Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BradTheLadLong (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per WP:G4 -- sufficiently similar recreation by SPA that fails to address previous concerns of N, RS and PROMO. Page salted. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BradTheLadLong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was deleted on July 4 for a lack of notability. The new edition's content is slightly different, but all the problems remain. It's promotional, largely not based on reliable sources, and does not show that BradTheLadLong meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. Huon (talk) 01:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable content.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G4 speedy applied, salting highly suggested Would have loved to know it sooner, but thus that's how it is. Anyways, outside of the new 'I'm going to waste the police's time on reporting bad comments about me waaaaah' nonsense (and deleted false information about them being cast in the upcoming American Celebrity Big Brother), absolutely zero improvement from the deleted version; vast majority of article sourced to Twitter and 'it exists' news articles. I'm watchlisting this now. Nate • (chatter) 13:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.