Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canvass for a Cause
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Canvass for a Cause (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:ORG. The author of the only secondary source may be affiliated with the organization: [1]. Regardless, the source reads like a press release and is hosted by GLTNewsNow.com, "a daily news-blogging site". I don't see any additional secondary coverage at all: [2]. — Rankiri (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources. The GLTNN articles read like rehashed press releases. And there is no coverage aside from the two article from GLTNN. All of the other references in the article are referenced to their own site or facebook. - Whpq (talk) 01:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. This one-year-old organization does not seem to have garnered any news coverage at all. The links are mostly to its own website and to facebook. That's what turns up on a Google search too - along with help-wanted ads. Maybe the organization will become more notable in the future, but it's not there now. --MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - xyxyboy, the lone defender of the page, is in fact its executive director. The article in the GLT is a reprint of a press release, and it is full of factual inaccuracies. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.133.195 (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.