Spicy
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
edit| January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunuraju/Archive
editI just seen that this was closed. Was the behavioral evidence reviewed? I am not sure how much more evidence would be required. I have a ton I can post but as stated I didn't want to create an even larger wall of text. CNMall41 (talk) 04:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Of course it was. It should tell you something that at least 4 CUs/admins looked at that case and all of them declined to block. Spicy (talk) 10:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- There were blocks of other accounts, but I am speaking specifically about Sunuraju. Izno stated on 11/16 that they declined to block (on the behavior evidence presented at that time) but there was a reasonably valid concern of UPE. I offered to provide more evidence (again, tried to avoid a wall of text as I know reviewing all that information takes time) and noted private email evidence was sent. Didn't get a reply to anything until I saw it closed and came here. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware of which accounts I checked, thank you. Users (some of which are socks) collaborating on drafts of popular TV shows and movies isn't especially convincing evidence. For instance, see all of the edits that were made to Wicked (2024 film) while it was in draftspace. My opinion - and Izno's too, it seems - are that there are reasonable grounds for suspicion of UPE or improper coordination, but the evidence is not strong enough to sustain a block for such. The fact that the case stayed open for more than a month with no action towards Sunuraju suggests that numerous others also looked at it and did not find the evidence sufficiently convincing. SPI isn't the proper venue for UPE concerns anyway. Those should go to COIN or ANI. Spicy (talk) 21:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- "I'm aware of which accounts I checked, thank you" - Sorry, I was not aware of what evidence was/wasn't looked at which is why I mentioned it- I only know the blocks that I saw and don't have access/privilege to review anything that isn't publicly visiable. I am wondering if the email evidence sent to the paid editing group was evaluated as it contains a ton of evidence showing the accounts are socks. Yes, it can be handled at COIN, but there is also information on socks which is why I mention it. Not trying to hammer this, but it's a large UPE sock farm as documented in that email. It was referenced a few times but hoping someone took a look. At this point, there doesn't seem to be an appetite for it so I will bow out (and out of the India/Pakistan film space altogether), but noting that it will continue to be an issue. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware of which accounts I checked, thank you. Users (some of which are socks) collaborating on drafts of popular TV shows and movies isn't especially convincing evidence. For instance, see all of the edits that were made to Wicked (2024 film) while it was in draftspace. My opinion - and Izno's too, it seems - are that there are reasonable grounds for suspicion of UPE or improper coordination, but the evidence is not strong enough to sustain a block for such. The fact that the case stayed open for more than a month with no action towards Sunuraju suggests that numerous others also looked at it and did not find the evidence sufficiently convincing. SPI isn't the proper venue for UPE concerns anyway. Those should go to COIN or ANI. Spicy (talk) 21:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- There were blocks of other accounts, but I am speaking specifically about Sunuraju. Izno stated on 11/16 that they declined to block (on the behavior evidence presented at that time) but there was a reasonably valid concern of UPE. I offered to provide more evidence (again, tried to avoid a wall of text as I know reviewing all that information takes time) and noted private email evidence was sent. Didn't get a reply to anything until I saw it closed and came here. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Account
editWhen I create an account on Wikipedia, why does the site automatically delete my account? Please help! Abduvaitov Sherzod 56789 (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
As the days start getting longer
edit
Hello Spicy: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Schazjmd (talk) 17:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
edit Hello Spicy: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Seasonal greetings!
edit
Happy Yuletide! 
Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!) 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
edit
|
mery cristmas |
| You beat me again this year! Merry Christmas to one of our most underappreciated editors. Oh, and I know you love raw meat, but don't forget to cook the turkey first. Cheers, Giraffer (talk) 23:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays
edit
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025! |
|
Hello Spicy, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Poorly drawn giraffe eats christmas tree.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Poorly drawn giraffe eats christmas tree.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 03:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)