant.

So - my question is to you; how could I mention this (the 'Let's make Cebu Pacific better!' project), without seeming to just promote, but while still pointing out the initiative as being more than just a blog post?

In your mail (user talk), you threaten with reporting me to Wikipedia for self promotion. I hope we won't have to go this far, since I guess I could accuse you for 'tendentious editing' and your 'lack of burden of proof'. So I really hope that we can work around this together and 'meet in the middle'.

Hope to hear from you soon, and kind regards

J.skafte (talk) 12:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Philippine Chapter in Philippine Youth Congress

I am glad to announce to you that we will be debuting as an organization at the Philippine Youth Congress in Information Technology on September 14 to 17, 2010 at the University of the Philippines, Diliman. Jojit will be Wikimedia Philippines resource speaker at the second day of the conference at the UP Film Center. He will be speaking about Wikipedia and how it revolutionizes the World Wide Web. That will be at 9:00 to 10:00 am. We will also set up a booth at the UP Bahay ng Alumni and we will showcase our existing and future projects. We encourage you to participate in our first major project. We have prepared food and refreshments for you. Please let us know so that we can enlist you to our delegation.--Exec8 (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ChicagoandSouthernAirLinesLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChicagoandSouthernAirLinesLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

APX vs PAL

APX will once again launch its codeshare agreement with PAL. I strongly recommend not to add destinations under PAL as it is OPERATED under APX.

Snippet from PAL website timetable

Zamboanga - Tawi Tawi

Departure: Zamboanga [ZAM] Zamboanga International Airport, Philippines

Arrival: Tawi Tawi [TWT] Tawitawi Domestic Airport

Departure Arrival Flight Stops Type M T W T F S S 07:40 08:40 PR243* 0 DH4

• Effective 21 October 2010: DEP 07:20 / ARR 08:20

(Operated by & Codeshared with AirPhil Express)

Kevin (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

General Santos International Airport

Hi there. I have updated the information in the Wikipedia about General Santos International Airport. The information I have added are more accurate. By the way, I am a resident of General Santos City since birth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakemonte80 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I have continuously reverted your edits for lack of references or sources. Thank you. pikdig (talk) 10:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Which one in particular? There may be no available online references for some of my updates but I can assure that all those are true. Do you have reference for "GenSan Pacific Cargo" and others? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakemonte80 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Do you have reference about the airport being the second largest in the Philippines? For sure it is the largest in the Island of Mindanao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakemonte80 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

As per WP:Verify sources are 'required. I removed the cargo airline you mentioned as an anon user has apparently added it. Regarding the other data, other users already added that long before and cited their source. Thank you. pikdig (talk) 14:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Also, there is no "VIP Lounge" in the terminal building. Only there is "the Mabuhay Lounge by Philippines Airlines". You have also missed to update other developments like the covered well wishers area adjacent to the terminal building. What about the transportation and access to the airport? you must also say something about it. I know what's going on at the airport here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakemonte80 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

you cannot just make another Wikipedia source as your reference. it's ought to be from an authentic online source somehow...and from what had happened 15 years ago were not religiously documented in the legitimate websites...these must be put into considerations as well. internet was not widely being used back th — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakemonte80 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

May you please cite the source in the article you claim comes from Wikipedia? If you wish to add information, please provide references. All the current data in that article has been based on previous research with references cited in the article itself or in the edit summary. Also, there are some non-notable stuff that should not be placed in the article. For example, well-wishers area. Regarding the transportation, it is indeed lax in information. However, there have been no reliable sources to update it. I understand that you're from GenSan and that you may know more about what's going on there than we do here on Wikipedia. However, please keep in mind and be guided that Wikipedia has a strict policy on original research. Thank you. pikdig (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Comes from "an authentic online source somehow", you say? Your additions does not come from "an authentic online source somehow" from what I see. Hence, why do you add it If you yourself says there has to be a reliable source for the things in Wikipedia? pikdig (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Philippine Airport Vandal

Hi! I'm kind of away from the computer today. Can you please revert the rest of 112.204.60.126's edits? HkCaGu (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi! This guy keeps reappearing on different IPs every few days. When you see him active again, can you please go to his contribution list and revert the rest of his edits which may not be on your watchlist? HkCaGu (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to do that, but I apologize if I can't because I don't have a stable internet connection. pikdig (talk) 14:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Urgent input needed at WP:AIRPORTS

Hi PikDig! We need to reach a consensus quickly on this discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#CO.2FUA_SOC_2011-11-30 regarding on how to list UA and CO in airport articles. Your comments are needed badly when you get a chance. Snoozlepet (talk) 04:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi PikDog! When you voted you put an exlamation point and not a number so if you could clarify which # you choose that would be great, Thanks! Cali4529 (talk) 11:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Bacolod-Silay International Airport

Mr. PikDig, let me state you reasons in why Bacolod-Silay International Airport's wiki page should be named by itself...

First of all, haven't you read this article? http://philippineairspace.blogspot.com/2011/12/bacolod-silay-to-open-international.html

Secondly, have you been to Bacólod? I have traveled four times in four airlines since December to Bacolod and they all say this: (read this guy's statement in an online forum) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=87140043&postcount=641

Third, do you even read the sources sighted in the article? The online sources mentioned says that the airport is already open for other carriers to service international flights. What do you call an airport that services and can service international flights? An INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT!

