User talk:ScottyBerg/Archives/2010/November

Thanks

For your thoughtful yet largely unhelpful comments on my UserTalk page.Seeing as you and I disagree on the adequate application of policy as well as your continued stalking of my edits, I am arriving at the conclusion that your comments are not altruistically-driven or even remotely accurate. I politely request that you make every effort to avoid posting to my page in the future, except in those instances where notification is mandated. I will extend your the same courtesy, and will see a breach of my request as harassment. This might alter at some future point, but I am fairly convinced that we have little positive to say to one another at this time. Good editing. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Your question to Kim at my RfA

I believe Kim was referring to User_talk:Sphilbrick/Archive_2009#Tendentious_editing.

Admittedly not my finest moment, but I didn't appreciate the accusation. I wish I had responding more calmly. --SPhilbrickT 19:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I'm interested less in that exchange than in the underlying sentiment behind it. ScottyBerg (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

There is no doubt that this wasn't the finest moment from Guettarda - and it wasn't the civility or tone in the exchange that i'm referring to - but rather the rationale given by you. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to remove the above if you think that it shouldn't be here. It is not my intention to discuss - but just to clarify :) --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 20:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)