In the Standard Model of electroweak interactions of particle physics, the weak hypercharge is a quantum number relating the electric charge and the third component of weak isospin. It is frequently denoted and corresponds to the gauge symmetry U(1).[1][2]

It is conserved (only terms that are overall weak-hypercharge neutral are allowed in the Lagrangian). However, one of the interactions is with the Higgs field. Since the Higgs field vacuum expectation value is nonzero, particles interact with this field all the time even in vacuum. This changes their weak hypercharge (and weak isospin T3). Only a specific combination of them, (electric charge), is conserved.

Mathematically, weak hypercharge appears similar to the Gell-Mann–Nishijima formula for the hypercharge of strong interactions (which is not conserved in weak interactions and is zero for leptons).

In the electroweak theory SU(2) transformations commute with U(1) transformations by definition and therefore U(1) charges for the elements of the SU(2) doublet (for example lefthanded up and down quarks) have to be equal. This is why U(1) cannot be identified with U(1)em and weak hypercharge has to be introduced.[3][4]

Weak hypercharge was first introduced by Sheldon Glashow in 1961.[4][5][6]

Definition

edit

Weak hypercharge is the generator of the U(1) component of the electroweak gauge group, SU(2)×U(1) and its associated quantum field B mixes with the W3 electroweak quantum field to produce the observed
Z
gauge boson and the photon of quantum electrodynamics.

The weak hypercharge satisfies the relation

      

where Q is the electric charge (in elementary charge units) and T3 is the third component of weak isospin (the SU(2) component).

Rearranging, the weak hypercharge can be explicitly defined as:

      

Fermion
family
Left-chiral fermions Right-chiral fermions
Electric
charge
Q
Weak
isospin

T3
Weak
hyper-
charge
YW
Electric
charge
Q
Weak
isospin

T3
Weak
hyper-
charge
YW
Leptons
ν
e
,
ν
μ
,
ν
τ
0 +1/2 −1 νR
May not exist
0 0 0

e
,
μ
,
τ
−1 1/2 −1
e
R
,
μ
R
,
τ
R
−1 0 −2
Quarks
u
,
c
,
t
+2/3 +1/2 +1/3
u
R
,
c
R
,
t
R
+2/3 0 +4/3
d, s, b 1/3 1/2 +1/3
d
R
,
s
R
,
b
R
1/3 0 2/3

where "left"- and "right"-handed here are left and right chirality, respectively (distinct from helicity). The weak hypercharge for an anti-fermion is the opposite of that of the corresponding fermion because the electric charge and the third component of the weak isospin reverse sign under charge conjugation.

 
Weinberg angle   and relation between coupling constants g, g′, and e. Adapted from Lee (1981).[7]
Interaction
mediated
Boson Electric
charge
Q
Weak
isospin
T3
Weak
hypercharge
YW
Weak
W±
±1 ±1 0

Z0
0 0 0
Electromagnetic
γ0
0 0 0
Strong
g
0 0 0
Higgs
H0
0 1/2 +1
 
The pattern of weak isospin, T3, and weak hypercharge, YW, of the known elementary particles, showing electric charge, Q , along the Weinberg angle. The neutral Higgs field (circled) breaks the electroweak symmetry and interacts with other particles to give them mass. Three components of the Higgs field become part of the massive W and Z bosons.

The sum of −isospin and +charge is zero for each of the gauge bosons; consequently, all the electroweak gauge bosons have

      

Hypercharge assignments in the Standard Model are determined up to a twofold ambiguity by requiring cancellation of all anomalies.

Alternative half-scale

edit

For convenience, weak hypercharge is often represented at half-scale, so that

      

which is equal to just the average electric charge of the particles in the isospin multiplet.[8][9]

Baryon and lepton number

edit

Weak hypercharge is related to baryon number minus lepton number via:

      

where X is a conserved quantum number in GUT. Since weak hypercharge is always conserved within the Standard Model and most extensions, this implies that baryon number minus lepton number is also always conserved.

Neutron decay

edit

     
n

p
+
e
+
ν
e

Hence neutron decay conserves baryon number B and lepton number L separately, so also the difference BL is conserved.

Proton decay

edit

Proton decay is a prediction of many grand unification theories.  

Hence this hypothetical proton decay would conserve BL , even though it would individually violate conservation of both lepton number and baryon number.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Donoghue, J.F.; Golowich, E.; Holstein, B.R. (1994). Dynamics of the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press. p. 52. ISBN 0-521-47652-6.
  2. ^ Cheng, T.P.; Li, L.F. (2006). Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-851961-3.
  3. ^ Tully, Christopher G. (2012). Elementary Particle Physics in a Nutshell. Princeton University Press. p. 87. doi:10.1515/9781400839353. ISBN 978-1-4008-3935-3.
  4. ^ a b Glashow, Sheldon L. (February 1961). "Partial-symmetries of weak interactions". Nuclear Physics. 22 (4): 579–588. Bibcode:1961NucPh..22..579G. doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2.
  5. ^ Hoddeson, Lillian; Brown, Laurie; Riordan, Michael; Dresden, Max, eds. (1997-11-13). The rise of the Standard Model: A history of particle physics from 1964 to 1979 (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 14. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511471094. ISBN 978-0-521-57082-4.
  6. ^ Quigg, Chris (2015-10-19). "Electroweak symmetry breaking in historical perspective". Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. 65 (1): 25–42. arXiv:1503.01756. Bibcode:2015ARNPS..65...25Q. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102313-025537. ISSN 0163-8998.
  7. ^ Lee, T.D. (1981). Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory. Boca Raton, FL / New York, NY: CRC Press / Harwood Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-3718600335 – via Archive.org.
  8. ^ Peskin, Michael E.; Schroeder, Daniel V. (1995). An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0-201-50397-5.
  9. ^ Anderson, M.R. (2003). The Mathematical Theory of Cosmic Strings. CRC Press. p. 12. ISBN 0-7503-0160-0.
  NODES
see 2
Story 1