Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Leeds Carson
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2023 August 14. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ben Leeds Carson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Highly promotional. Does not meet: WP:COMPOSER or WP:MUSICBIO. Suspect to COI editing. Resume style article with primary sourced content. Maineartists (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the one LA Times article discusses this person, rest are in non-RS. Otherwise, all I find are USC news articles, which are primary sources. Oaktree b (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music Maineartists. (talk) 02:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, this promotional mess is sourced almost entirely to student newspapers and other unreliable sources. Even the LA Times article mentioned above does not contribute to notability, as its coverage of Carson amounts to a mere paragraph. Clear WP:GNG failure. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- In fact the LA Times coverage of Carson amounts to a mere sentence. The other half of the two-sentence paragraph is about a different musical piece by someone else. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.