User talk:Shutterbug/Archive3

If you are looking for old talks: I archived them here, here and here. After 19 August 2007 sections older than 7 days will be automatically archived to User talk:Shutterbug/Archive/Archive-Dec2024. Sections without timestamps will not be archived.

Is something going on?

I saw your edits today, and they're leaning very, very close to violating Wikipedia:Verifiability. With your history here, and prior editing history as COFS, you really can't afford to do that. As is, you're already a single-purpose account, and have had trouble with admins before. Heck, you were nearly banned. I don't want to see that happen, and I think you have perfectly valid contributions to make to Scientology-related articles, but showing up for a day of introducing factual errors is not going to look good to anyone. Your edits here and here were, to put it gently, inaccurate. The sources didn't say what you said they did. Please don't do that anymore. --GoodDamon 17:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Nothing is going on. The usual people with the usual phrases doing the usual propaganda campaign using the usual pro-bias weaknesses of Wikipedia. Shutterbug (talk) 02:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow, welcome back. It was a couple months ago that I wrote that. But where was the propaganda? I reverted those edits because the refs simply didn't say what you said they did. How is that propaganda on my part? Well, in any event, hopefully see you around. --GoodDamon 03:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)