Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNN bias against Israel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CNN bias against Israel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article name begs the question; content is merely a list of one-sided accusations rather than a neutral, even-handed accounting of criticism of CNN's coverage of Israeli-Palestinian affairs. Even if we were to have an article about the topic, it would need to cover both sides of the equation, not just one. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 01:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Israel and its supporters believe <insert name of major American or European media outlet> is biased against Israel. Palestinians and their supporters believe <major American or European media outlet> bends over backwards to present the best possible case for Israel. Proceed to next major American or European media outlet. The article in question violates NPOV with almost every sentence, starting with its title, which pre-supposes the existence of such bias. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As others have noted, the page name itself is POV. It is biased and reads like an attack page. Meatsgains (talk) 02:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even if CNN is biased against Israel it isn't a notable enough bias for inclusion. MLA (talk) 04:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this is kept (which looks unlikely) it should be renamed to something like CNN coverage of Israel. KaisaL (talk) 23:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The uncited mention of a petition with 100 signatures is WP:OR. The article is WP:SYNTH. Unscintillating (talk) 03:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Really? Bias against a nation? Why is this not a CSD article? TomStar81 (Talk) 03:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as a blatant POVfork. We already have CNN controversies. GAB^gab 02:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - textbook WP:POVFORK — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.