Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archana Paneru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lacks reliable sourcing to verify claims. Drmies (talk) 21:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archana Paneru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person that fails WP:ACTOR and WP:PORN Legacypac (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article contains notable sources. for example the post by kantipur dainik.49.126.157.209 (talk) 12:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia where your first post ever is on this deletion discussion. I'm assuming you may not be familiar with our inclusion policies Legacypac (talk) 17:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am new here but I can say this article (created by me) is notable. This article is about the first pornstar of Nepal. For proof about her you can check the official website of Kantipur in the reference section provided in the article.KW Star 04:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First porn star in the country could be a valid claim to notability. Does she meet the requirements of WP:ACTOR and WP:PORN Legacypac (talk) 04:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am new here so I can't say anything more about WP:ACTOR and WP:PORN but she is not an actress or pornstar wholly. She is just claimed by medias and news portal as well as by herself. You can try searching about her in search engines.--KW Star 07:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - @Legacypac: The subject has worked in multiple movies like Chhesko and Jism. Sources 1, 2 and 3. However the article needs rewriting. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No need to rewrite the article. If you know anything more about her you can simply add there. Thanks.--KW Star 01:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Improperly closed by page creator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 13:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft as nominator - I'm going to suggest move this to Draft:Archana Paneru as I'm now somewhat convinced the subject may be notable and this page can be fixed. Perhaps the creator can add high quality sources not in English that will help. I'll watch and maybe clean up the page until it's ready to put back in main or turns out to be hopeless. Legacypac (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac What you are talking about? There is no reason to move the page. You if get any sources or contents then you can simply add it on the current page.--KW Star 02:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm throwing you a chance to improve the page. Otherwise it could get deleted. Legacypac (talk) 02:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The page has notibility so it must be keep at any cost.-KW Star 05:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft Agreed with nominator. She is an actoress now and saying erotic model as the main lead is absurd. I stick to my previous nomination and believe the article needs reworking from scratch. Should be moved to draft till then Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It sounds like she doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. According to the subject's article, "Jism" wasn't finished and "Chhesko" was poorly received, but the criteria requires "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." It seems like most of the actual article content may come from unreliable sources connected with the subject. - GretLomborg (talk) 05:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GretLomborg's analysis. There's a lack of notability here, although I agree that the subject could theoretically be so. I'm not seeing an awful lot of support for the draftification option, and the article creator seems against it, so that sounds like a non-starter, albeit a good idea. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BigHaz How can you say that the given sources are not reliable ? Check This link..its posted by kantipur's official site(one of the best news channel of Nepal) that she claims to be the first pornstar of Nepal. And similarly you can see the official site of 'The himalayan times' where about her movie chesko is posted. Check it.—Big Hero 06:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the "first Nepali pornstar" claim - she makes it other places but there are other porn stars from nepal like Bindu Pariyar Legacypac (talk) 06:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition (and I'll be away for a week, so any pings etc won't reach me until I'm back), I'd add that that link appears from its format (not that I can read Nepali, but I can see bolded "questions" with their answers attached) to be an interview. People can largely say what they want in interviews, much as Legacypac has indicated. Further, GretLomborg's comment was that multiple notable film roles would be required, rather than simply a critique of the reliability of the provided sources. The first half of that comment still stands, regardless of the reliability of the sources. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I google translated the page. Wow, Nepali to English is poor translation! It's indeed mostly an interview with extensive quotes in the first section that is not Q&A format. Best I can make out, at the time of the interview she is 17 and says she dreams of being a pornstar. So far she'd only posted some racy photos to facebook. The first part discusses that for Nepali society and law this idea is strange. She also lives in India, but comes from Nepal. A 17 year old's dreams do not make her notable under WP:PORN Legacypac (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.