Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariella Ferrera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 21:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Ariella Ferrera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no awards, no unique contributions, no coverage in mainstream media. Lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Mduvekot (talk) 01:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added more info and partial awards on the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poofbreeder (talkcontribs) 10:23, 15 August 2017 UTC (UTC)
AVN is not a RS and this still fails everything. Spartaz Humbug! 18:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The AVN citations are reprinted press releases, failing the intellectually independent test for reliable sources. Quantity of content does not establish notability, especially when that content is not based on independent secondary sources. Notability is judged on the availability of non-trivial independent reliable published sources or reliably sourced evidence of special achievement in porn. Neither are in evidence here. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -The official AVN links seem to show 404 error which means it may not be possible to cite the claimed info as per WP:PORNBIO. Also the spanish version of this article has survived for more than 30 months. Given the amount of contribution made by the performer to the adult industry, who unfortunately hasn't been mentioned much in media, I would like to give this article a chance to grow as the performer is still in business. -Casktopicsay 19:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Other language Wikipedia editions have their own notability guidelines. The es.Wikipedia article cites IMDb as its reference, clearly not acceptable here. As for AVN, all links are either working or are successfully waybacked. Two are republished press releases. The award nomination citations are trivial coverage confirming that the actress was nominated for awards. Nominations don't count towards PORNBIO notability. Finally, contributions to porn need reliable sources to verify them. They do not seem to be available. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate]]. [[Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
  NODES
admin 1
Note 5
Project 2
Verify 1