Whpq

Draft:Mrs Chukwunenye Anyadiegwu

Hi Whpq,

I'd appreciate your advice on the above, which was nominated for Speedy Deletion by another user without specifying a valid criterion and so untagged by you. Having looked at the history etc. this appears to have been written by the subject's 15yo son and then draftified by perhaps a relatively inexperienced new page patroller, when I think it should probably have been speedy deleted under A7 instead (per WP:Drafts "don't draftify junk") as it's a single sentence, wrongly titled, makes no assertion of notability, sole contributor has a COI, may be self-promotion (the author's user page was also a draft autobiography before it was blanked)... Now it's a draft I don't think it's eligible for A7 but speedy del does seem the right way forward. Do I need to PROD / xfD it? YFB ¿ 00:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

WP:PROD only applies to articles and files. You could nominate it at WP:MFD, but I would recommend to just ignore it. Nobody appears to be doing any editing on the draft so it will disappear via WP:G13 in six months without need to waste other editors time in reviewing a deletion nomination. See also Wikipedia:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. -- Whpq (talk) 00:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I'd missed that about PROD scope. Will ignore as suggested. YFB ¿ 05:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

CSD vandalism tag on User:Charlesbeaulne08/sandbox

@Whpq

Check the last paragraph, first sentence; subtle vandalism which makes it obvious the entire article is a prank. Qcne (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out. I've deleted it as A10 rather than A3 as that material is disparaging and not sourced. -- Whpq (talk) 15:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Qcne (talk) 15:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Vee Parker.jpg

Hi Whpq. What do you think is the best way to deal with File:Vee Parker.jpg? It seems like a copyrighted screenshot that's incorrectly licensed as {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. It might be OK to convert to {{Non-free television screenshot}}, but the source is a bit sketchy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

The license is obviously not correct. Fandom is CC licensed but not the screen shots. You could convert to nonfree with the assumption this is a true screen shot (very likely true), or if you have doubts about sourcing, you could just replace it with an image with verifiable sourcing. -- Whpq (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at this. I'll try to explain this to the file's uploader. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

• Crisco 1492

• Babajobu
• Daniel
• Elf
• Jayron32
• Thue
• Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

Maxim

Oversighter changes

Maxim

Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
• Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.

Technical news

• Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

• RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.

Miscellaneous

• An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Oops

Can you delete Talk:Oviul Maruf, too? Thanks. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 14:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Done. -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom Notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Mistreated and Inhumanity blocking to Royiswariii and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Royiswariii Talk! 05:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

The case request has been declined as premature because other dispute resolution steps would need to be used first before requesting arbitration. SilverLocust 💬 10:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Opperman Unicar

It seems that the section of information regarding the Opperman Unicar was recently deleted from the Opperman page, due to it being largely copied from the Williams Microcars website. That is actually my website, and I am also the one that put the info and photos on Wikipedia, so that there would be an easy-to-find, comprehensive source of Opperman automobile data and history. Otherwise there is basically no other source of accurate data regarding the Unicar, due to the age and extreme rarity of the cars, along with several bits of misinformation that has been spread over the years. So if permission is needed to use that deleted information, then I obviously give it (as I wrote it), and it would be excellent to have it restored, if possible. Guards951 (talk) 21:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

@Guards951 (talk page watcher) While it's okay to donate the text to Wikipedia, you would have to be okay with someone hypothetically printing out the text and selling it; you would also have to be okay with someone actually and inevitably changing the text itself. One copyright license compatible with this is the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Given the fact that Wikipedia is an educational encyclopedia, and the Williams Microcar website is a personal website, it's probably better to use the {{COI edit}} template on the aricle talk page to request someone rephrase what you said with a more formal tonality. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for specific details. Note that you will still need to provide sources for the information. -- Whpq (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

• Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
• Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
• Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Herbert Schröder.png

Hello so around a few hours ago, I had received a message on my talk page regarding the file's deletion. I am curious as to why as his Imago image was one of the few images of Schröder with a reasonable resolution. He has also been deceased for 24 years, so I'm admittedly confused regarding how a non-free image from a press agency are considered invalid, especially regarding individuals that have no free images available on Commons. SuperSkaterDude45 (discusión) 05:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

