Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambodian Cultural Village

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. So Why 20:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodian Cultural Village

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. no real third party coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It didn't take me long to find this source which claims that it was the center of an interntional conroversy that even involved the UN(!). Definitely seems to be a notable tourist attraction. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Andrew Lenahan above. I have added this reference. Also I believe that WP:BEFORE has not been followed fully. I suggest the nominator reads this before nominating further articles. In particular, adding a {{refimprove}} and/or {{notability}} template would have been appropriate before AfD in this case. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

keep on the basis of 1 source? suggest that Jpbowen reads WP:N, WP:ORG and WP:SIGCOV. I've previously applied the notability tag to about 100 articles...guess what in only 1 case someone bothered to improve the article. LibStar (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of sources to be found (e.g., see book references under Google books). I have added some more information and references. It is always a good idea to check for existing references and if they are there to either add them (preferably!) or if you don't have time, to add a {{refimprove}} template, as suggested above for this case. I hope this helps for the future. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:41, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep: Satisfied that sources exist for this topic. hope someone can expand it. would not rule out a merge to an article about Cambodian culture or Cambodian cities. Arskwad (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

what are these sources? only 1 exists so far. LibStar (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: See the {{Find sources}} Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL template above. There are many sources. I have added some. Do add some more. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.