Fourth, and maybe not the last, Sir Nigel Villarete, the General Manager of Mactan-Cebu International Airport, did not dispute the name change of Bacolod-Silay Airport to Bacolod-Silay International Airport in an online forum and in fact congratulated our city and our airport management for already having a permanent CIQ http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=87181012&postcount=654. What is it when an airport has a CIQ (Customs, IMMIGRATION and Quarantine), with emphasis on IMMIGRATION? It's an INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT! Added notice, Sir Nigel Villarete was in charge of planning for the new airport in Silay so he would be first to protest the name change in that forum if it were "MALICIOUS".

Also, let me dispute you with this... Iloilo Airport, which has no CIQ (Customs, IMMIGRATION and QUARANTINE) and does NOT serve actual international flights and has not been classified by CAAP yet as such, has INTERNATIONAL in the wiki page while Bacolod-Silay INTERNATIONAL AIirport, which is serving actual international flights, you keep on reverting to a name without international? Even in official CAAP papers, the name remains as Iloilo Airport and NOT Iloilo International Airport. The name "Iloilo International Airport" stems from a wish by their LGU for international status and NOT and actual name change. I cannot understand why is it that in the real world, it's name convention is already BACOLOD-SILAY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT but in Wikipedia it couldn't.

Another thing, I chose the username RepublicaNegrense since I was born in Bacolod City, regularly travel in Bacolod City, vote in Bacolod City, own a house in Bacolod City, and is one of the bloggers accredited with Silay City Tourism Office. Does that not merit my edits some regard too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RepublicaNegrense (talk • contribs) 03:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great page on Seoul airport - so much easier than using the official airport page! YellowFratello (talk) 13:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings

Mr. PikDig, there is a 2 times a week Roxas-Cebu flight by Mid-Sea Express. You may contact them to verify it yourself. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ynn3k (talk • contribs) 10:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Ninoy Aquino International Airport

I think you have accidentally removed more than half of the Passenger table, but it's all good now, anyway you might want to use the Show preview feature before you Save your edits, cheers--Urville86 (talk) 23:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Oh my god! I didn't notice that. Thanks for the heads up! pikdig (talk) 11:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Merry Xmas!

Snoozlepet (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

NAIA Air route map

Good day! Can I request for a more updated air route map for Ninoy Aquino International Airport? A lot of flights has been travelling to Manila and the map was not up-to-date. Thanks. --JoeCo0327 (talk) 05:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Your recent editing history at Iloilo International Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. WikiPuppies _bark ^dig 18:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the warning. However, I was just reverting his edits based on the guidelines on the infobox usage. Furthermore, if you go through the page's history, you would see that what he has done has also been reverting by a prior user. Lastly, if you also go through his edit summaries on the page's history, it might be assumed that the said user also violates WP:OR. However, as to not violate the 3RR, I will halt reverting his incorrect additions based on the guidelines setforth on the infobox template page. pikdig (talk) 18:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism

Can you explain this please [[2]]? how is what I did vandalism? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Good Day! I am sorry for any possible misunderstanding that I may have caused. What was vandalism was the first edit of an anon that added the 'Future Airlines and Destinations' section as these are all unsourced and mere 'wild' speculation. Furthermore, as per WP:Airports policy, only future service with announced start dates should be listed on the destination section. I assume that your reversion of reverting the edit before yours (by re-adding the said section in question) was done in good faith. Hence, my comment of 'vandalism' was not directed at you. pikdig (talk) 13:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Good enough for me thanks. I had reverted because I saw a section blanking so I just didn't know what you saw that I didn't. Cheers. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Laguindingan International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{airport-dest-list

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Tagalog help needed

Hello PikDig, I'm contacting you because we need some Tagalog translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Tagalog Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Codeshare Flights

Hi PikDig, I just noticed that you recently reverted my edit regarding the "Philippine Airlines operated by Cathay Pacific" in Mactan-Cebu International Airport, stating "Codeshare flights not to be listed under WP:Airports policy" whereas you placed "Philippine Airlines operated by PAL Express" in your latest edit. I am confused what really is the rule of the Airport Pages, as I tried to read the policy, it is not stated there about the "Codeshare flights not to be listed", and some other Airport pages are currently placing the codeshare flights. Please take note on this matter. Also, Philippine Airlines is currently serving Mactan - Hong Kong direct flights currently operated by Cathay Pacific. Thank you.

Hi anon user! Please refer to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airports/page_content, specifically, the example table and Items 2 & 3 under body. Philippine Airlines operated by PAL Express is acceptable under project guidelines since the flight is marketed by Philippine Airline and uses PR flight number only per timetables and booking engines (item 3). Philippine Airlines operated by Cathay Pacific is not acceptable since the flight carries the CX flight number and PR is a secondary flight number (item 2). If you can direct me to other airport ages that have codeshare flights listed, please do so so that I can correct these. Thanks! pikdig (talk) 02:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mactan–Cebu International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | [[Ninoy Aquino International Airport|Manila]], [[Los Angeles International Airport|Los Angeles]] (begins March 15, 2016,<ref>{{cite news|title=PAL to launch Cebu-Los Angeles direct flights in 2016|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

China Eastern Airlines in Mactan-Cebu International Airport

Hello PikDig,

Please add China Eastern Airline as destinations in MCIA since it has Charter flights from Guangzhou. Source: http://aviability.com/flight-number/flight-mu2625-china-eastern-airlines or http://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/mu2625/ Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzyxwilson (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PikDig. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PikDig. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Pinoy edit a thon @ OSU

Who: All members of the public

What: Filipino American History Month-themed Edit a thon at Ohio State University.

When: Saturday 20 October 2018, 4:00PM EST / 1600 until 4:55PM PST / 1655

Where: Eighteenth Avenue Library, Ohio State University

Sponsor: WikiConference North America 2018
San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PikDig. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)