As noted on your talk page, the file was deleted per WP:F7. Images which are from commercial photo agencies do not meet WP:NFCC#2 (commercial opportunity) as their usage on Wikipedia for visual identification of the subject does compete with the photo agencies commercial use of the photo which they license for media to use for the same purpose. -- Whpq (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Re: Sub-Zero image

Looking at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Editing_images, the guideline indicates that flipping the image should not happen in instances where it can mislead the viewer or in the cases of identifiable landmarks are features. In this case though, the character's design as shown in the image in question is symmetrical; reversing it changes none of the details nor misleads the reader.

Asking about this because I recall seeing a few instances of this done without issue over the years (though off the top of my head can't remember specifically which ones), and moreso editors oppose using images that look away from the text. Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Is the design completely symmetrical? The drape of the clothing has one side over top the other. I suppose this is unlikely to to mislead the viewer, but as an encyclopedia, we should not really be modifying the image from what was actually illustrated. Perhaps you can fund another image posed facing the other way. -- Whpq (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Swaminarayan Akshardham (New Jersey)

@Whpq, thanks for the opportunity to discuss the BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Robbinsville. I've left my thoughts on that talk page, but wanted to also raise some concerns as I looked through the related Swaminarayan Akshardham (New Jersey) page.

Here's my quick review of what's been going on there the last two months:

1. The first time Ratnahastin seemed to engage on the article was on 09/23, when they copied info from the body of the article to the lead, but changed info that was originally presented in a neutral manner to an unbalanced POV. [1]

2. This was eventually reverted by Ram112313 [2], and subsquently restored by Ratnahastin instead of following WP:BRD [3]

3. Ram112313 reverted again [4], and started a talk page discussion [5]. At some point, it also looks like Ram112313 tried to engage with Ratnahastin on their talk page. [6]

4. It seems like other users (Eucalyptusmint) also got involved and tried to ask Ratnahastin for clarity [7] - but there was no response and the conversation fizzled out on 10/6

5. The issue resurfaced almost a month later on 10/29 when another user (Charleswain) came and restored the same POV content Ratnahastin had originally posted [8]. Some edit warring ensued despite repeated attempts to engage on the talk page. A few days later on 11/06, another user still (Capitals00) came onto the page and took the same approach [9].

7. Neither of these users had been active on the page previously, and both continued to alternatively restore the same bit of content without engaging in the ongoing requests on the talk page. There was no clarification as to the rationale for adding this content to the lead.

8. In the mean time, it looks like Ratnahastin submitted a request to block Ram112313 for two weeks for 'edit warring' [10] and they ultimately restored the content [11] violating [WP:3RR]

9. When I saw the repeated edit warring on my watchlist, I raised the talk page conversation again [12], with finally some engagement from Ratnahastin- who eventually added some more context to the lead after their initial POV push.

10. I see that Ratnahastin has previously received a topic ban [13], and during their appeal they stated [14]: I will avoid making any edits that might be deemed promoting a POV. If I get reverted, I will seek consensus on the talk page and refrain from edit warring . I will not accuse or cast aspersions against any fellow editor. I will maintain civility and take additional time to seek the consensus. I find this commitment by Ratnahastin especially interesting because it doesn't look like they take the time to seek consensus and have instead been engaged in strategic edit warring to POV push in the article.

11. Of note, this approach is not limited to the Swaminarayan Akshardham page - one other recent example is the Sabarmati Report page where Ratnahastin got a user banned [15] over the word 'negative'

Would appreciate your thoughts given your involvement on the adjacent BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Robbinsville page. Schwinnspeed (talk) 06:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

File:HarrisRosen.jpeg

Do you think File:HarrisRosen.jpeg would be OK to treat a {{Non-free biog pic}}? There are what look to be some other images of Rosen found here, but none seem (at least at first glance) to be freely licensed. The uploader of the file didn't select a license so the file seems to have been tagged for speedy deletion as part of the the upload process. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)