Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2suit (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to sex in space. Stifle (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2suit

No evidence of notability. — Swpb^{τ • c} 01:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I actually came across this article by chance today. Although there are references they are just the standard "news pieces about interesting things that no one will remember in the next 24 hour news cycle". Not notable and is lacking in purpose. mboverload @ 03:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete found another source on MSNBC, although I think Mboverload is right in his assertion that this is just a nonnotable news piece. --Banime (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Sex in space as was suggested repeatedly in the previous AfD. VG ☎ 01:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Sex in space, edit for brevity. It is notable enough to be mentioned. MagnesianPhoenix (talk) 05:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I belive the suit itself has not got a huge notabillity, so lets Merge it into Sex in space. abf /talk to me/ 15:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge (selectively merge) into Sex in space. Too lightweight to stand alone. Edison (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.