List of animals in fiction

edit

Hi, I'm a New Page Reviewer and I note you recently created a List page called "List of animals in fiction" which completely duplicates the function of existing lists. See List of miscellaneous fictional animals and see also many other individual lists named in Lists of fictional animals.

Rather than either approve the page or flag the article for deletion, I propose to blank that page and turn it into a simple WP:REDIRECT to List of miscellaneous fictional animals. You might want to check whether any content will be lost when I do this, and move it over beforehand. Note that it if you miss that opportunity, it will always be possible to look back at the Page History to view past content and copy it over later. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Starfruitftw, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Starfruitftw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The only fictional chocolate tester

edit

Hello Starfruitftw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The only fictional chocolate tester for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Willy Wonka.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of fictional analysts for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional analysts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional analysts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have packaged your other lists of fictional characters into the deletion discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Creating trivial lists

edit

Please stop creating trivial lists, especially while other lists you have created are still being considered for deletion. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is it a fansite. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:F11B:E449:55C1:762E (talk) 21:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:11F0:F11B:E449:55C1:762E (talk) 21:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

This refers to removal of the external links section and persistent addition of unsourced content. 2601:188:180:11F0:F11B:E449:55C1:762E (talk) 21:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:11F0:F11B:E449:55C1:762E (talk) 21:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
admin 1
Note 4
USERS 1