Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ai Uehara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ai Uehara

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not my field, but I doubt that any of these awards are notable. DGG ( talk ) 21:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Judging adult actresses is not my cup of tea, but this is one even I heard of, since she has been on regular TV and in the news. So in terms of WP:GNG, there is a lot to consider, all these being major media sources (not adult sites): [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], etc. I cannot judge the awards, but these sources say she was the best selling AV actress for a while with a big following even in China. Michitaro (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Nothing special here, GNG not met, notoriety is not necessarily notability. Montanabw^(talk) 06:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet notability guidelines for actors / adult actors; the coverage offered above is insufficient for GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.