Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amile Waters (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amile Waters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Once the unsourced, self-sourced, and unreliably sourced junk is cleared out, there's not even an assertion of notability. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per nom.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-as non notable porno actress, hasn't won any significant/notable awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG --–Davey2010^Talk 17:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources to support notability claims. No objective PORNBIO claim even before the nominator pruned the article. Claims of notability as an artist and as a sportscaster are based on self-published sources. Independent search for RS coverage yields only cast listings in the porn trade press. Take your pick: fails WP:GNG, WP:PORNBIO, WP:ARTIST/WP:JOURNALIST and WP:ENT. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.