Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Samples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Candy Samples

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced blp that appears to fail pornbio and gng Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reliable sources have ~~nothing~~ very little to say about this "legendary" porn "phenom." Porn trade press consists of the usual press releases and trivial mentions. She won a very obscure award at a fan festival, nowhere near satisfying WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

amended comment. A deeper search for reliable sources yielded trivial mentions, and a pointer to an interview in Adult Video News but nothing substantial. • Gene93k (talk) 04:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally fails both the general notability guidelines and the pronographic performer specific guidelines. No show of notability at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.