Wwwwolf

Archives
2004–2005 15 January 2006 – 28 June 2006 29 June 2006 – 31 December 2006 1 January 2007 – 17 June 2007 18 June 2007 – 31 December 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 – 2017

Chykka listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chykka. Since you had some involvement with the Chykka redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Need help

I am trying to find out if there was a page titled Carol Slade. If so, why was it deleted and can i get it reinstated as she has become

The Ms Senior NJ 2017 and went on to win the Ms Senior America 2017. She tells me she was  on wikipedia and now 8 

Dont see her.

Should i just creat a whole new page for her? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by CurlyDancerKP (talk • contribs) 00:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Replied on talk page --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wwwwolf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Codex colored.png

Thank you for uploading File:Codex colored.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

"Orion CEV" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orion CEV. Since you had some involvement with the Orion CEV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 16:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Re Gopi Warrier entry on Wikipedia

I am only a user/supporter and have contributed very little - I have worked with Gopi Warrier for 36 years and am puzzled as to why someone keeps on removing the photo of a portrait drawing I did of him (and hold copyright). I am an artist and use my maiden name during my portrait drawing career Sarah Merton. My father was John Merton ( well known portrait painter in UK. Deceased} Gopi Warrier is not on social media and does not have any photographs of himself preferring to show only this portrait drawing.

The reason it is important to have an image of him is that there are two Gopi Warriers - both Indian but with very different interests. It is important that Gopi Warrier Indian Poet (as listed in Wiki) is recognised by his image by his students and friends and anyone wishing to find out about him - that they are not confused by different images that appear on Google and that it should be clear on Wikipedia they find what they are looking for. Presently the image has been reintroduced but several times it has been removed by an editor - but being a complete novice I am not sure how to try and ensure the image is not removed again.

Please help - this to me is a bit of a wilderness. Thank you for your time if you read this, With regards, Sarah Morritt ss.morritt@gmail.com Sarah Morritt (talk) 12:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Character editor

The article Character editor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Request for deleted Wikipedia Page for Zeng Keni

Dear Wwwwolf,

I would like to request the userfied version of the deleted page for Zeng Keni (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeng_Keni) to this email michling97@qq.com. In addition, I wanted to ask if it is appropriate for me to recreate the page for this person and update the information on the page. Very appreciative of your help thank you!(I hope I signed this post correctly I am quite new to Wikipedia) Notyourstar0609 (talk) 08:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Retrieving information

Greetings

I am in need of assistance I made a mistake of writing an article about myself unaware that it was against Wikipedia guidelines I would ask that you may retrieve the information for to be used on my user page

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sisto Di Boto (talk • contribs) 12:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

The Racing Madness Wiki

I'm an admin for the Racing Madness Wiki, a FANDOM site that covers all info on the Racing Madness games, https://racingmadness.fandom.com/wiki/Home. Anybody who is interested can hop aboard! Mountain4567 (talk · contribs) 71.178.26.30 (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC) 71.178.26.30 (talk) 22:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:MUD clients

A tag has been placed on Category:MUD clients indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Paper doll (video games) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paper doll (video games) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper doll (video games) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)