Please add new comments at the end of this page - I moved your help request down there.  Chzz  ►  01:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit
- Welcome-
 
Cookies to welcome you!  
Hello, Ynottry! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Brambleclawx and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia! If you need help, try looking at some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Brambleclawx 16:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Help re references

edit

{{helpme}} Where do you find a list or link to pages needing citations?

 
When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured to the right.
Try Category:Articles lacking sources; see also WP:CLEANUP.  Chzz  ►  01:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit
 
Hello, Ynottry. You have new messages at Charlesdrakew's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'm glad to see the sources you added at Clinton High School (Clinton, Tennessee). Keep up the good work! --Orlady (talk) 00:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Hey thanks, Orlady. I lived in Knoxville for years, and share your interest in the state. By the way, I'm simply using the free sources on Google News Archive. Ynottry (talk) 02:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)YnottryReply

Yes, it's often easy to find the references that an article needs, but it doesn't happen unless someone goes to the trouble of finding them and adding them. I appreciate your contributions to improving the quality of these articles. --Orlady (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Useful?

edit

Hi again

I'm pleased to see the references going in. You might find this helpful. If not feel free to delete it.--Charles (talk) 10:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tip of the day...
 
Watching for changes

Clicking the "Recent changes" link in the interaction menu on every page will give you a list of all edits in the last few minutes. If you just want to watch for changes to articles you have edited, use your Watchlist. You can add articles to your Watchlist by clicking "Watch this page" tab (starred) at the top of any article (the talk page will be auto-watched, too). You can click "Related changes" in the toolbox menu on any page to see changes made to the pages linked from the one you are viewing. And finally, you can click the "My contributions" link to view a log of your edits; if yours is no longer the edit marked with "top", then someone else has edited the page.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use
{{tip of the day}}

Thanks Charles, but that all over my head. --Ynottry (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)YnottryReply

Today's offering is way over my head too. Better luck tomorrow.--Charles (talk) 20:35, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Today's tip is really helpful. I see now that the content is dynamic. Ynottry (talk) 02:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)YnottryReply

Over excited robot

edit

Deleting large chunks of text at one go can trigger the anti-vandal robot, Cluebot, to revert the edit which is what happened on Scotsboro Boys. I put back the work that you had done which the robot wrongly interpreted as vandalism. Please do not be detered.--Charles (talk) 21:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Charles. Did you fix the orphaned refs as well?

What do you think about length now? Also, is the "Detailed summary" OK? Would it be better to replace the lead with the "Detailed summary?" Finally, how do I get the lead back above the table of contents? Thanks for your encouragement. Ynottry (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)YnottryReply

Taking the last point first I removed the level 1 header and bolded the subject title in the first line as per the Manual of Style which has sorted out the table of contents.
It was another robot that fixed up the references. When the same reference is used more than once the full template is used the first time but subsequently just the reference name can be used like this <ref name=(name)/> to keep the edit window less cluttered and for tidiness. If you open the page history you can see who did what. You have your watch list set up to see when things are changed?
The length of article looks ok from a brief look through. The present lead is much too short and it would be good to merge it into the overview section as the lead. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section) has all the detail. The featured article leads which are on the front page each day also show best practice and some of them are interesting too.--Charles (talk) 11:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Charles for fixing things in the Scottsboro Boys article. I've merged the detailed summary into the lead per your suggestions. You're right--it is much better. Ynottry (talk) 05:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC)YnottryReply

Civil Rights Movement

edit

Hi, in my comment at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968)#Proposed_Move I've informally suggested Civil Rights Movement (United States, 1955–1968) (etc.) as an alternative. What do you think of that? (replying there, if you choose to reply, would be preferable to me - thanks). --Born2cycle (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
Community 2
HOME 1
Interesting 1
languages 3
Note 1
os 4
text 1
Users 1